(To the OP) Hell no.

If I foe a player, it's usually for good reason, and if I join a game that they aren't in, I sure as hell do not want them joining after me. The foe list is there to protect member's rights to have fun. If you don't want to play with someone, you shouldn't have to ...

There may be a (separate) issue about the foeing system. However, you appear to be side-stepping the point that, whenever you foe someone, it's fully justified, but when someone foes you, it might not be. My point is that, however odd their reason, it's justified in their eyes. For whatever ...

Sorry, but this is a very one-sided view.
Try turning it round: you have foed someone because he was very rude to you, played badly, broke a truce, gave you a bad rating, whatever. You really don't want to play him ever again, and it's all perfectly justifiable in your eyes.
You then join a game ...

Do you understand why those games are going to start soon? Because someone started them from scratch a few days ago, and players joined at their own pace. Once those games fill, the game you started will become the most attractive option. If everyone followed the "only join a game with 1-2 spots ...

I will not join any game that anyone has foed me or I foed them. I haven't foed many but do not want to play in any game with them fullstop!!!

Cry some more?

Where is there a list to see who has foed you? I have been foed by countless people for WINNING games against them. People, on this site ...

[FOE JOINS A GAME BEFORE YOU - YOU CAN STILL JOIN GAME]

You should still be capable of joining a game that someone whom foed you joins

The moment someone else makes a game (say a friend) and a person whom foed you joins before you join - you are automatically disqualified from ever joining it ...

I'm in. Place me accordingly please.

Thanks

SO, you slate me in public; bash my playing style and foe communication to prevent any attempt of resolution amongst our differences like adults: talk it out.

Why not play a few games? I'd like the opportunity to see you rage quit, deadbeat and add more undesirable tags to my profile?

I believe ...

RE: afroaction ratings abuse
by afroaction on Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:07 am

citizencane86 wrote:
Accused:
afroaction
The accused are suspected of:
Other: (Ratings Abuse)
The accused did not like the fact that I joined 4 of his games in a row (casual). As a result, he foed me and gave me 0 ratings with ...

Accused:
afroaction
The accused are suspected of:
Other: (Ratings Abuse)
The accused did not like the fact that I joined 4 of his games in a row (casual). As a result, he foed me and gave me 0 ratings with the tags "cheap tactics".

This was a result of me winning 3/4, period. He complained in all ...