While statistics speak for themselves, there is no accounting for bad luck; however improbable. The fewer troops involved in the battle, the more likely you are to have streaks of incredible good or bad luck. Because of the luck factor, I don't make a kill sweep unless I know I can finish it ...
Definite bigotry, checking on the multi charge. Will wait for that before going through with the bigotry. I read it twice and I do not see bigotry. Maybe someone could tell me where and what the bigotry is.
I'm having difficulty finding any of it that I WOULDN'T consider bigotry.
bostncurt31 from 10992075 says I need to look up the term "suiciding" because I use it incorrectly. I thought it was a fairly straightforward term, but finding an official definition is more difficult than I thought, so maybe I do need an explanation. I concluded that Suicide seems to be ...
There is one example I recall reading in an article of a game on the classic map. Midway through the game, the player holding Australia deadbeated out of the game, turning all his troops, including the 20+ stack defending Australia into neutrals. However, later in the game, one player who had not ...
I won a game rcently on world 2.1. It was a hard won victory on flat rate, unlimited reenforcements, and no fog. I was behind a more powerful player who took CA and SA while I took Canada and persuaded him to allow me to take the USA after making a truce with him. This was a tricky position as it ...
Yeah, I remember the first time I posted in the strategy forum as a recruit. I gave my opinion on how to play the classic RISK map or something, and someone said "Speaking of multis...." and another "I was thinking the same thing." so players do tend to assume the worst it you seem to know what you ...
It's dirty strategy from my point . I defenetly foed you if you did that to me, and mayby had started a kamikaze attack against you(depending on my mood)
I quess evereryone playes as fair as they are in everyday life
So, as a preliminary conclusion, how will you act in the future in the same ...
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=139928 ... It seems Pony has busted herself. Turns out she had multiple accounts, and turned herself in because she said she was tired of players getting away with what she perceived as cheating.
LOL! I laughed my ass off! It does sound pretty funny the way Pony explains it. It doesn't even matter to her that I was the one to eliminate Gray, I was obviously in Secret Diplomacy with him, HAHA! Hey, if any of you guys want to engage in secret diplomacy, you can send an email to ...
_Spike, not to hate on the whole agreeing with me thing, but how are you so knowledgeable? You seem to know a lot about the inner details of the site even though you've only been part of the site for a month, and havn't played any games or made any posts apart from this one so far. Quite odd I think ...
I wouldn't go so far as to say secret diplomacy, but perhaps an unsaid understanding. Maybe Red was trying to keep a low profile, hoping to leap back into the game later since this was escalating, and Green putup with his existence, knowing he could destroy Red if he wanted to, and looked at him as ...
I figured this was comming, as two people have already foed me for supposed Secret Diplomacy, so I suppose I shall make my case. This game is on the World 2.1 map. Innitially, gray (thefive) and i did fight a bitter war for Asia, where he came out on top. My attempt to take a bonus in Africa was ...
I have another one for you. Game [game]8368941[/game]; PonyGal accuses me of taking advantage of FOW to have a Secret Diplomatic Alliance with Gray. Let the new topic begin...