Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
If Private Gun Ownership is such a vile throwback to a barbaric age, then Kings and hereditary aristocrats are even more so. Plus, the revenues from scuttling these pampered, prisy twits is sufficent to warrent the risk, the sale of the tracts of land alone should be worth it.MeDeFe wrote:Do you have any idea how much that would hurt tourism? People would starve, there would be riots.
Yeah, guns and monarchies are basically the same thing. I'm sure that you would no more mind being shot then I would living under a monarchy.Jenos Ridan wrote:If the UK, Japan, Sweden and all other "first world" nations that have monarcies, abolish the crown and their hereditary aristocracies (no more kings, dukes, barons, knighted people, etc.). Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged. This means, specifically for Britain; the forced abdictation of the Royals, abolishment of the House of Lords (in favor of a legislative house that fills the same role, if it is needed. If not, Britain can get along fine without it), the formal change of name from the United Kingdom to simply Great Britain and the removal of the term "royal" from such things as the British Royal Marines and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Similar actions are expected from other monarchial states. It is only under these conditions that the US will enact gun polices identical to those practiced in the nation of Switzerland.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Mustaine.HapSmo19 wrote:JR, is that Jewel or Mustaine in your avatar?
Read the bolded part, should help you figure out my intent.mandalorian2298 wrote:Yeah, guns and monarchies are basically the same thing. I'm sure that you would no more mind being shot then I would living under a monarchy.Jenos Ridan wrote:If the UK, Japan, Sweden and all other "first world" nations that have monarcies, abolish the crown and their hereditary aristocracies (no more kings, dukes, barons, knighted people, etc.). Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged. This means, specifically for Britain; the forced abdictation of the Royals, abolishment of the House of Lords (in favor of a legislative house that fills the same role, if it is needed. If not, Britain can get along fine without it), the formal change of name from the United Kingdom to simply Great Britain and the removal of the term "royal" from such things as the British Royal Marines and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Similar actions are expected from other monarchial states. It is only under these conditions that the US will enact gun polices identical to those practiced in the nation of Switzerland.![]()
Next topic: Should delusional patients be allowed net access?
I think that he is less concerned with the fact that owning guns isn't hip anymore and more with the fact that allowing every moron to own a gun for no other reason but because he really, REALLY wants to own a gun, significantly increases mortality rate. Unless you have a reason to believe that people in GB or Norway are getting killed by their form of government.Jenos Ridan wrote:Read the bolded part, should help you figure out my intent.mandalorian2298 wrote:Yeah, guns and monarchies are basically the same thing. I'm sure that you would no more mind being shot then I would living under a monarchy.Jenos Ridan wrote:If the UK, Japan, Sweden and all other "first world" nations that have monarcies, abolish the crown and their hereditary aristocracies (no more kings, dukes, barons, knighted people, etc.). Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged. This means, specifically for Britain; the forced abdictation of the Royals, abolishment of the House of Lords (in favor of a legislative house that fills the same role, if it is needed. If not, Britain can get along fine without it), the formal change of name from the United Kingdom to simply Great Britain and the removal of the term "royal" from such things as the British Royal Marines and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Similar actions are expected from other monarchial states. It is only under these conditions that the US will enact gun polices identical to those practiced in the nation of Switzerland.![]()
Next topic: Should delusional patients be allowed net access?
