lagger-no-1 wrote:looking at the score board, I have noticed that in game 8 all players have been marked as 4 except Godd with a 1
This is because the game log has been deleted and I have no way to know the order of elimination. I am very sorry about this, I will try to check the games every other day as apposed to once a week. So the winner gets 1 point and the rest get 3.5<<<4 which rounded up to 4 on my spread sheet but is still reflected in the total score as 3.5 (3.5 is par for the first course) Again I am sorry but when you guys post the score on this thread it helps out tremendously!!!!!
Shouldnt all the rest have 4 points?? 2+3+4+5+6 are 20 that divided to 5 are 4? If you have the winner you should give all the rest 4.
3.5 is par exactly so that is what I gave them. Basically it is a neutral score it doesn't improve or hurt your par. I feel that this is the best solution and it should not affect who gets into the Majors later
I still believe in my suggestion. If you put the winner as 1 and give the rest 3,5 it will give a bit less total point than if you give away all the points as it will be with 1 eor winner and 4 to the rest. If you dont have the winner then 3,5 to all players.
lagger-no-1 wrote:looking at the score board, I have noticed that in game 8 all players have been marked as 4 except Godd with a 1
This is because the game log has been deleted and I have no way to know the order of elimination. I am very sorry about this, I will try to check the games every other day as apposed to once a week. So the winner gets 1 point and the rest get 3.5<<<4 which rounded up to 4 on my spread sheet but is still reflected in the total score as 3.5 (3.5 is par for the first course) Again I am sorry but when you guys post the score on this thread it helps out tremendously!!!!!
Shouldnt all the rest have 4 points?? 2+3+4+5+6 are 20 that divided to 5 are 4? If you have the winner you should give all the rest 4.
3.5 is par exactly so that is what I gave them. Basically it is a neutral score it doesn't improve or hurt your par. I feel that this is the best solution and it should not affect who gets into the Majors later
I still believe in my suggestion. If you put the winner as 1 and give the rest 3,5 it will give a bit less total point than if you give away all the points as it will be with 1 eor winner and 4 to the rest. If you dont have the winner then 3,5 to all players.
Lufsen is right ofcourse - The "losers" should get below par - not par. Moreover, Lufsen's calculation is accurate - the amount of points granted, should be the same in every game - thus 4 for the "losers".
As for the cards, I'm not sure I will continue for the next round, thus I'm not certain I should vote. But I think many wouldn't join (including me) if they knew there might be change in cards (hate the esc cards).
gp
High: 22(rank) @ 3186(score) --------------- Co-Winner (with Prini, thinktank): Triples Battle of the World
The points given will remain 3.5 and not 4
Lufsen75 calculation is correct but I am not going to put people over par because their game was archieved early
Highest point total 2774 and a rank of Colonel. OSA of You OSA Obsructing Your Sleep GOSTEELERS!!!
brandoncfi wrote:The points given will remain 3.5 and not 4 Lufsen75 calculation is correct but I am not going to put people over par because their game was archieved early
Give them Par for that hole then. If it is 4 as par give them 4, if 3 give 3.
I see you have been debating my question re-game 8. All very interesting but game 8 result is on page 17 albeit late, so could you ammend scores please
I have several midterms this week so keep the updates coming we should be nearly done with this course by the end of the week. I plan to do a major update as well as announce the new groups this weekend
Highest point total 2774 and a rank of Colonel. OSA of You OSA Obsructing Your Sleep GOSTEELERS!!!
but when you guys post the score on this thread it helps out tremendously!!!!!
