way too much to read here.... but just to clarify: my problem with players such as naruto, is that he creates games where you can only join by password. he selects his victims. he won't allow any good player to join his games because he could fae defeat. That is not what you expect from a conqueror ...

iAmCaffeine wrote:have u been playing team games with cheffed?

I have not played with cheffed yet.

Whats written demonstrates the points, but I suppose I still disagree with the conclusion.

Lets see if I can manage a small length response. (came back to edit this - I failed gonna rant for another long post. if you like reading... well you are welcome. If you don't whatever the thing is tldr? I ...

I think Don, MC and Random all share my opinion partially. I'm nitpicking a quote not because I disagree or agree with everything else, just because I dont think I should respond to the other parts. So excuse my little post

I think its entirely possible you have a player who can win multiplayer ...

CC is a game of multiple styles. Saying that skill at the style you like should determind the conqueror sounds stupid.

For me ideally the conqueror should be the one who perform best in all styles that require skill.

Styles that require skill can be defined as those where a skillful player can in ...

@Random

I didn't read the entire posts but if I understand correctly you are saying multiplayer games does not require skill? Or that winning multiplayer games requires skills that shouldn't reflect the conqueror?

You need to clearly write your conclusion and then write arguments about it.

I ...

Yeh, simple time restriction then.

Things would have to be hashed out. But anything is doable. Probably need someone who can actually make it happen be involved.

leave Eurasia mini outta this!

Il be honest with you. Eurasia mini is a very small map and arguably not much skill BUT.

In the 4 games that I played on it, the way the neutrals dropped and split the board... you could totally strategize and I was surprised how much fun it was. Im not about to go ...

Also, while some may disagree, no standard multiplayer games. This doesn't reflect skill. So you can play 10 standard games against 12 different players? Lose 10 points in the games you lose, and win over 120 in the two you manage to win? so you go -80 lets say over course of 8 games. and +240 in ...

Your enormous post provokes a certain number of small whys, but I'll neglect them all in the favor of one biggest WHY:

Why should conqueror be chosen the way you suggest, instead of current, natural way?

That seems to be what the thread is about? Something unfair about current method of ...

What to write... you ll have to forgive me, my posts are never structured, just big rants.

Wasn't really a lot throughout the thread that seemed to be pushing anything substantive forward. Im not sure I have anything substantive to add, but the common problem of CC members complaining because ...

I find the antarctica ones more suspicious than the eurasia is all im saying.

Is antarctica hard for a new player to grasp? Did he do very well at it?

I never bothered to play it really. If it's just a stacking game those don't interest me for 1 round of attacking i dunno.

Doesn't sound ...

I was accused of being mult before. I rose quick.

My opinion is that this is not a mult. I've only played 3 games of eurasia 1 v 1 unlimited sunny flat rate against him. So its limited knowledge.

I won 2. Lost 1. I dont find it suspicious personally. The map is very easy to win with first turn ...

Ok so new fort method involving "passing" or "assigning" forts.

Exclusively team games really.

So let's say team game of red green blue yellow vs pink cyan orange grey.

Classic current version, each take their turn, attack, and fort.

Revised version: Each take their turn and attack, but have ...

Ok, I had a working idea for a map.. but I'm not a map maker anyways. But was thinking along this line.

If I hold territory A. this leads all players owning territories B to lose -5 troops per turn.

So territories can already have - negative deploys assigned to them by owning them.

Essentially ...

yeah no idea how to code. but the possibilities seem promising. so mentioned

Specifically thinking of this in like a trench game, large map. Mostly for creation of new maps.

Ok so you have a territory that you attack like a trebuchet in kc2, or any map with a killer neutral, or a territory where you can do lots of bombarding from. Or like airports in usa 2.1.

So its a ...

yeah, interested to know more of the fine print, but can say I'm willing to give it a shot.

universal pre turn reinforcement fort option

Haven't suggest anything in ages. Here's one to start me up again.

I imagine categorizing this in reinforcement tab, labelling it pre turn forts. But it could take shape a number of different ways.

Usually a fort is at the end of the turn, but it ...

Aye.

Same as you.

um k?

what is shielding here? fishy myself and josko are the accused. anyways.

There is nothing here. Just let the ruling happen.

Ok. Let's move this along. I'm so sick of this conversation.

I'm even sicker that in a case that deemed Top to be guilty they are trying to pull this out acting more innocent than what I imagine they are.

So let's move forward with this review.

I don't even need the original case against TOP to ...

I was wondering if other people have played this game.

It is a chess variant... I think you can play it online in a couple places? legendary games or Facebook. It is hard to find these days in rl I think, but I do have a copy.

Essentially the board and pieces are customizable. So you can have a 6 ...

? i like sharing... i don't need to hog the idea, i can let other people build the idea if they read and it sparks something

was your comment just rhetorical ? errrr