By way of Heavycola's reasoning, anything can be made to seem a barbarity.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
parliamentary democracy?mandalorian2298 wrote:I think that he is less concerned with the fact that owning guns isn't hip anymore and more with the fact that allowing every moron to own a gun for no other reason but because he really, REALLY wants to own a gun, significantly increases mortality rate. Unless you have a reason to believe that people in GB or Norway are getting killed by their form of government.Jenos Ridan wrote:Read the bolded part, should help you figure out my intent.mandalorian2298 wrote:Yeah, guns and monarchies are basically the same thing. I'm sure that you would no more mind being shot then I would living under a monarchy.Jenos Ridan wrote:If the UK, Japan, Sweden and all other "first world" nations that have monarcies, abolish the crown and their hereditary aristocracies (no more kings, dukes, barons, knighted people, etc.). Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged. This means, specifically for Britain; the forced abdictation of the Royals, abolishment of the House of Lords (in favor of a legislative house that fills the same role, if it is needed. If not, Britain can get along fine without it), the formal change of name from the United Kingdom to simply Great Britain and the removal of the term "royal" from such things as the British Royal Marines and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Similar actions are expected from other monarchial states. It is only under these conditions that the US will enact gun polices identical to those practiced in the nation of Switzerland.![]()
Next topic: Should delusional patients be allowed net access?
By way of Heavycola's reasoning, anything can be made to seem a barbarity.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I for one would be happy with that arrangement.Jenos Ridan wrote:If the UK, Japan, Sweden and all other "first world" nations that have monarcies, abolish the crown and their hereditary aristocracies (no more kings, dukes, barons, knighted people, etc.). Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged. This means, specifically for Britain; the forced abdictation of the Royals, abolishment of the House of Lords (in favor of a legislative house that fills the same role, if it is needed. If not, Britain can get along fine without it), the formal change of name from the United Kingdom to simply Great Britain and the removal of the term "royal" from such things as the British Royal Marines and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Similar actions are expected from other monarchial states. It is only under these conditions that the US will enact gun polices identical to those practiced in the nation of Switzerland.
I don't think the 'barbaric anachronism' thing is the main thrust of the argument that people like HC (and myself) make against private gun-ownership.A Fool wrote:Since, according to your vaulted exhortations, gun ownership is a barbaric anachronism, it is disgustingly hypocritical that you would allow the Crown to go unchalledged.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
protectedbygold wrote:I'll up the stakes - We will get rid of Miley Cyrus if Britain stops Hugh Grant from making any more movies. Everyone wins
Yo yo. What about Axel Foley? He was good. And so was all of the SNL stuff.jonesthecurl wrote:protectedbygold wrote:I'll up the stakes - We will get rid of Miley Cyrus if Britain stops Hugh Grant from making any more movies. Everyone wins
A cultural potlach!
I'll burn everything Benny Hill ever did, if you'll do the same with Eddie Murphy (except Donkey)
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:Yo yo. What about Axel Foley? He was good. And so was all of the SNL stuff.jonesthecurl wrote:protectedbygold wrote:I'll up the stakes - We will get rid of Miley Cyrus if Britain stops Hugh Grant from making any more movies. Everyone wins
A cultural potlach!
I'll burn everything Benny Hill ever did, if you'll do the same with Eddie Murphy (except Donkey)
Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
hmm that does improve it .. but even then ...MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
Or vodka.MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
Or root beer.The1exile wrote:Or vodka.MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
Frigidus wrote:Or root beer.The1exile wrote:Or vodka.MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
What?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
how have you quoted so many times?Frigidus wrote:Or root beer.The1exile wrote:Or vodka.MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote:Coca-Cola is delicious.jiminski wrote:Well i am very happy with our constitutional Monarchy... In recent times the House of Lords has proved a vital grounding influence to short-sighted carrier politicians, who either don't care about the implications of legislation upon history or can not see them!
Resting the ultimate power in the hands of the ultimately powerless is also a very elegant and accidental quirt which leads to a fine and secure balance of power.
So i'll do you another deal... you stick your coca-cola and MacDonald's up your japs-eye, so we can abolish their consumption.
And in return, you legislate against your right to keep and bear arms.
I reckon about as many lives a year will be saved..... fascist!
What?
Dunno. Must be Satan.jiminski wrote:how have you quoted so many times?Frigidus wrote:Or root beer.The1exile wrote:Or vodka.MeDeFe wrote:Only if you add whiskey.Frigidus wrote: Coca-Cola is delicious.
What?