Moderator: Community Team
he's weird, I already told you so.hecter wrote:Is it just me or does this make no sense?dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.
So Christians view him as a God... But he's not the Christian God... Even though the Holy Trinity is God and Jesus is part of the Holy Trinity.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Clearly...MeDeFe wrote:he's weird, I already told you so.hecter wrote:Is it just me or does this make no sense?dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.
So Christians view him as a God... But he's not the Christian God... Even though the Holy Trinity is God and Jesus is part of the Holy Trinity.
Excellent point, my friend. God had a totally hot virgin, and still couldn't get it up. Any of you young men out there ever had that problem? doubt it.Iliad wrote: and don't forget he couldn't even have sex with mary, the holy ghost had to do that
They view him as godly, not just a normal human being like you or me. But he is not THE Christian God, who is his father, and who Christians believe created the Earth. I don't see why that is so hard to follow, even if you don't believe in it yourself.hecter wrote:Is it just me or does this make no sense?dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.
So Christians view him as a God... But he's not the Christian God... Even though the Holy Trinity is God and Jesus is part of the Holy Trinity.
Okay, so God, THE Christian God is represented through the Holy Trinity, three persons, one substance, one of which is the son, Jesus, yet Jesus is not God, even though he's part of the Holy Trinity, which is God.dcowboys055 wrote:They view him as godly, not just a normal human being like you or me. But he is not THE Christian God, who is his father, and who Christians believe created the Earth. I don't see why that is so hard to follow, even if you don't believe in it yourself.hecter wrote:Is it just me or does this make no sense?dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.
So Christians view him as a God... But he's not the Christian God... Even though the Holy Trinity is God and Jesus is part of the Holy Trinity.
The Holy Trinity is a bit less straight forward, "the one God exists in three Persons and one substance, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit". He is one being, but represented by 3 beings, the holy father, the holy son, and the holy spirit, Jesus (Christ) being the holy son.
MeDeFe wrote:So you're weird and god's male. Got it.
No, because they don't have any sex. A bit like RustyMonkey.MeDeFe wrote:But can't you say that all one-celled organisms are homosexual since they all have the same sex?PLAYER57832 wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:What do you reckon? Is there any mileage in the 'God is a sausage-jockey' theory?
As supporting evidence I present the whole "So I just invented a world eh? I'll fill it with naked men, a big phallic serpent, a shortage of fig-leaves... and no chicks" job that went down in Genesis.
God = Homo. What do you reckon?No, you're both wrong!MeDeFe wrote:God is commonly referred to as "he", so it's possible for him to be homosexual.
God has to be asexual (maybe a one-celled organism ??) or he would have made two at first -- (Adam and Adam or Adam and Eve) instead of just one. (
)
dcowboys055 wrote:No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
dcowboys055 wrote:No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
do post a link to that as I can find no such painting. regardless, since you are posing this topic towards the christian god, i would speculate that he is not gay, simply stated, he detests homosexuality. my personal idea of god would not lead him to be gay either, as my got is a natural force that has no physical form, therefor no presence of mind. this is due to the lack of physical ability to think since that seems to require a cpu or brain. i think it is absurd to even pose such a question as the sexuality of the universe's creative power source but since this is not a serious debate, i suppose that true logic and reason can be suspended for the interim.mpjh wrote:You only need to look at Goya's painting of The Ecstasy of St. Teresa to realize that god has sex with those that pray hard enough, and she likes women, so definitely gay or should I say lesbian.
pimpdave wrote:Wasn't God the one who threw a rainbow up as celebration?
Sounds kinda gay.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
God promising anything - Simple Conjecture.jay_a2j wrote:pimpdave wrote:Wasn't God the one who threw a rainbow up as celebration?
Sounds kinda gay.
It is a promise to mankind that God will never again flood the Earth. Which came first the chicken or the egg? God's promise? or a bunch of people claiming the rainbow as "gay pride"?
you would have to ask the DRS for a definitive answer to that questionjay_a2j wrote:pimpdave wrote:Wasn't God the one who threw a rainbow up as celebration?
Sounds kinda gay.
It is a promise to mankind that God will never again flood the Earth. Which came first the chicken or the egg? God's promise? or a bunch of people claiming the rainbow as "gay pride"?
They exchange genetic material, though, that sounds a lot like having sex, and since they're all the same sex (if they're all sexless it's still the same) they're homosexual. So if god is homosexual he might be a one-celled organism.jonesthecurl wrote:No, because they don't have any sex. A bit like RustyMonkey.MeDeFe wrote:But can't you say that all one-celled organisms are homosexual since they all have the same sex?
Maybe Rustymonkey is God.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
God knew that homos would adopt the rainbow as a symbol in the future (he's omniscient see...) so his whole super-gay rainbow throwing 'no more floods for you' gesture was a clear indication of the fact that he loved the cawck.jay_a2j wrote:Which came first the chicken or the egg? God's promise? or a bunch of people claiming the rainbow as "gay pride"?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I think he was claiming to be God.MeDeFe wrote:Cawck mongler? Wasn't he banned for something?
Just sometimes.MeDeFe wrote:They exchange genetic material, though,jonesthecurl wrote:No, because they don't have any sex. A bit like RustyMonkey.MeDeFe wrote:But can't you say that all one-celled organisms are homosexual since they all have the same sex?
Maybe Rustymonkey is God.
That's a sculpture, and it wasn't done by Goya...mpjh wrote:You only need to look at Goya's painting of The Ecstasy of St. Teresa to realize that god has sex with those that pray hard enough, and she likes women, so definitely gay or should I say lesbian.
