Why would it be a failed thread? We're just waiting for the mods to create the clan.Snorri1234 wrote:Yay for failed threads.
Moderator: Community Team
Why would it be a failed thread? We're just waiting for the mods to create the clan.Snorri1234 wrote:Yay for failed threads.


Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
It's better to aim high and miss than to not try at all. Throwing a wet blanket on the whole thing won't help at all. As many people have stated repeatedly, if the forum really doesn't turn out, it's very simple to click "Resign Selected."Neoteny wrote:Huh. Well, kids, I suppose I'll wish you luck. My hopes for this clan are obviously low enough to give up on it.
So you say ground rules would be good, and then you say people shouldn't be restricted??Neoteny wrote:It seems to me that a clan with a few ground rules would be the perfect opportunity for pure discourse between all points of view. But any attempt to restrict that can't be expected to reach any sort of potential of worth as far as debate.


Restricted entry, of course. Moderation of discussion will, of course, be necessary, but an initial screening will serve to stifle debate.Ray Rider wrote:So you say ground rules would be good, and then you say people shouldn't be restricted??Neoteny wrote:It seems to me that a clan with a few ground rules would be the perfect opportunity for pure discourse between all points of view. But any attempt to restrict that can't be expected to reach any sort of potential of worth as far as debate.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Actually, he's an agnostic.CrazyAnglican wrote:You do realize that this thread/clan idea was started by an atheist.........right?
CrazyAnglican wrote:You seem to be talking as if this is some Christian place where we are planning to go and talk. We've got that. The point here is to talk with people interested in getting deeper into topics of discussion without dealing with trolls, who seem to think the insult is the highest form of discourse.
HapSmo19 wrote:Ixnay on the rivatepay orumfay.
Please read the forum guidelines:mpjh wrote:ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
The Guidelines wrote:The “l337” poster knows to ask himself/herself 3 basic questions before pressing the all powerful “submit” button:
One: Is my post really necessary or is it just mental diarrhea?
Two: Am I trolling or feeding a troll?
Three: Really?


Liberal meaning... restricting discussion? I must not understand you here...HapSmo19 wrote:Wow. Viewing the poll results just now, I was shocked to learn that 79% of voters are liberal.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
One: Should the OP have not asked himself these same questions?Ray Rider wrote:Please read the forum guidelines:The Guidelines wrote:The “l337” poster knows to ask himself/herself 3 basic questions before pressing the all powerful “submit” button:
One: Is my post really necessary or is it just mental diarrhea?
Two: Am I trolling or feeding a troll?
Three: Really?
Okay, and that further's your point how?Snorri1234 wrote:Actually, he's an agnostic.CrazyAnglican wrote:You do realize that this thread/clan idea was started by an atheist.........right?
seems pretty obvious what it has to do with it there. It wouldn't be our forum any more than it would belong to any other viewpoint.mpjh wrote:Where is it, can't wait to see what the "christians" do with their new clan dedicated to civil discussion. .............
[/quote]Neoteny wrote:A forum encouraging civil debate, I can support. A forum discouraging all viewpoints, I cannot.