It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

Nikolai wrote:Most US states have some kind of smoking regulation these days... Good thing, too.



Nah man, it's the worst thing to happen to humanity since bush.
Last edited by Snorri1234 on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
Nikolai
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:11 pm

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Nikolai »

I say good thing because I got tired of having to breathe through my shirt every time some dumbass lit up in a small area... I (apparently) have sensitive lungs and a family history of asthma. So... I'm gonna stick with good thing.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by pimpdave »

Nikolai wrote:I say good thing because I got tired of having to breathe through my shirt every time some dumbass lit up in a small area... I (apparently) have sensitive lungs and a family history of asthma. So... I'm gonna stick with good thing.


Yes, I agree. To Snorri, I must ask, if indoor smoking regulations are horrible, then what about regulations concerning spitting in public?

(back when Tuberculosis was significantly more common, spitting in public was a serious public health issue)
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Frigidus »

pimpdave wrote:
Nikolai wrote:I say good thing because I got tired of having to breathe through my shirt every time some dumbass lit up in a small area... I (apparently) have sensitive lungs and a family history of asthma. So... I'm gonna stick with good thing.


Yes, I agree. To Snorri, I must ask, if indoor smoking regulations are horrible, then what about regulations concerning spitting in public?

(back when Tuberculosis was significantly more common, spitting in public was a serious public health issue)


It's illegal to do that somewhere? What do you do if you have to spit?
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by pimpdave »

Frigidus wrote:
It's illegal to do that somewhere? What do you do if you have to spit?


There are ordinances in place pretty much everywhere (it's not going to get you locked up, just a ticket, from a conscientious cop -- like smoking indoors). You don't travel much, do you?
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

pimpdave wrote:
Nikolai wrote:I say good thing because I got tired of having to breathe through my shirt every time some dumbass lit up in a small area... I (apparently) have sensitive lungs and a family history of asthma. So... I'm gonna stick with good thing.


Yes, I agree. To Snorri, I must ask, if indoor smoking regulations are horrible, then what about regulations concerning spitting in public?



Well I don't mean all of the regulations are horrible. I can get behind on smoking being banned on trains, public buildings and more of that, I just really hate the smoking-bans in bars. I mean, yeah sure in a restaurant it's annoying and ruins the food too so yay for banning it there, but in fucking bars???

And spitting in public is uhm....nice? I don't know, i've never even heard of it being bad. And since second-hand smoke is really not that bad for you unless you live in a small room your entire life with a smoker I just can't see the deal.

I also think the whole "imposed on us" thing is the worst. A bar just honestly can't decide to allow smoking even if everyone in there including the personnel have no issue with it. That's just bullshit governments telling us what to do like what conservatists are always jammering about. Seriously, all that bitching and moaning about the gov telling you what to do with guns and you're fine with them telling you where to smoke/drink or make noise?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by pimpdave »

On that point, I do agree. Smoking should be permitted in bars. Ideally, it would split the market, so that smokers could still have a place to hang out, and non-smokers could go to non-smoking bars.

I think there are some cities in the USA where there are certain stipulations for a bar to allow smoking, creating the occasional oasis in a sea of non-smoking establishments.


As for spitting in public, it's not so much of an issue now that TB is not nearly so common. But I'm certain most places in Western Civ have laws against spitting in public, specifically to suppress the spread of TB. It's just not in the public consciousness so much anymore. Smoking seems to have supplanted it as the most common public health issue.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

pimpdave wrote:On that point, I do agree. Smoking should be permitted in bars. Ideally, it would split the market, so that smokers could still have a place to hang out, and non-smokers could go to non-smoking bars.


Yeah. I don't believe there were actually any rules prior to the ban here telling bars they could not prohibit smoking. I've seen plenty of non-smoking areas in places.

I guess there wasn't actually a market for it though.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Neoteny »

I'll agree with the bar thing. It's kind of expected there.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
brooksieb
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:44 pm

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by brooksieb »

Well i wouldn't tell them myself to stop smoking why? i'm not paid so why do it? if i was there and i saw some guys throw that lady off i would act immediately but not to tell someone to stop smoking i'd tell the staff, they are paid and i'm not. Even then there are two of them so if i rugby tackle one of them the other could knife me but knowing that the cowardly bastards threw the lady off into the rails so it would be likely the other one would run but even then why do that? If she was smart enough she should of told staff if it was that number of days because they obviously wern't going to budge but i am no way going to say that it was her fault because it was not but a bit of common sense could pave the way in todays world.
Last edited by brooksieb on Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4578
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by jonesthecurl »

Snorri1234 wrote:Isn't smoking pretty much prohibited indoors everywhere cept for Las vegas?

