Known abusers of the system

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
zimmah
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: VDLL

Known abusers of the system

Post by zimmah »

post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
[bigimg]http://sense4seo.nl/signatures/sig-zimmah.jpg[/bigimg]
User avatar
jako
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 5:50 am
Gender: Male
Location: A lost soul with no-one to stalk.

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by jako »

i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater. :lol:
Image

Time to retire this much loved sig of mine with a new clan.
User avatar
Anarkistsdream
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
Gender: Male

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Anarkistsdream »

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

Whine much?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
detlef
Posts: 1125
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by detlef »

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

:roll: Bother...
Image
User avatar
zimmah
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: VDLL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by zimmah »

jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater. :lol:


it is
[bigimg]http://sense4seo.nl/signatures/sig-zimmah.jpg[/bigimg]
User avatar
DiM
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by DiM »

why am i not surprised johnny is listed? :roll:
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Soloman
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: The dirty south
Contact:

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Soloman »

DiM wrote:why am i not surprised johnny is listed? :roll:
...
You Have 2 choices,You can either Agree With Me or Be Wrong!!! http://www.myspace.com/solomanthewise http://360.yahoo.com/bolar35
User avatar
xxtig12683xx
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Gender: Male
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by xxtig12683xx »

zimmah wrote:
jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater. :lol:


it is



What are you, the ratings police? :lol:


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Soloman
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: The dirty south
Contact:

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Soloman »

xxtig12683xx wrote:
zimmah wrote:
jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater. :lol:


it is



What are you, the ratings police? :lol:


-tig
As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...
You Have 2 choices,You can either Agree With Me or Be Wrong!!! http://www.myspace.com/solomanthewise http://360.yahoo.com/bolar35
User avatar
xxtig12683xx
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Gender: Male
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by xxtig12683xx »

Soloman wrote:
xxtig12683xx wrote:
zimmah wrote:
jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater. :lol:


it is



What are you, the ratings police? :lol:


-tig
As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...



And giving 5's is abuse how? Thats the only thing i want left for me, and thats all ive left for people...gosh dang'it i must be abusing the system.


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
White Moose
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:33 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by White Moose »

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat


I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.
Image
Highest Score: 3374
User avatar
gdeangel
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:48 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the Basement

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by gdeangel »

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat



This enforcer crap is a joke. Anyone who plays at 100% and make an enjoyable game, you can expect a 5 from me, and I'd expect a 5 back if I play at 100% and its also a good game for you. Leave me a 3 without cause, expect a 1 on the grounds of being a tool.

Ahha, so you think... I'll just wait... until the feedback opportunity is about to roll off... and then... haha... when you can't reciprocate... haha... I'll leave you an "average" rating. If that's you, then you're officially a tool.
My ever constant two last games seem to have no end in sight!
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13078
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by owenshooter »

show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
gdeangel
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:48 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the Basement

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by gdeangel »

owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0


I must have read that post wrong... Owen, did you just agree with me!!!!
My ever constant two last games seem to have no end in sight!
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by wicked »

zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.
User avatar
Soloman
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: The dirty south
Contact:

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Soloman »

owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
You Have 2 choices,You can either Agree With Me or Be Wrong!!! http://www.myspace.com/solomanthewise http://360.yahoo.com/bolar35
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13078
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by owenshooter »

Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
xxtig12683xx
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Gender: Male
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by xxtig12683xx »

owenshooter wrote:
Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0



Him not her ;)


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
alyzMAMA
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:37 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Brooklyn NY
Contact:

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by alyzMAMA »

why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing" :roll: anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it. =D>
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13078
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by owenshooter »

alyzMAMA wrote:why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing" :roll: anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it. =D>

thank you, cute little baby!!! QFT!!!-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Soloman
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: The dirty south
Contact:

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Soloman »

owenshooter wrote:
Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...
You Have 2 choices,You can either Agree With Me or Be Wrong!!! http://www.myspace.com/solomanthewise http://360.yahoo.com/bolar35
User avatar
Bones2484
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA (G1)

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by Bones2484 »

Soloman wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0

yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...


But where does it tell us what is "average" and what is "bad" and what is "excellent"? Last time I checked, it's all a matter of opinion.
User avatar
zimmah
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: VDLL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by zimmah »

White Moose wrote:
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat


I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.


78 out of 78 players that deserve a 5? i don't think so. either he's playing only with the very elite players (and i don't mean skills) or he is just hading out random 5's which is abusing the system.
[bigimg]http://sense4seo.nl/signatures/sig-zimmah.jpg[/bigimg]
User avatar
zimmah
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: VDLL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by zimmah »

wicked wrote:zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.


so you're practictly telling it is true what i say.

i know though you're right, some people need more time to get used to common sence but if you do nothing against it, they might start to think it's normal what they do, which it's not. (or is it?)
[bigimg]http://sense4seo.nl/signatures/sig-zimmah.jpg[/bigimg]
User avatar
zimmah
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: VDLL

Re: Known abusers of the system

Post by zimmah »

Soloman wrote:
owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
I think his argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.


yes, only i want to keep it simple for them :lol:
[bigimg]http://sense4seo.nl/signatures/sig-zimmah.jpg[/bigimg]
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”