Moderator: Community Team
ctwong1 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:ctwong1 wrote:I think it is fair to assume, that if you take the "Yes" votes and add them to the "Refuse to answer" votes, the majority of people on here have voted that Wicked is back to her old ways of inconsistencies, so far.
Almost the majority, exactly 50% atm.
50% vs. 42%
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
ctwong1 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:ctwong1 wrote:I think it is fair to assume, that if you take the "Yes" votes and add them to the "Refuse to answer" votes, the majority of people on here have voted that Wicked is back to her old ways of inconsistencies, so far.
Almost the majority, exactly 50% atm.
Make that 51% v. 41%
ctwong1 wrote:ctwong1 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:ctwong1 wrote:I think it is fair to assume, that if you take the "Yes" votes and add them to the "Refuse to answer" votes, the majority of people on here have voted that Wicked is back to her old ways of inconsistencies, so far.
Almost the majority, exactly 50% atm.
Make that 51% v. 41%
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
It should also be taken into consideration the original title was Out the Mods Being Wicked again. And for neophytes to the issue they may have voted not knowing that it was actually wicked being referred to they may have been believing it could have been any mod on the site at the time...deliaselene wrote:actually another way to look at the votes is that almost 60% have concerns...
Soloman wrote:It should also be taken into consideration the original title was Out the Mods Being Wicked again. And for neophytes to the issue they may have voted not knowing that it was actually wicked being referred to they may have been believing it could have been any mod on the site at the time...deliaselene wrote:actually another way to look at the votes is that almost 60% have concerns...
Also the Wicked Bashing does get old, I know some people have had problems with her, sometimes I believe she over reacted in situations after review of the facts and in other She did what she was supposed to. She is human remember that. Also back to my original statement she is not the only mod on this site to be flip floppy or illogical in the decisions they make and while she may be one of the most vocal her unpopular actions are not something she has the exclusive title to doing amongst mods...
Calm down Owen i read it before and after the title change remember that the title change did not happen till 4 pages of comments occurred so relax I was just making a valid and objective point.owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:It should also be taken into consideration the original title was Out the Mods Being Wicked again. And for neophytes to the issue they may have voted not knowing that it was actually wicked being referred to they may have been believing it could have been any mod on the site at the time...deliaselene wrote:actually another way to look at the votes is that almost 60% have concerns...
Also the Wicked Bashing does get old, I know some people have had problems with her, sometimes I believe she over reacted in situations after review of the facts and in other She did what she was supposed to. She is human remember that. Also back to my original statement she is not the only mod on this site to be flip floppy or illogical in the decisions they make and while she may be one of the most vocal her unpopular actions are not something she has the exclusive title to doing amongst mods...
read the thread. she asked wong to change the title to what it is now... *rolling my eyes*...-0
Soloman wrote:Calm down Owen i read it before and after the title change remember that the title change did not happen till 4 pages of comments occurred so relax I was just making a valid and objective point.
trapyoung wrote:oh huzzah, owen is back.
Timminz wrote:trapyoung wrote:oh huzzah, owen is back.
Keep it on topic....
deliaselene wrote:Timminz wrote:trapyoung wrote:oh huzzah, owen is back.
Keep it on topic....
valid point...keep it on topic ... so has wicked been wicked again?
owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:Calm down Owen i read it before and after the title change remember that the title change did not happen till 4 pages of comments occurred so relax I was just making a valid and objective point.
*rolling my eyes even more* didn't see where i lost my cool... is this thread dead yet? jeez...-0
Soloman wrote:owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:Calm down Owen i read it before and after the title change remember that the title change did not happen till 4 pages of comments occurred so relax I was just making a valid and objective point.
*rolling my eyes even more* didn't see where i lost my cool... is this thread dead yet? jeez...-0
The rolling your eyes and jumping on my comment generally is indicative of losing cool... I think a lot of the mods can be wicked at times and that they conflict with each other and do irrational or illogical things at times like most humans do. the only once that do not are robots, vampires or aliens...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Timminz wrote:deliaselene wrote:Timminz wrote:trapyoung wrote:oh huzzah, owen is back.
Keep it on topic....
valid point...keep it on topic ... so has wicked been wicked again?
Probably, (aren't we all sometimes?) but that's none of our business. Oh wait....you meant here in CC land... I don't really feel I should answer the question in the thread title, as it is a non-sequitur. Answering it would imply that I agree with the pre-supposed notion that wicked has been wicked in the past. That's not to say that I disagree, just that I don't like being pushed around by a question.
deliaselene wrote:so that would have been a vote for maybe...might be...but...
Timminz wrote:deliaselene wrote:so that would have been a vote for maybe...might be...but...
Something like that.
deliaselene wrote:Timminz wrote:deliaselene wrote:so that would have been a vote for maybe...might be...but...
Something like that.
well at least you have a sense of humour in addition to your honesty... wicked does not appreciate humour nor can she spell it
