jangler3 wrote:But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him.
The fact that he can't see what rating you left until it's too late to rate you.
And that.But he is now on my foe list
Moderator: Community Team
jangler3 wrote:But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him.
And that.But he is now on my foe list
well the design in the rating system is that, he cant see what rating u gave him till the game archives, so by that time, whatever rating he gave u will reflect what he really thought and not retaliatory rating.jangler3 wrote:I think you miss...You miss out. Since the deferred armies rule has started you get all kind of excuses. I just got kicked from a gamethat has a player, that has missed 4 out of 11 rounds. I can handles a miss but 4!? Defanitly using as an advantage.
So he has a bad rating from me. And I told him on his wall. But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him. But he is now on my foe list, so One down.

first of all, deferred armies are better than the old rule when they got the armies on the next turn. now THAT was an advantage. there is no advantage, you can attack the person that missed their turn and limit their armies. if you limit them to 3 armies, guess what? they only get 3 at the start and 3 at the end of their turn. people tend to not try to limit the armies of the person missing, and assume they are gone. that is how you get beat by someone missing turns. if you miss turns, it is not an advantage in a game with an experienced or responsible player. and as far as the rating goes, he can't see what you leave him until it is too late to leave a retaliatory rating...-0jangler3 wrote:I think you miss...You miss out. Since the deferred armies rule has started you get all kind of excuses. I just got kicked from a gamethat has a player, that has missed 4 out of 11 rounds. I can handles a miss but 4!? Defanitly using as an advantage.
So he has a bad rating from me. And I told him on his wall. But what is to stop him from giving me a bad rating because of mine towards him. But he is now on my foe list, so One down.

Iron Butterfly wrote:I cant beleive your repeating what was said earlier in this thread...sigh.
i can't believe that this is all you had to had to the discussion...-0Iron Butterfly wrote:I cant beleive your repeating what was said earlier in this thread...sigh.

I think if you look at what I said. I called his comment an "asshat comment." For saying something he has no knowledge on. Similar to you repeating what others said in the 2 previous posts. Just have to post something to seem important...owenshooter wrote:p.s.-did you really use the term "asshat" in an attempt to insult someone? wow, name calling!!!! so mature...
oh, you are one of those people that posts in a thread and expects everyone to agree with them, and then when they don't, name calling begins. you posted what the OP posted, so why can't i respond to you, like others responded to the OP and other comments? please, tell me how responding to you is so wrong. teach me the ways of the forum, oh sage...-0jangler3 wrote:I think if you look at what I said. I called his comment an "asshat comment." For saying something he has no knowledge on. Similar to you repeating what others said in the 2 previous posts. Just have to post something to seem important...owenshooter wrote:p.s.-did you really use the term "asshat" in an attempt to insult someone? wow, name calling!!!! so mature...

So, your lack of understanding something, equates to him being a "zzzzzzzzzzzz-ero"?jangler3 wrote:^^^ I don't even know what that means. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz-ero
psst... about 2 hours too late! we took it to PM's, but thank you for the friendly reminder!! and on that note, deferred armies rock!-0wicked wrote:and what does any of this have to do with deferred armies? back on track guys..

Just for the record, You took it to PM's. Deferred armies suck.owenshooter wrote:psst... about 2 hours too late! we took it to PM's, but thank you for the friendly reminder!! and on that note, deferred armies rock!-0wicked wrote:and what does any of this have to do with deferred armies? back on track guys..