Advancing

In for Norway please

in please

When one starts a game, the creator is given many options ... conditions for the game he or she wishes to start.

For example, a game can be:

- automatic or manual
- sequential or freestyle
- spoils can be escalating, flat, nuclear, or nonexistent
- reinforcements can be chained, adjacent, or ...

No, they are not ... a truce or lack thereof isn't a condition of the game. The point is to win within the parameters and conditions set for the given match. If one is fog, then let it be foggy. Respect that. But that doesn't mean one doesn't employ diplomacy or alliance to dominate the game. I ...

Wallyz32, it should be obvious to you that the point is to win the game, with the conditions of the game. If one of them is fog, the point is to win the game and adhere to that condition (same applies to spoils, excessive amounts of troops, and diplomacy between players who can see each other ...

I'll give it a shot--in please

I am not sure of the programmability of this option, but how about allowing for the "tie" button to appear only in cases of 50 or more consecutive rounds with no one taking additional territories?

And as a side note, the idea of one "team" joining games and the other players not knowing that they ...

Luck and win here as well (game 9046816).

I've always played escalating...oh, and if freemium can join, I'm in please

in please Great Lakes

I'm in, I'll give it a shot, as long as I don't have to be premium...

3 AND 6 to make 18

Arms Race for SirSebstar?

Assuming at least 25 rounds? I think we started with 2500 people? with single elimination, eliminating half the field each round we would have:

RD players
1 2500
2 1250
3 625
4 313
5 157
6 79
7 39
8 19
9 9
10 4
11 2
12 1

So the 11th round would be the finals. With the current format, if there are ...

A good start, but at this rate, there's going to be, like 100 rounds, so there might maybe be time to catch up

Anyone know if there's a clue to NightStrike's bounty game?

This may sound kind of silly, but do the bounty games count towards the "unique opponent" rule? I already won one bounty, but lets say I join another bounty game against someone else and lose. If I make it to the next round, am I now unable to join another bounty game against that same person unless ...

I'm guessing 43 (1943 was my mother-in-law's birth year and all my other numbers were picked lol)

Is there any awards for quickest finish? I won a game on the 7th turn/round. Game:8655265


That's quick, but I won 2 games in round 5, lost one in round 6 (means someone else won) and beat HA for bounty in round 7. Lets see if anyone can do it by turn 4

*EDIT

Hmmmm--I'm not going to go ...

In other words, the contest is good as it stands

yes, which means that whoever guesses first always has a better chance to get it first. So by waiting a day or two, you may have fewer numbers from which to choose, but you also run the risk of a zero percent chance because the number was already chosen. Which means the contest should remain as is ...

What? You should always be guessing from the remaining numbers. Only 1 person can win.
Do you not get it? I think you are very confused cause your post makes no sense whatsoever. When did I say that more than one person should/can win?

Let me break down for you:

The point I am trying to make is ...

42 and 275

Yeah, I tried that too. But only 1 time (got the one in there just in case lol)