Bastard, I don't know what you want us to say. If you've made your decision not to continue mapmaking, then I guess that's it, no use continuing this debate. If you want someone to convince you otherwise... well, pretty much everything that can be said has already been said.

about what you ...

I did, and after doing a search in the threads, i found exactly three posts in Spanish Armada...nowhere else. I'd hardly call that hard core posting in my threads, would you?

yes, just three posts. but after my post you added ships, battle sites to the map, so I hope these my only three post ...

A bummer. You had a lot of really great idea's, it's a shame that none of them ever came into completion

Baltic Crusade is in Final foundry...
I am sorry you feel like this theBastard.

yes I feel it so. but it is not only my feeling - it is fact, a very little interest in my maps...

I for ...

Update! Update! Update!

thanks Nola for interest and support. but there will be no more updates.

this is my end in this page. I mean not only in drawing maps, but I will not be active here more.
I came back after my thumb injury. I think that this map is interesting (as gameplay, also WWII theme ...

natty_dread wrote:On the small map, the grey area surrounding Riga seems to be missing it's border, which is there on the large.

it looks as border on small map has another shape as on big one...

nobodies, what about to write to legend?:
2 Papal Legatus + 1 with Riga city

good progres.

why Williams has another colour as others British front line?
you could change 150 yard line in Dingane, Kwanele, Thabo to copy dry rivers bed.
is needed those light brown line under trees?

Dukasaur wrote:I've been in Canada most of my life but I was born in Praha...

so we can speak CzechoSlovak... Praha is beautiful city, did you visit it after arrival?

Dukasaur wrote:Yes, the new railroads and arrows are much better!

thanks. glad you like it.

vote for second one.

great nobodies. thanks

natty what about something like this? and in small map delete all small names, stars and so on and only write here bonuses and names as you had in previous versions...
[bigimg]http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2993/yugo2n.png[/bigimg]

Yes to the city symbol.
As for altering the bonus for the Baltics, I don't want it to become a huge staging place for an attack on Poland and Ukraine. It wasn't like that in the war, and that's what I'm sticking to.

Thanks for the feedback!

I understand your Baltics idea

agree with gimil ...

Kabanellas wrote:But you're probably right. Maybe I should change the legend from 'Diocesis Capitals' to 'Vicarious Seats'

you have explainted in the low left legend that diocesis capitals attack vicarious seats. and I think it would be fine if you write "vicarious seats" to west and also east side.

if I good read the map, the diocese capital assaults vicarius in legend in the upper right corner. if yes you should delete "diocesis capitals" and write here "vicarius".

wrt. eblem: I'm a big believer in simplicity on maps. I don't believe in cluttering the map full of every damn thing you can think of that you can possibly associate with the subject of the map, which seems to be popular these days... The flag works, because it's part of the title. Adding another ...

natty_dread wrote:I don't see the SFRY emblem fitting the colour scheme of the map.

and how the flag fitting with colour scheme then? the emblem has the same colours as flag...

maybe use only Yugoslavian emblem only to the left low corner?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_ ... Yugoslavia

sorry me, but the flag where you have it now looks bad. there is enough title of the map.
try add flag under small legend anyway. or forgot it, I think.

looking good.

maybe Baltics could be +2.
maybe you would add "city symbol" to the legend where you speak about Cities.

I'm not sure what you're getting at with that...

just quick idea and draft. it looks awful...

---ANYWAY, feast your eyes on this---


looking better. maybe try something like this, but with your background paper - I like its colour, so if you can lift up upper right corner...
http&#58 ...

both looks fine. I like glow more. but do not know why

only legend is out of...

what about something like this?
[bigimg]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/5251/yugo15a.png[/bigimg]

maybe to the legend about bonuses - in the right low corner - would be written:
+1 w. Visby connected to Danzig, Konigsberg or Reval by ship.
and delete "to any Hanseatic town".

ender, please can you edit XML? you have codded trade route Visby-Visby ship-Dago-Osel-Riga. but this is not valid. only connections by ships are valid. sorry, just now I saw this...

but this helps, I see how are connection confusing.

nobodies, do you think there must be edited text about this ...

now when we know what bonus is what it is clear

then Victor has point here - the large iButhos will give big (also quick) bonus.

koontz1973, it is still not clear. you mixed/changed warriors with territories.
also legend says - warriors within rivers are not part of any iButho. you mean warriors in river or also in dry river bed?

natty_dread wrote: I think you're just being stubborn about this

as you are about not change bridges
it is just my opinion. but I am ok with your decision.