The cover of New York Times

danvoy9787 · Post by **danvoy9787** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:47 am

is effing HILARIOUS whether obama is secretly an american hating muslim or not!

bbqpenguin · Post by **bbqpenguin** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:53 am

i thought it was pretty funny, though i think a lot of people *including obama himself) lost the message of the picture. the picture isn't criticizing obama, it's actually making fun of all the people who attack him with silly accusation (i.e. he's a terrorist, his wi'fe a nappy headed ho' from da hood, he burns american flags, etc. of course now everyone who didn't take half a minute and think about the cartoon instead is instantly jumping on the racism bandwagon. btw, it wasn't the new york times...

danvoy9787 · Post by **danvoy9787** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:57 am

yea. i know it isnt... what was it again?

crap new york somethin...
who cares its a queer city anyway!!!!

hahahhaah

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:00 am

NY Times are fucking IDIOTS. They completely fucked up a friend's life by printing a story about him and refusing to hide his identity when terrorists and whack-job extremists here in the US are going to now be after him because of the story. They also embellished part of the story to sensationalize it. I refuse to read anything those lying idiot nutjobs ever publish again.

Hologram · Post by **Hologram** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:08 am

It's the New Yorker. That's all I have to say because I don't care about it. But get your shit straight.

whitestazn88 · Post by **whitestazn88** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:52 am

wicked wrote:NY Times are fucking IDIOTS. They completely fucked up a friend's life by printing a story about him and refusing to hide his identity when terrorists and whack-job extremists here in the US are going to now be after him because of the story. They also embellished part of the story to sensationalize it. I refuse to read anything those lying idiot nutjobs ever publish again.

are you saying you're obama's friend??? is he a member of CC??? Is it mobajog (sp?)??? the name looks kinda like obama if you don't pay attention.....

wrestler1ump · Post by **wrestler1ump** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:27 am

wicked wrote:NY Times are fucking IDIOTS. They completely fucked up a friend's life by printing a story about him and refusing to hide his identity when terrorists and whack-job extremists here in the US are going to now be after him because of the story. They also embellished part of the story to sensationalize it. I refuse to read anything those lying idiot nutjobs ever publish again.

Was it Gary Brolsma?

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:09 am

Link please? I'm in France...

btownmeggy · Post by **btownmeggy** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:07 am

Hologram wrote:It's the New Yorker. That's all I have to say because I don't care about it. But get your shit straight.

I was so worried I would read through this entire thread and no one would mention this.

The mistake indicates that most of the people commenting have 1. Never read the most important newspaper in the United States; 2. Never read the most important literary journal in the United States.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:51 am

danvoy9787 wrote:yea. i know it isnt... what was it again?

crap new york somethin...
who cares its a queer city anyway!!!!

hahahhaah

Well it certainly isn't Bumfuck Iowa where you live.

And you really should learn to tell the difference between a Magazine and a Newspaper. :lol:

(PS...you have Hay in your teeth)

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:19 am

btownmeggy wrote:
Hologram wrote:It's the New Yorker. That's all I have to say because I don't care about it. But get your shit straight.

I was so worried I would read through this entire thread and no one would mention this.

The mistake indicates that most of the people commenting have 1. Never read the most important newspaper in the United States; 2. Never read the most important literary journal in the United States.

That worried me too, and I hadn't even heard of this. I've googled it now, and all I have to say is wow. Just wow.

This thread and the world in general...

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:28 am

So, the picture was intended ironically, according to a few googled sources, but many worry that it might be taken literally (a "recruitment poster" for the right); what does everyone think about this?

Here it is, in case anyone missed it...

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:34 am

InkL0sed wrote:
btownmeggy wrote:
Hologram wrote:It's the New Yorker. That's all I have to say because I don't care about it. But get your shit straight.

I was so worried I would read through this entire thread and no one would mention this.

The mistake indicates that most of the people commenting have 1. Never read the most important newspaper in the United States; 2. Never read the most important literary journal in the United States.

That worried me too, and I hadn't even heard of this. I've googled it now, and all I have to say is wow. Just wow.

This thread and the world in general...

I knew it was the New Yorker, i just saw an oppty to bash the NY times and took it. :lol:

And no way in HELL the Ny Times is the most important newspaper anywhere except the bottom of a bird cage. They're lying bastards, but I digress...

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:36 am

I think it's quite obviously satire, given that it is the New Yorker.

I mean seriously. How could this be taken the wrong way? Even if someone decides to kill him or something because of it, it's not like they weren't on the edge to begin with. And that's a rather huge if.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:59 am

This is a joke. It is mocking the ignorant who didn't know what the "fist bump" was!

Can you believe there are actually people out there who thought that it was some kind of "secret cult handshake"? :lol:

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:21 pm

Neoteny wrote:So, the picture was intended ironically, according to a few googled sources, but many worry that it might be taken literally (a "recruitment poster" for the right); what does everyone think about this?

Here it is, in case anyone missed it...

Why does it say "July 21" when it's only the 17th, it's obviously a conspiracy!

danvoy9787 · Post by **danvoy9787** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:34 pm

Backglass wrote:
danvoy9787 wrote:yea. i know it isnt... what was it again?

crap new york somethin...
who cares its a queer city anyway!!!!

hahahhaah

Well it certainly isn't Bumfuck Iowa where you live.

And you really should learn to tell the difference between a Magazine and a Newspaper.

(PS...you have Hay in your teeth)

well seeing as i dont leave even freakin NEAR New York, and seeing how im not into that kind of shit
I read Popular Science, and Popular Mechanics myself.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:54 pm

Hologram wrote:It's the New Yorker. That's all I have to say because I don't care about it. But get your shit straight.

Amen, brother.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:05 pm

danvoy9787 wrote:well seeing as i dont leave even freakin NEAR New York, and seeing how im not into that kind of shit
I read Popular Science, and Popular Mechanics myself.

I am not at all surprised. :lol:

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:18 pm

danvoy9787 wrote:
well seeing as i dont leave even freakin NEAR New York, and seeing how im not into that kind of shit
I read Popular Science, and Popular Mechanics myself.

You also apparently never learned how to read and write.

The cover of New York Times

The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times

Re: The cover of New York Times