The comment was directed at the new kill, not the old one. Now that we have dismissed he theory of drugging their own, they may have done it this time.
I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. And I plan on finding out what that is.
borox0 wrote:The comment was directed at the new kill, not the old one. Now that we have dismissed he theory of drugging their own, they may have done it this time.
ok that doesnt sound completely crazy, but still doesnt smell good to me, we will see, can someone investigate the granny before we do anything rush?
militant wrote:But we cannot share our results now, so even if Borox investigates said granny, it will be of no help to the town since, we cannot share it
I think we just can't share observations, but other investigations are fine.
militant wrote:But we cannot share our results now, so even if Borox investigates said granny, it will be of no help to the town since, we cannot share it
I think we just can't share observations, but other investigations are fine.
Oh okay
Anyway, I have reason to suspect Skoffin. I observed her, and found out something that incriminates her. Fos Skoffin for now.
Guys I am intentionally lurking. Discuss; Play mafia, it is good. Oderint Dum Metuant says: Don't confuse the easily confused!
militant wrote:But we cannot share our results now, so even if Borox investigates said granny, it will be of no help to the town since, we cannot share it
I think we just can't share observations, but other investigations are fine.
Oh okay
Anyway, I have reason to suspect Skoffin. I observed her, and found out something that incriminates her. Fos Skoffin for now.
Not sure if this is true or just a scum bluff. Im hinting towards the possibility that it's true since you FOSed her instead of jumping with a vote. Subliminally this means that the evidence is either weak or you need skoffin herself to clear this up.
militant wrote:Anyway, I have reason to suspect Skoffin. I observed her, and found out something that incriminates her. Fos Skoffin for now.
I know what you are refferring to, I will however not clarify what it is at this time as you yourself will find out what it is shortly. If you still find me suspect at that time then feel free to make due with the information and I will explain what it means.
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
militant wrote:Anyway, I have reason to suspect Skoffin. I observed her, and found out something that incriminates her. Fos Skoffin for now.
I know what you are refferring to, I will however not clarify what it is at this time as you yourself will find out what it is shortly. If you still find me suspect at that time then feel free to make due with the information and I will explain what it means.
Even thought skoffin logic seems flawless, and for a defense seems quite convincing, there is one catch, if the incriminating evidence was acquired via observation no matter what him cant share it with us, so we can only count in his word, him either clears you after him learns dunno what, or get firmer and votes you.
Sorry my activity level is seriously dropping I hate when people play like I am so dito you should replace me. I could play on but I would be half the player I normally would be. Sorry Dito.
okay, I'll find a replacement. (your last post here won't count, since it's not in-character or even game-related.) Would you mind having a short PM discussion with your replacement, getting them up-to-date? I've got the major scenes stored, and will send them, but I don't remember everything from your perspective.
militant wrote:Anyway, I have reason to suspect Skoffin. I observed her, and found out something that incriminates her. Fos Skoffin for now.
I know what you are refferring to, I will however not clarify what it is at this time as you yourself will find out what it is shortly. If you still find me suspect at that time then feel free to make due with the information and I will explain what it means.
Even thought skoffin logic seems flawless, and for a defense seems quite convincing, there is one catch, if the incriminating evidence was acquired via observation no matter what him cant share it with us, so we can only count in his word, him either clears you after him learns dunno what, or get firmer and votes you.
Heh, I didn't think of that. Well then If he still believes me to be suspect then can vote me and I'll explain, and if he doesn't then he can drop it I guess. Though come to think of it I should probably make sure we are thinking of the same thing, however trying to find loops through the new observe rules might make the mod cross so I should probably check first before I say more.
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
- You cannot say who you are going to observe. - You cannot say who you have observed, or what you found out. - You may investigate two people per day, unless you are mafia. - If you are asked about an specific observation, then you may talk about it. (If person A asks person B, "did you observe person C?", person B is not allowed to say yes or no. But if A asks B, "Is person C out of breath?", then B is allowed to talk about that such as, "I haven't noticed if they are", or "yeah, very." If C asks B, "Did you notice that I'm out of breath?" then B is allowed to talk about it as well.
*evil grin*
But basically, I don't want you talking about the observations on distrustful days.
mr. incrediball wrote:i'm confuzzled. skoff, is it possible to tell us how borox will find out? or would that be giving away his observation?
He'd be told I'd imagine. And it was Mili who observed me.
Annnyway, I *think* I understand what Dito just said..so I guess I should start asking questions eh? Mili, did what you observe have anything to do with bombs or something of that nature?
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.