Middle America Map {Advanced Draft} ~ NEW UPDATE 2.3!!

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:11 pm

That be one tight map

Zackismet · Post by **Zackismet** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:26 pm

quiero este! Los colores son bellos y todo es muy bueno. No puedo esperar

eye84free · Post by **eye84free** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:23 am

i like the map...hope to play it soon....

cramill · Post by **cramill** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:20 pm

Zackismet wrote:quiero este! Los colores son bellos y todo es muy bueno. No puedo esperar

Translation for all you who don't speak spanish: I want [or like] this one! The colors are beautiful and everything is very good. I cant wait.

I like it too. It looks awesome.

ttocs · Post by **ttocs** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:09 am

cool map,
I can't wait to play it

tomatoman25 · Post by **tomatoman25** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:19 am

so what's left to be done on this one??

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:29 am

Andy quenching.. maybe I should fake quench it.. it worked with hong kong.

belgianwaffle31 · Post by **belgianwaffle31** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:37 pm

I absolutely love this map

can I please play it now? lol

tals · Post by **tals** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:53 pm

belgianwaffle31 wrote:I absolutely love this map can I please play it now? lol

Likewise

happysadfun · Post by **happysadfun** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:10 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:Andy quenching.. maybe I should fake quench it.. it worked with hong kong.

Except for the fact that the message said North America.

happysadfun · Post by **happysadfun** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:13 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:... There will be two days for you to post any objections; if no one has posted any protest after two days the map will be deemed finished with the 'Foundry Brand' of approval and will be submitted for live play.....

Post questions and concerns if any.

--Andy

It's almost always more than two days. This message is a bit... outdated.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:04 pm

There are still a few things that are being reworked I believe. Or atleast I said need to be addressed, a page or two back ago.

--Andy

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:12 am

AndyDufresne wrote:I'd have to agree about the ships maybe being too much for everything going on in the map. Maybe removed the ships from that area. Perhaps you could take out the chest, and put one ship there.

Also, perhaps you should consider moving the title a little more to the top right so it doesn't feel scrunched either.

--Andy

Thats the last thing you said.. and I dont think thats really necessary. lets quench this shit.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:03 pm

Visual appeal is a big part of the map.

If maritovw doesn't want to do it, that's fine. I'm still waiting on a response, since all such suggestions and advice must have a response.

--Andy

tals · Post by **tals** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:18 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:I'd have to agree about the ships maybe being too much for everything going on in the map. Maybe removed the ships from that area. Perhaps you could take out the chest, and put one ship there.

Also, perhaps you should consider moving the title a little more to the top right so it doesn't feel scrunched either.

--Andy

These are your last questions. Map looks good to me at the mo. This and Alexanders empire really looking forward to trying.

Tals

maritovw · Post by **maritovw** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 pm

sorry for the delay but i've been very short of time lately due to university and work.... maybe i'll find some time this weekend... maybe...

super steve · Post by **super steve** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:51 pm

its perfectly AWESOME the way it is. just get lack to like put it on the site so we can play it!

Ectomancer · Post by **Ectomancer** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 9:52 pm

Ok, so the mapmaker has to either make suggested changes, or refute the reasoning behind them, or another poster can do it. That's my understanding of the rules here?

Here is my refutation of what seems to be the last remaining objections, coming from Andy.

The changes you request on ships and chest are cosmetic. They not only look fine to me currently, but add character to a great looking map. I'm afraid your suggested change will actually detract from that. I firmly vote against that suggested change.
The skull and crossbones and map name do have some room at the upper right corner to where they can be moved, but they do not interfere with the overall appearance of the map. I am fine with where they are currently. However, I can see where that might bother others. Enough to delay the map? I'm not so sure, especially if a cosmetic change like that could be made after it is live. (actually if that were to happen, I bet only 1 in 10 players would even notice the text had moved 1/4 inch.)

Heimdall · Post by **Heimdall** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:09 am

Looks fine to me. It has my vote

casper · Post by **casper** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:26 am

looks great. the last thing i would do is move THE CARRIBEAN SEA up as suggested before. it's too low.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:22 pm

its taking FOREVER...

Hugh.G.Rection · Post by **Hugh.G.Rection** » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:54 am

it's so close to being finished what's going on?

gavin_sidhu · Post by **gavin_sidhu** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:39 am

Id forgotten all about this map til it was bumped, when will we be seeing it in action?

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:07 pm

damn...come on!

bifgis · Post by **bifgis** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:14 pm

Yeah, guys I want to play this map soooo badly.