When I went to Philly, people were smoking in the bar. I found it very strange.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
tconrad
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:06 pm

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by tconrad »

Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously, why are there smoking bans on trainstations anyway? How does my smoking out in the open harm these people more than the gasfumes from all the fucking cars in the city?


Gas fumes are essentially carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide isn't good to breathe but it doesn't lead to cancer.
Make a little birdhouse in your soul.
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Dancing Mustard »

Actually they also have a high carbon monoxide content... and that's a deadly poison.


Sure, no cancer... but still equally lethal if you breathe enough.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

Dancing Mustard wrote:Actually they also have a high carbon monoxide content... and that's a deadly poison.


Sure, no cancer... but still equally lethal if you breathe enough.


Oh don't forget mono-nitrogen oxide either.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
brianrogers
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:16 am

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by brianrogers »

She was old, and would have died anyway.
Don't blame the sweet and tender hooligan.
User avatar
heavycola
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by heavycola »

brianrogers wrote:the sweet and tender hooligan.


Ah, redolent of Mozza at his finest...


Jay's right, though. Here in the good ol' U of K we are pretty bad at enforcing that 'don't push grannies onto train tracks' rule. It's a cultural oversight. Americans are way better.
Image
User avatar
kletka
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:59 am
Location: Naboo
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by kletka »

Frigidus wrote: In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.


:lol: I dont believe you. Possessing an open alhocol container in a public place is an arrestable offense in the majority of the states...

Going back to the poor lady, UK needs a firm hand of law as in the good olden days. Look what is happening in this god-forsaken country: http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?in_article_id=191707&in_page_id=2

(1) Laws of physics are not applicable in British courts
(2) Honest citizens have to pay for their own prosecution while crooks and illegal immigrants get legal aid

Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say 'ni' at will to old ladies. :cry:
Learning the force to control the dice (highest ever score: 3128, highest ever rank: 40)
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by MeDeFe »

It is the law of the land not the law of physics that matters.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by jay_a2j »

tconrad wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously, why are there smoking bans on trainstations anyway? How does my smoking out in the open harm these people more than the gasfumes from all the fucking cars in the city?


Gas fumes are essentially carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide isn't good to breathe but it doesn't lead to cancer.




You can get cancer from about 79,238,749,857 different things. If we ban them all we might be left with plain drinking water.... not the water with added Fluoride either.

We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

jay_a2j wrote:
tconrad wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously, why are there smoking bans on trainstations anyway? How does my smoking out in the open harm these people more than the gasfumes from all the fucking cars in the city?


Gas fumes are essentially carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide isn't good to breathe but it doesn't lead to cancer.




You can get cancer from about 79,238,749,857 different things. If we ban them all we might be left with plain drinking water.... not the water with added Fluoride either.

We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.



The most common cancer cause is not living inside a bubble your entire life. And even when you do live in a bubble you have to deal with heriditary forms of cancer, which are far more dickish.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by pimpdave »

jay_a2j wrote:
We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.


Watching Erin Brockovich...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

Also, there was this sticker on our rental RV when I was in the US which said "This car and it's components contain chemicals that are known to the State of California to cause cancer."


Seriously, that's just weird.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by Snorri1234 »

pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.


Watching Erin Brockovich...



Playing World of Warcraft...
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by jay_a2j »

pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.


Watching Erin Brockovich...


Good movie.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
tconrad
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:06 pm

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Post by tconrad »

jay_a2j wrote:
tconrad wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously, why are there smoking bans on trainstations anyway? How does my smoking out in the open harm these people more than the gasfumes from all the fucking cars in the city?


Gas fumes are essentially carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide isn't good to breathe but it doesn't lead to cancer.




You can get cancer from about 79,238,749,857 different things. If we ban them all we might be left with plain drinking water.... not the water with added Fluoride either.

We would have to ban:

Cell phones
Microwaves
The sun
All chemicals added to food
Nuclear technology
etc.


It's true that lots of things can cause cancer. But if someone was running around on train station dropping chemicals that cause cancer in your food, wouldn't you want him stopped?

Besides the heath risks, I think many people who have never smoked cigarettes regularly would agree that the smell is obtrusive and annoying.

Also, speaking of cancer causing things. I learned about a fungus in a class once, which is almost identical to the fungus used to make fish sauce (maybe soy sauce, don't remember). Anyway it releases toxins that cause liver cancer, and because lots of small mom and pop style fish sauce operations in China use it, their rate of liver cancer is something like 300 times higher than the rest of the world. :(
Make a little birdhouse in your soul.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”