in.

lol the minimum number of characters is 4 so i'm typing this sentence.

Private lessons from a former #1 player

is this in regards to cc or something else private?

nice hustle.

hmmmm, makes me wonder.

Haha.

Just to be clear, these are lessons to improve your Conquer Club game. Although if no one accepts, I might have to resort to giving out other types of ...

Private lessons from a former #1 player

is this in regards to cc or something else private?

nice hustle.

hmmmm, makes me wonder.

Haha.

Just to be clear, these are lessons to improve your Conquer Club game. Although if no one accepts, I might have to resort to giving out other types of ...

Although it probably won't matter in the end, playing with 3 decks changes the hand rankings slightly.

It is actually harder to get just a high card than it is to get one pair and therefore one pair should have a lower hand ranking than a high card: http://www.pagat.com/vying/pokerprob.html

Out of curiosity, who has taken you up on your previous offers?

They have asked for me not to reveal that information on the forums. PM me if you are interested in finding out about my previous clients.

As for my record in fog of war games, unfortunately I have a small sample size. However, of ...

It's that time again... unlimited private lessons from me, maniacmath17, a former #1 ranked player on this site. All you have to do is buy me a premium membership for the low cost of $25. I hate to be this cheap but forking over $200k for med school doesn't leave me with much extra cash at the ...

The game with the most strategy would be the one with the least luck involved. Sequential doesn't deal with factors such as what time others decide to take their turn, or who has the better internet connection.

Think about it. Why is chess the ultimate strategy game? No luck involved.

Any chance you could add an optional sound effect if the status of a game changes? Awesome add-on btw.

password? also if someone could set up some standard freestyle escalating games that would be awesome.

lackattack wrote:It's coming soon, Itrade. I know you've waiting patiently for a long time!

Any updates on this? I really hate making people wait on me, but certain situations in escalating games call for skipping a turn. It'd be nice to save everyone 24 hours.

How did he know who I was? I was idle for over a year before that post, lol.

Odds of 27v1 are low, but it doesn't mean it cannot happen on your 3rd try. It can happen, it does happen and it doesn't break the statistics at all.

Again, anything "can" happen but these outcomes aren't likely to occur with random dice given the relatively few number of games on this site ...

I know it was me and then comic back in the day. No one else reached the top until speed games were introduced. Then the likes of poo and scott made it.

I may be back at least for a little while, gotta do something over thanksgiving break, lol.

I'm not sure I understood your phrasing. Are you saying you don't think 27 v 1 is plausible or that it is?

And yes, anything is possible given enough rolls. My point is that we haven't had enough rolls on this site to justify some of the unlikely outcomes that we see.

It's kind of like the ...

what kind of math?

The only two minors offered were applied math and pure math, I went with pure. 3.94 GPA in those classes. I wouldn't make the thread if there wasn't something to it.

Statistically speaking, there's some stuff that happens on this site that just wouldn't occur with random ...

i'm in

What is the most troops you've had attack a country with 3 and lose? I just lost a 22 v 3 a few minutes ago. In case you were wondering, that's 99.99541% to win.

I also lost a 21 v 6 in the same game which is only a 99.8% favorite but combine the two and that should basically never happen in a ...

From 2006 myself and robinette secretly kept track of a lot of stats and shared information amongst one another, at times we would shared some with maniacmath, sully800 who was a math wizard and liked stats and graphs, then we shared some for info. with others who were early in super elite user ...

Guys it's over. KLOBBER lost the argument a while ago when he admitted that he believed the attacker has the advantage. This of course is true as we can calculate the probability of the different outcomes in a 3 v 2 situation which gives a slight edge to the attacker. The problem is that with the ...

Guys it's over. KLOBBER lost the argument a while ago when he admitted that he believed the attacker has the advantage. This of course is true as we can calculate the probability of the different outcomes in a 3 v 2 situation which gives a slight edge to the attacker. The problem is that with the ...

KLOBBER, you still haven't answered my question by the way. How do you know which advantage is greater. 3 attacker dice, or 2 defender dice with ties going to defender? I would determine this through programs that calculate dice odds which of course you said are not applicable to this site. Direct ...

...there are no odds, and no random dice, therefore you have a 100% chance of winning every roll - regardless of attack or defense....

That's not what I said. It's your opinion, not mine, and your attempt at putting words in my mouth has failed.

Then what is your reasoning KLOBBER? Without ...

Haha, oddly enough my first post is on the same subject.

"I'm gonna be gone on vacation for a couple days, and currently I hold a continent.

Assumimg that I no longer hold the continent after missing 2 rounds, do I get my 3 reinforcements multiplied by 3 and get the continent bonus for the rounds ...

I've been asking for clarification as to how exactly the streakyness was tested and have yet to get an answer .

Not true, you just ignored it. IIRC most of it is posted in the dice complaints thread in the suggs & buggs forum (I linked to it earlier) and the rest can be found in other old dice ...

I've been asking for clarification as to how exactly the streakyness was tested and have yet to get an answer. Like I said, work through the calculations that me and other players have done in this thread, and see where we may have gone wrong. The fact still remains that losing 30 v 1 given the ...