Accused:

Seinfeld1
vidaro



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

16063126


Comments:

I'm not certain on this but could use some help verifying. The two are both from the same location, both accounts opened with 48 hours of each other ...

Accused:

KAHO00
gary80641


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):

7975509


Comments:

Something really suspicious about these two. gary refuses to attack kahoo even when bonuses are left wide open for attack, and the two work together to eliminate everyone else ...

From my limited knowledge (very, very rusty), he's saying:

line1: He's asking for advice
line2: He asks to "pass me your troops that you do not need"
line3: "P3 if you want"
line4: "I'll take T3 after"
line5: "In fact, take T3 because they will mass troops above it and" something something

Meh ...

Bones2484 wrote:Also, you have no clue why Owen is doing this. It's not a statement on Jesus, so get off your high horse and stop judging people like your God supposedly teaches.

Yeah, we religious freaks are incapable of saying anything "tongue in cheek", I guess.

Yeah, doubtful anything will be done about this, though you raise a good point about images such as the degrading of the Twin Towers and anything involving Hitler. I'd also bet you if Muhammed's picture appeared somewhere, it'd be deemed "offensive" and have to be removed. But that's life, not just ...

Like I said, I'm not defending his actions--he made a poor choice in how he responded.

But if ronc would like to avoid similar situations in the future, he could probably treat his teammates with a little more respect--especially the low ranked ones.

This isn't a defense of citizen's actions, but...

Reading through the chat, ronc8649 doesn't exactly come across as the ideal teammate. That's a lot of verbal aggression against a guy just because he didn't "follow orders". While I wouldn't have gone as far as breaking the rules, I'd have ...

Every game I lose is full of multis in secret alliances who use aimbots.

You bring up some good points, Semp, and yeah, I can see where it would be hard not to imagine secrets between friends/relatives. I'm not sure what the solution here is, just seeing what others think of the situation.

Just ...

Yeah, that's what I'm doing. It just bugs me. And because the admins have been telling us to not play public games, I know that's going to come back to bite us next time we're accused, which should be... oooh... a day or two from now?

Yeah eddie, I've played MANY games like that. The problem is that now the "whiners" are starting to take the accusations to the next level and post "Secret Alliance" accusations in record numbers.

Here's my issue: Why pay for a game you can only partially play? If I had bought Battlefield 2 to ...

Question for the brotherhood:

What's the point of the friends list? I've seen on MANY occasions the following scenario: two friends join a public game, let on through game chat that they know each other, and as soon as one of the other players starts losing, he turns the two friends in as a ...

I really don't care what happens at this point, man. I'm just going to let the admins do what they want and hopefully they see this thread for what it is. A waste of all our time.

One way or another, I'm probably done.

Well, I guess that's what I have a problem with--that we have a "history" when nothing is going on. But whatever. Do what you gotta do, I guess.

I'm pretty disenchanted with things right now, so I may be done for good anyway, which is sad because I really enjoy this site.

Like I said, "my opinion". I'm not proposing we punish misher (although the foe's list thing is a done deal). There shouldn't be punishment for the number of accusations if they are legitimate accusations. However, one could make accusations a part of their regular strategy. For example...

In this ...

In my opinion, there ought to be negative consequences for making an accusation that is cleared, or for making a certain number of accusations in a certain amount of time, as I see this isn't misher's first and probably isn't his last. That way certain players wouldn't make an accusation per game ...

Yeah, I know. That was just the one that my accuser brought up =)

(I'd also be willing to send screenshots of my PM history or allow admins to access my account to prove that no PM strategizing is taking place.)

I wondered the same thing. I've noticed that they typically come from higher ranked players who don't want to lose to lower ranked players.

As previously noted, Lumpy and I are related and have taken the advice of the admins not to start any further public games together, despite evidence that we ...

We're all related--Lumpy and I are brothers, the others are cousins. We got into Conquer Club at a family reunion and have been playing ever since. As for secret alliances, no. We almost always play in games against each other (or on each other's teams occasionally) but take a look at our game ...

I'd be curious to know how many "possible cheaters" are spotted in Fog of War games. First few times I thought something was off, it turned out to be my more experienced opponent holding a bonus territory I didn't know about and couldn't see due to FOW.

And what defines odd play?