Anyway, I'll roleclaim, if just because It's incredibly ironic. Wait for it... I'm a survivor.
Moderator: Community Team

virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

ace1217 wrote:WTF is this? Someone needs to figure out who said this and how its importantInnervision wrote:So a military technician goes to work on a firing range. He's given a rifle and some rounds, and he starts to fire at the target. When he's done, the report comes back that he's missed every single time.
The technician looks at his rifle, looks at the target. Rifle. Target. Rifle. Target. Finally, he puts a finger in front of the rifle and fires a shot, blowing his finger off.
He looks towards the target and yells 'Well, it's leaving here fine, the problem must be on your end!'
I'd say that sounds authentic and you have a reason to do the vote counts- aside from Skoff being too lazy...Ditocoaf wrote:right. I'm Thucydides, a historian. That's why I have to take the vote counts.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.


EBWOP Unvote Vote Ditoicedagger wrote: Vote DIto Sorry dito but if we're gonna let people off after a survivor claim we'll never get to night one
What?!?!icedagger wrote: Vote DIto Sorry dito but if we're gonna let people off after a survivor claim we'll never get to night one
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Indeed it is easy to fake a claim, but still I would rather lynch scum than town/third party. And I not sure if this is what you're saying, but are suggesting he lie about his role? If anything, that hurts the town more than anything. I would much rather wait one night on an investigative role than to lynch someone who can do no harm to the town. And that's besides the fact that if he is a survivor, that doesn't help town at all to kill him at this point.icedagger wrote:He's claimed survivor, if we were certain he was a survivor of course I wouldn't vote him. And we'd be better off if the mafia targeted him, survivor with no power is pretty much the role we can afford to lose most..
My point is, if someone's got to the point where they need to roleclaim, their role needs to be better than survior to avert a lynch. Or we'll end up with everyone claimed and no one lynched.. it's not hard to fake a role in a game like this
Sorry for the double post, but to address this, SkoffinSkoffin wrote:Quoted because F1fth has also 'gotten pissy and quitted mafia over it'F1fth wrote:If you wanna know why people are voting you right now, it's this kind of behavior. When some people voted for a new guy (I don't even think they were serious votes), you got pissy with them. Some people voted you, you got pissy with them. And now you're going to quit the game because of it?
How immature. You're taking this freaking game personally, and if you don't see that THAT is the problem here, I guess you have a lot of growing up to do.![]()
Actually, I think I've done the same thing..several times. So Frankly I'm not sure whether Dito is absolutely serious or if he'll cool off by tomorrow and continue on.
Anyway, I'll start prodding players in the morning.
What are you on about? I'm not pushing a non-scum lynch, we have no idea whether dito is scum or not. You seem to be advocating a no-lynch today.. going straight to night helps no one but scum.F1fth wrote:Indeed it is easy to fake a claim, but still I would rather lynch scum than town/third party. And I not sure if this is what you're saying, but are suggesting he lie about his role? If anything, that hurts the town more than anything. I would much rather wait one night on an investigative role than to lynch someone who can do no harm to the town. And that's besides the fact that if he is a survivor, that doesn't help town at all to kill him at this point.icedagger wrote:He's claimed survivor, if we were certain he was a survivor of course I wouldn't vote him. And we'd be better off if the mafia targeted him, survivor with no power is pretty much the role we can afford to lose most..
My point is, if someone's got to the point where they need to roleclaim, their role needs to be better than survior to avert a lynch. Or we'll end up with everyone claimed and no one lynched.. it's not hard to fake a role in a game like this
Unvote Dito
FOS icedagger for pushing a non-scum lynch.
he just told us to vote for him. . .I don't think that he's gonna be around much longer anyway.Fircoal wrote:Dito, don't leave. You're cool
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
He's only stealing the power.william18 wrote:What do yuo mean?The1exile wrote:you guys do know that the kirby eat isn't actually like eating them and them dying, right?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
It sounds skoffin-ish and authentic, but this post just made me reconsider about unvoting. My vote stands 'till this is explained.Ditocoaf wrote: Also, I was only doing the vote counts to set myself up for this fake claim.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
32 alive, 17 to lynch is what dito is forgetting in his vote countsace1217 wrote:How many votes need to be in dito before he gets lynched?
if you haven't played super smash bros, go get an N64 emulator f0r your PC, download it, and play kirby. Then you will understand.william18 wrote:What do yuo mean?