One shot, One kill [Winner: bradlyg]

smellyfungus · Post by **smellyfungus** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:53 pm

Game 1 - Round Six. Lets hope no one wins in 5

sirfrogger · Post by **sirfrogger** » Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:06 am

sirfrogger WINS round 6

scorpion86 · Post by **scorpion86** » Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:05 pm

Game 64
scorpion86 in 6

shaneramma · Post by **shaneramma** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:12 pm

Tournament Game: One Shot, One Kill - Game 42
[game]2771718[/game]

shaneramma wins, round 7...

looks like i missed it by one round.

TaCktiX · Post by **TaCktiX** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:19 pm

TaCktiX won, 6 rounds in [game]2771694[/game].

Seems like 6 is the lucky number.

smellyfungus · Post by **smellyfungus** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:26 pm

shouldnt whoever won in the lowest amounts of turn be put into a final showdown kinda thing rather then redoing those games?

TaCktiX · Post by **TaCktiX** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:48 pm

I agree with sillyfungus. We're ending up with nearly a full game's worth of people who have won in 6 rounds. And when you think about it, the people who successfully won that quick will be ganged up on and eliminated by the people who more than likely lost in one sweeping stroke (I eliminated all 7 other people in round 6). That's not fair to the people who were able to pull off a really quick victory, the essence of this tournament. I also think that nate wasn't expecting a tie of such magnitude, and the larger size should justify a playoff instead of a re-play.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:36 pm

TaCktiX wrote:I agree with sillyfungus. We're ending up with nearly a full game's worth of people who have won in 6 rounds. And when you think about it, the people who successfully won that quick will be ganged up on and eliminated by the people who more than likely lost in one sweeping stroke (I eliminated all 7 other people in round 6). That's not fair to the people who were able to pull off a really quick victory, the essence of this tournament. I also think that nate wasn't expecting a tie of such magnitude, and the larger size should justify a playoff instead of a re-play.

Looking at the numbers it may be best course... but lets wait and see how many round 6 (and see if anyone can pull off a round 5!) before making any officially decisions... but i think if we have more then 8 6 wins then we will do this

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:52 pm

I have a game list here, i will delete games from this list whenever they have gone past the winner round number.
CURRENTLY - 10 players in first place! but more then half the games are still active, is it possible for a player to win in 5 rounds? If it is we are likelly to see it in a tournament of this scale

Game 1 - Round 6 - smellyfungus
Game 2 - Round 6 - Thomo1970
Game 4 - Round 6 - Luvr
Game 8 - Round 6 - dittoeevee8888
Game 22 - Round 6 - sirfrogger
Game 24 - Round 6 - jrhockey21
Game 27 - Round 6 - TaCktiX
Game 31 - Round 6 - pempi
Game 54 - Round 6 - bradlyg
Game 64 - Round 6 - scorpion86

Game 5

Game 6

Game 7

Game 10

Game 11

Game 15

Game 17 - Round 6 - banana_hammocks

Game 20

Game 21

Game 25

Game 28

Game 29

Game 32

Game 33

Game 36

Game 37

Game 38

Game 39

Game 40

Game 41

Game 43

Game 44

Game 46

Game 47

Game 50

Game 51

Game 56

Game 59

Game 61

Game 65

smellyfungus · Post by **smellyfungus** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:46 pm

yeah as long as there are an even amount of winners then we can just make 2 games of 5 or whatever. cause we might just end up with another set of 6 round wins and so on.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:26 pm

smellyfungus wrote:yeah as long as there are an even amount of winners then we can just make 2 games of 5 or whatever. cause we might just end up with another set of 6 round wins and so on.

that is IF noone wins in round 5... one player (pempi) said he was 1 unit short of winning in round 5, so it obviously is a possibility

smellyfungus · Post by **smellyfungus** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:17 pm

im just gonna ignore the chance of a round 5 win. it makes me feel better inside.

scorpion86 · Post by **scorpion86** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:05 pm

Looks like there will be enough 6 rnd winners for a nice 2nd rnd. it might even take 3 or 4 with a field of this size.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:28 am

