The game is way too old to still be listed in my games, but I still have the emails I sent them and the replies.

Quoting jimari13@xxxxx:

> Callsign: Jimari
> Profile: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=27049
> Email Address: jimari13xxxxxx
> Comment:
> Game #126022 ...

[quote="tahitiwahini
I'm interested in the glitch you experienced. Can you point me to the game please?[/quote]

Sure but it was around december I think, I will look for it now.

They own this site, they can do what ever they want. This could also include changing / modifying their rules.

What I find funny is when I first started playing here I lost a game (30 points) because of a glitch that was not awarding be any bonus armies for at least 7 rounds. They would not delete ...

You fortify at the end of your turn this is what I was talking about

How about adding a "No fortification" to the current options of "chained", "Adjacent" and "unlimited".? This way if this option is chosen during the game setup no players will be able to fortify any where. The games will be more challenging and require more skill to play.

I was assuming that everyone was honest when I made this sugestion. Ok I see the idea neads some work... oh well back to the drawing board.

How about extra points for games that go over a set amount of rounds. say 30. Most games that have a high amount of rounds require some skill to stay in.
To prevent intentionaly racking up the rounds the points could be just 1 for every 10 rounds.

This is too simple, the best player is the one with the best DICE.

wicked wrote:everyone needs a hobby I guess.

I was thinking this, also if they are enjoying themselves good for them.

No post for me.