Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Fircoal wrote:cena-rules wrote:static_ice wrote:firc iliad or mtg as IK mods?
well maybe not firc but illy and mtg definately
hey.What would be wrong with me as a mod. As for Illy and Mtg I can't really say.
seriously why does everyone can probably not me. IMO Illy and Mtg would probably be worse.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
lalaland wrote: It gives the biggest appearance of inter-forum "fairness" and "equality"
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
lalaland wrote:Personally, I think that posts everywhere should count, as they are all made on CC sponsored forums,
OR
None of the posts anywhere "count" towards a total, and you post to add to a conversation no matter what or where the conversation is.
I personally wouldn't be opposed to the later option, but I think it should be all or nothing. It gives the biggest appearance of inter-forum "fairness" and "equality".
(my 2¢)
Dancing Mustard wrote:lalaland wrote: It gives the biggest appearance of inter-forum "fairness" and "equality"
Crazy talk; those concepts have not yet arrived at CC, we prefer "slavish unquestioning rule adherence" and "arbitrary non-community supported edicts".
Dancing Mustard wrote:All of the above named users would be shit moderators.
Reason: There are lots of much cleverer people than them, and if we've learned one thing from previous CC moderating, it's that stupid people (and I'm not naming any names) make really rubbish mods, and that clever people make decent mods.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:All of the above named users would be shit moderators.
Reason: There are lots of much cleverer people than them, and if we've learned one thing from previous CC moderating, it's that stupid people (and I'm not naming any names) make really rubbish mods, and that clever people make decent mods.
I'm not stupid. >_> And what I've learned from CC modding, is that most of them suck.
Fircoal wrote:I'm not stupid.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
reminisco wrote:i think everyone who is incredibly upset right now, and thinking of reasons why posts should count should take a deep breath, sit down, and think about this for a second:
no argument needs be made by the webmaster or those people he's assigned to moderate his forums on his website. they made their decision, and don't have to justify it to all of us.
at the end of the day, this is still a service. a free service for many, a paid service for others. if the service is unacceptable to your desires, you are free to leave.
since so, so many of you are teenagers and have no fucking clue how the world works (even though, of course you think you do), i'll drop some knowledge on you right now. the greatest power you have, in any situation, is the power to leave. this is the most egalitarian power in a capitalist society. you as the customer have the power to leave, and to not continue to give your money to something you are dissatisfied with.
these same principles apply to those situations arising from being employed, being in a relationship, etc etc etc.
i know this is a long post, but think about it for a minute. if i'm not making sense here, then go back to hyperventilating and creating petitions, or else start growing up. but either way, drop this insipid thread and do something instead of whining.
timmytuttut88 wrote:wow you actually bring up a good point. We do have the option to leave if we want. The thing is we dont understand why they changed this rule in the first place, and basically i say if it isnt broken dont fix it.
reminisco wrote:
not to condescend to you, but i've already told you why they "changed this rule in the first place".
because they wanted to.
they are under no obligation to tell you why they decided to make the change, their reasoning is their own, as the provider of the service with which you are dissatisfied.
reminisco wrote:either man up and adjust to the changing world, or else go beat your head against another wall. the wall you've been butting against has claimed enough of your brain cells by now, or at least, you should realise that at this point, please.
reminisco wrote:i think everyone who is incredibly upset right now, and thinking of reasons why posts should count should take a deep breath, sit down, and think about this for a second:
no argument needs be made by the webmaster or those people he's assigned to moderate his forums on his website. they made their decision, and don't have to justify it to all of us.
at the end of the day, this is still a service. a free service for many, a paid service for others. if the service is unacceptable to your desires, you are free to leave.
since so, so many of you are teenagers and have no fucking clue how the world works (even though, of course you think you do), i'll drop some knowledge on you right now. the greatest power you have, in any situation, is the power to leave. this is the most egalitarian power in a capitalist society. you as the customer have the power to leave, and to not continue to give your money to something you are dissatisfied with.
these same principles apply to those situations arising from being employed, being in a relationship, etc etc etc.
i know this is a long post, but think about it for a minute. if i'm not making sense here, then go back to hyperventilating and creating petitions, or else start growing up. but either way, drop this insipid thread and do something instead of whining.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
reminisco wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:wow you actually bring up a good point. We do have the option to leave if we want. The thing is we dont understand why they changed this rule in the first place, and basically i say if it isnt broken dont fix it.
not to condescend to you, but i've already told you why they "changed this rule in the first place".
because they wanted to.
they are under no obligation to tell you why they decided to make the change, their reasoning is their own, as the provider of the service with which you are dissatisfied.
either man up and adjust to the changing world, or else go beat your head against another wall. the wall you've been butting against has claimed enough of your brain cells by now, or at least, you should realise that at this point, please.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users