CC has itself to blame for all the multis - if they'd bother to IP ban recidivists and known proxies we wouldn't need to 'take back the forum' with a bunch of friggin' turtle avatars.
Frop wrote:CC has itself to blame for all the multis - if they'd bother to IP ban recidivists and known proxies we wouldn't need to 'take back the forum' with a bunch of friggin' turtle avatars.
You know Frop, sometimes its just nice to have fun
Frop wrote:CC has itself to blame for all the multis - if they'd bother to IP ban recidivists and known proxies we wouldn't need to 'take back the forum' with a bunch of friggin' turtle avatars.
You know Frop, sometimes its just nice to have fun
If your definition of fun is having the same avatar on a forum you should definitely get out more.
Frop wrote:CC has itself to blame for all the multis - if they'd bother to IP ban recidivists and known proxies we wouldn't need to 'take back the forum' with a bunch of friggin' turtle avatars.
That actually begs a very good question - why doesn't CC just block the known proxy hosts ?
[mod edit] removed statement encouraging multis [/mod edit]
[sorry for veering off topic...maybe I should go to suggs/bugs with this?]
dividedbyzero wrote:[mod edit] removed statement encouraging multis [/mod edit]
[sorry for veering off topic...maybe I should go to suggs/bugs with this?]
I've exchanged a PM with Lance on this, but I take umbrage to the comment that I'm encouraging multis...far from it.
Another way to also discourage multis is to stop letting them stay after repeated incidents (see also *manimal*, theblackmages, et al). I can see giving people another chance once...maybe even twice...but the punishments seem to be so minor quite often for cheaters...especially serial cheaters.
147 *manimal 2586 1081 435 (40%) Colonel Colonel 4.1 United States United States ‹zsp› y is wicked not a mod? ‹blakebowling› because Twill is an egotistical asshole
dividedbyzero wrote:[mod edit] removed statement encouraging multis [/mod edit]
[sorry for veering off topic...maybe I should go to suggs/bugs with this?]
I've exchanged a PM with Lance on this, but I take umbrage to the comment that I'm encouraging multis...far from it.
Another way to also discourage multis is to stop letting them stay after repeated incidents (see also *manimal*, theblackmages, et al). I can see giving people another chance once...maybe even twice...but the punishments seem to be so minor quite often for cheaters...especially serial cheaters.
Wow, that's retarded. The only thing encouraging multis is the lack of proper security measures and indeed the fact that they refuse to permanently ban cheaters. You can always keep one account and buy premium as many times as you want.
Lance, I know you have way too much time on your hands, but please try to be a bit more constructive.
Frop wrote:CC has itself to blame for all the multis - if they'd bother to IP ban recidivists and known proxies we wouldn't need to 'take back the forum' with a bunch of friggin' turtle avatars.
You know Frop, sometimes its just nice to have fun
If your definition of fun is having the same avatar on a forum you should definitely get out more.
Actually, most people participating has added their own twist to the image. So its not really the same avatar. each one has their own twist to it.