Although there might be a few things we would have liked to tweak in an ideal world, it seems to be functioning well.
I would be very happy to see it quenched as is!

Thanks much!

Interested. Would have to see what's involved.

Thanks bud...

Updated tournament links and winner, it appears we should have jonofperu joining josko into the Hall of Fame, he is 2 games away from being undefeated in his Midkemdil tournament, I hope I didn't jinx you bud...good luck for those last rolls!!!

Mission accomplished.
Lucky dog ...

Well I don't know if this is it, but I turned on my VPN and set it to USA and Conquer Club started loading fast...
If it sticks I guess I have a solution.
Does that make sense though?
Fast speed tests from my location here in Peru and some websites load fast, but CC, a Moodle server and some other ...

My son decided he wanted to run a tournament on my map so we built it in Minecraft for a graphic.
I'll help him run it. He needs people to join.

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=234168

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50287736597_b21cc0fd4a ...

In please!

The issue is, I'm testing my speed and getting over 200 Mbps. But some sites like CC have this lag issue at particular times in spite of what appears to be a fast connection.
My internet isn't slow, just CC (and a Moodle site I use). Other things, no problem.
But if you guys never have this issue ...

Here's another:
Queued at 2.4 min
Started at 2.4 min
Resource Scheduling DURATION
Queueing 3.88 ms
Connection Start DURATION
Stalled 4.05 ms
Proxy negotiation 0.37 ms
DNS Lookup 49 μs
Initial connection 2.87 s
SSL 2.87 s
Request/Response DURATION
Request sent 0.16 ms
Waiting (TTFB) 5.61 s
Content ...

Showing all kinds of lag in the network tab.
How should I copy the info or how should I share it here?
For example, the last action I took:
Queued at 34.61 s
Started at 34.61 s
Resource Scheduling DURATION
Queueing 2.16 ms
Connection Start DURATION
Stalled 5.43 ms
Proxy negotiation 4.04 ms
DNS ...

I do see it caught one of the "timed out" errors. ("Communication with the server has timed out. Wait another 10 seconds?")
I get those a lot and then the "Communication aborted. Please click on [refresh map] link." one too.

I was posting because site seems to be really slow sometimes. Doesn't seem to be the issue people are reporting with games ending.
I have blazing fast internet now (a speed test is giving me over 200MB), but there are times CC becomes slow as molasses. Here's the console info as requested:

CC,3 ms ...

I finally got a fiber optic internet connection a few weeks ago.
But for the last couple of days the CC server seems to be SLOW. Today I'm even getting operation timeout messages when taking turns.
I've got blazing fast 200MB internet and CC slows down.

I'm counting 7 wins for Team 6, 5 wins for Team 4 in the final with [game]20052392[/game] undecided. We were fortunate at the right times.

EDIT: and now that game is done. 7-6. Very close! Well played team 4!

In please. Thanks for the invite.

In please

By the way... is B the way it's playing now?

Wow, haven't been back to this page in a long time, though I've played the map occasionally. Message me if I need to respond to something please. Somebody asked me about the map and I'm just now seeing this. (Hopefully my settings will let me know when there are replies now.)

No way we would want ...

In please

In as a reserve. And I would welcome any feedback!

UPDATE: Well, that was annoying, but finally got all links to images updated on Flickr after Photobucket kicked the bucket.
Still waiting on XML updates...

Makes sense to me to exclude "No reinforcements" on a map with autodeploys like this one.

My fellow map-maker, Swife, has been taking some time off from CC and I left the coding up to him. So there are still a couple problems that need to be fixed before I feel we can really evaluate the play:
1. Starting positions
2. Summit decay

Other than that, I'm open to excluding nukes and ...

Thanks for all the feedback! It seems many complaints are related one way or another to the deploy scenario in 1v1. The original intention was that in games with 2-4 players (or 2 poly), deploy would follow this layout:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4535/38563470246_fe7731ab77_o&#46 ...

robellis00 wrote:is there a way to also prevent nuclear and zombie spoils on the home terits?

That would be an awesome option. I hate nukes generally, but they can be so unfair if you kill a starting spot like on this map.