This time around i only added 2 names to the winner and alot more games have ended, below are your winners, 12 so far, and under that are the games that still have a chance at winning or tieing
Game 1 - Round 6 - smellyfungus
Game 2 - Round 6 - Thomo1970
Game 4 - Round 6 - Luvr
Game 8 - Round 6 - dittoeevee8888
Game 17 - Round 6 - banana_hammocks
Game 21 - Round 6 - Spijker81
Game 22 - Round 6 - sirfrogger
Game 24 - Round 6 - jrhockey21
Game 27 - Round 6 - TaCktiX
Game 31 - Round 6 - pempi
Game 54 - Round 6 - bradlyg
Game 64 - Round 6 - scorpion86

Game 6

Game 10

Game 15

Game 20

Game 25

Game 29

Game 32

Game 38

Game 39

Game 41

Game 43

Game 44

Game 46

Game 56

Game 59

Game 61

Game 65

Kernal_Kronic · Post by **Kernal_Kronic** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:50 am

Dadnabit, looks like i missed it by 1...Game 2771724 Round 7

Slasher966 · Post by **Slasher966** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:28 pm

I won game 46 in 6 rounds

game 46 - 6 rounds - Slasher966

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:16 am

Not alot of update today, 1 more player won in round 6, while 3 more games went past round 6
Game 1 - Round 6 - smellyfungus
Game 2 - Round 6 - Thomo1970
Game 4 - Round 6 - Luvr
Game 8 - Round 6 - dittoeevee8888
Game 17 - Round 6 - banana_hammocks
Game 21 - Round 6 - Spijker81
Game 22 - Round 6 - sirfrogger
Game 24 - Round 6 - jrhockey21
Game 27 - Round 6 - TaCktiX
Game 31 - Round 6 - pempi
Game 46 - Round 6 - Slasher966
Game 54 - Round 6 - bradlyg
Game 64 - Round 6 - scorpion86

Game 6

Game 10

Game 15

Game 20

Game 25

Game 29

Game 32

Game 38

Game 39

Game 41

Game 43

Game 44

Game 61

Game 65

Assassin07 · Post by **Assassin07** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:21 pm

i won my game round 7

TaCktiX · Post by **TaCktiX** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:34 am

If anything we've proven by large sample size that with competent people who want to win no game of Escalating Classic can be won in fewer than 6 rounds.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:20 am

TaCktiX wrote:If anything we've proven by large sample size that with competent people who want to win no game of Escalating Classic can be won in fewer than 6 rounds.

i dont think thats quite true, i think its VERY hard, but like i said earlier, pempi... he was 1 army short of winning in round 5. Which means 1 single dice roll better and he would probably win this tourny... so not impossible, just ALOT of work ALOT of planning and ALOT of luck(probably this more then any)

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:27 am

I hope noone wins in under 6 rounds, I want to be able to win, and that can only happen if noone beats 6 rounds.

millertime13 · Post by **millertime13** » Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:16 am

Game #2771689 I won in round 7.

Natewolfman · Post by **Natewolfman** » Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:56 pm

alot more games eliminated this update

Game 1 - Round 6 - smellyfungus
Game 2 - Round 6 - Thomo1970
Game 4 - Round 6 - Luvr
Game 8 - Round 6 - dittoeevee8888
Game 17 - Round 6 - banana_hammocks
Game 21 - Round 6 - Spijker81
Game 22 - Round 6 - sirfrogger
Game 24 - Round 6 - jrhockey21
Game 27 - Round 6 - TaCktiX
Game 31 - Round 6 - pempi
Game 46 - Round 6 - Slasher966
Game 54 - Round 6 - bradlyg
Game 64 - Round 6 - scorpion86

Game 15

Game 38

Game 39

Game 41

Game 44

Game 61

Game 65

KoE_Alin · Post by **KoE_Alin** » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:07 pm

game #2771670 i won in round 7 grrr

oh well...waiting for your next tourney

smellyfungus · Post by **smellyfungus** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:13 pm

all the rounder fivers are gone. so it looks like were moving on to another set of games.

One shot, One kill [Winner: bradlyg]

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)

Re: One shot, One kill (Reserves)