Actually they're your words not mine.Napoleon Ier wrote:he just said I was too young to understand.
What I said was that legal philosophy was a complex subject, and that as you've had no formal legal education it would be difficult for you to understand it. Indeed, I'd find it very difficult to explain even the most basic LP concepts over the internet to you in any way that you'd be likely to understand. This is partly because of the difficulty of the subject matter, and partly because of your lack of grounding in basic legal principles.
If you attribute your lack of understanding of legal philosophy, and unreadiness to learn to your age then that's unfortunate. But it's factor which only you brought up.
Congratulations.Napoleon Ier wrote:I mean, I'm not so culturally arrogant as to think there isn't a perfectly good answer to why common law is a viable system with plenty of merits as having a Code Civil does
Well I'm afraid that you're not going to get the kind of answer that you're after. Tou really are only ready to understand lay-grade explanations, not full fledged philosophical considerations.Napoleon Ier wrote:I'm just trying to sucker an answerout of him.or someone less patronizing.
Don't take that as an insult, but Legal Philosophy is an area of human understanding that you're really best off leaving for university or later. If you try to run before you can walk then you'll just end up getting beaten hard by the wrong end of the stick. In simple terms, wait until you've actually learnt some law, then start learning to philosophise about it.
Trust me though, I'd say the same to anybody here. The topic just isn't something that can be properly explained in snappy little internet soundbites, and I don't have the time or inclination to try to run full scale web-based tutorials with you. Sorry, but that's the simple truth of the matter.
If you're really desperate to furnish yourself with knowledge on the matter then go buy yourself a basic textbook on the subject. The topic really isn't something you can bodge your way through by skimming wikipedia, and a professionally published begginers guide is probably your best option at this point in your life. But Nappy, if I were you I'd just hang on a few years and re-kindle your interest after you've actually studied law in an academic setting, what you're trying to do at the moment is the equivalent of trying to learn advanced quantum physics before you've taken your science GCSE.
Au revoir monsieur, we'll chat about this again in a few years time eh?
