protecting him? no way more like i could hate to see him win, that's why i wont vote for him in case he is a lyncher and i wont vote for rags in case he is a lyncher, but if there is a vigilante or JOAT out there, be my guest and NK the yellow rabbit if it strikes your fancy, because with him the ...
* Slips a "Vote Me" label onto Ragian's back, and updates their own table of contents to include the word "Poison" in the fine print * Now that you're here you may as well do what the labels say, who knows, maybe you'll stumble upon a refreshing tea-party if you do. Tempting, very tempting, i ...
:shock: this alice in wonderland moment is making me crave some tea, when did i ever decided to follow the yellow rabbit? anyway i am almost convinced that he is a jester and i don't want to hand him the win, he already won in my previous game, it's someone else turn now, but i do agree that most of ...
woah things got serious pretty fast here, i thought we were still in the joke phase but if we are serious here i agree with skoff that pika's coming across as a jester right now, and i don't feel like handing him an easy victory
Rags, wasn't full disclosure so much productive than sulking pointing at puppy? your blocking ability makes sense given your behaviour in rapport to MM, now as someone mentioned, scum could have a roleblocker too, but since seems you are an experienced scum player i doubt you could have been so ...
Ragian you are at lynch minus 1, and puppy is not, so i'ts obvious why you have more reasons for full disclosure than him, as of now you have lead us to believe that you are a jailer and your N1 target was MM, if you are as protown as you are claiming to be there should be no problems with giving us ...
@Pika, would you care to elaborate? To elaborate twirling of the mustache? You are asking him to stroke his beard too? http://www.gadgetshowprizes.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dick-dastardly..png Look there's Skoffie on the left!
OMG i used to love those cartoons, what are they called on ...
And no, I don't believe flavour claiming will help. Then the game would be over by now. I'm not sure how you think that the things you underlined from my quotes are contradictory. First, I say I have no problem claiming flavour( because it won't help catch ...
okay, since life has kindly cutted me some slack lately i went back and i browsed through puppies posts and they are few and mostly fluff, i think that's why he made less of an impression than the other ppl in my likely scum list, i wont clutter the thread posting again what zabeast neatly organized ...
I believe the scumminess is strong in MP, so I'll go back to him Unvote Vote MudPuppy . Note that I'll switch back to whoever of the three has the most votes if a deadline draws near , but I'd rather lynch MP (2nd place is probably close to a tie between mitch and BJ) nicely put zabeast, i will ...
Skoffin has replaced Bernie Sanders. Related trivia note: Bernie got banned because of boobs.
Boobs make the world go round :lol:
Also unvote Flores since her sweet words have robbed me of my blood lust. :) Also, he FOS on Skoff before Skoff even joined shows that Flores is very strong in ...
About inactivity and real life, i do agree that could be beyond silly to lie about it for gain an edge game wise, so i am counting on everyone to be truthful about their IRL issues, and if you are not, shame on you, tsk tsk
Your name. Flores. Not your wordings. Sorry, poorly phrased. ah yeah ...
vote Flores because her name is a work of a famous rogue
EBWOP aaw, missed you, you big literary ball of fluff heh, but as temping as an OMGUS is, ill go ahead and Vote madmitch because well, we do know that he's mad, and FOS Skoff because i can see the splatter from here even thought she's on ...
oh and BuJ please build your case on puppy, it is not very townie of you to vote someone without giving your reasons at the same time, plus why are you defending mitch so much? what makes you so certain of his innocence that you could be so bold in your attempt to steer the attention away from him ...
I was referring to this post, not the post in which you voted. Pika explained himself adequately after your vote on him but you still tried to make a case.
But I apologize for my messy train of thought that has now confused everyone in the process including myself. I'd policy lynch myself after ...
@Flores, are you saying that you voted for Pika before BuJ laid out his bait? Or am I not understanding you correctly? yep, and i proved it, i know you guys do not like LAL as a policy, and i can respect that, but it has always served me well, it did with dakky, and it might do the trick once ...
I went back and re reading my own posts on pika i noticed that i might be a little paranoid and the more stubborn i get the thinner my logic wears, so for the moment i'll Unvote Pika not because i am convinced of his innocence, but because i find myself unable to build a solid case against his ...