I was killing some time looking over my old posts after being largely inactive on CC for a long time. I see this thread has picked up some steam. That's great.

@nryan115: I believe i was the one who started the thread that merged with this one, after which point I endorsed your points completely ...

This has been already been brought up countless times before..... It's not going to happen.

I find that an interesting statement. If it has been brought up so very many times... why isn't it going to happen? That seems counter intuitive. Usually, the more a request is brought up the more likely ...

The BOB script, which I have used for a long time now, is a poor replacement for true replay support. In my opinion, the goals of this project should be:

1) Allow a player to see the board at the start of any past turn (not just between rounds) with whatever board visibility the player had at that ...

Has there been any progress on this effort?

PLAYER57832 wrote:I am not sure this will help much of anything. I believe Lack, etc knows which suggestions they want to implement.

Somebody please tell me this isn't the attitude held by CC. Very few companies do well doing whatever they want rather than what their customers want.

If some kind of "make the dice more fair" algorithm were added to reduce good/bad streaks, can you imagine how loud the complaints will be when people feel screwed by bad dice? Because now there will be an actual human-created algorithm to blame!

Leave the random dice alone, that's my vote.

I think this feature would be cool, too. But I'm not really posting about that. I have observed that in this suggestions forum it is all too common for the people who seem to be speaking for CC to belittle the suggestion. I recognize that these people are probably volunteers (at least that's my ...

Great! Then no architecture changes are needed and it really is just a matter of changing a number somewhere. I vote for at least 24 hours, if not more.

This is a great idea. And if you leverage Google Moderator (http://www.google.com/moderator/) I think you can get something working fairly quickly and easily. Moderator is designed to do exactly what you're looking for, and it's free.

The only drawback is that you would not have control over who ...

I think that would be a great idea, myself. It would also level the playing field between people who check on games often and those who check only on their turn.

Metsfanmax wrote:A similar topic was actually brought up before: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 1&t=141496

Thanks Metsfanmax! That thread does discuss this same issue. I added a post there.

I wish I had known about this thread when it was active. Of course, I almost never interact on the forums, so that's no surprise. I am a premium member, though, and I do like the games. Earlier today I posted a suggestion for a much longer timeout because I was also annoyed by having to login so ...

Concise description:

Extend login timeout to 24 hours or more

Specifics/Details:

The current login timeout is somewhere around half an hour, maybe an hour. This isn't much longer than what is standard on bank sites! For game sites, something like 24 hours seems more appropriate. There's ...

I'll play if you still need people

I'll try it. Thanks.

Concise description:

Request for non-colored spoils to remove some randomness

Specifics:

I would like to suggest another type of spoils. Similar to flat-rate, but without colors. As soon as you have 3 spoils, you have a set. The value could be 7 or 8 or so. There will always be ...