The number of players in a game

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

How many players do you like in a game?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Puff
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.

The number of players in a game

Post by Puff »

Just a question that came to mind
Last edited by Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?! :lol:

*ahem*
That is all.
User avatar
XenHu
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Re: The number of players in a game

Post by XenHu »

Puff wrote:Just a question that came to mind


A nice small game works just fine for me :wink:
User avatar
gordon1975
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by gordon1975 »

i mostly play Terminator so more chance of getting away with not losing points if u can at least take 1 person out,so defo 6.
User avatar
Puff
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.

How many players in a game

Post by Puff »

wow I did not expect the results to be like that :shock: :shock: :shock:
Last edited by Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?! :lol:

*ahem*
That is all.
User avatar
gordon1975
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by gordon1975 »

what did u expect???
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.

Post by Ronaldinho »

5 player games are perfect, well for me at least :D:D:D
Image
User avatar
Puff
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.

Post by Puff »

gordon1975 wrote:what did u expect???


three player. Maybe 4, though I also did not think anyone would chose "I don't care"
Last edited by Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?! :lol:

*ahem*
That is all.
User avatar
Lanceyboyuk
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshunt, Herts, UK

Post by Lanceyboyuk »

out of interest i wondered why there arnt 2 player games filled by a neutral with other terrortories. probs a stupid question just curious
Image
kishih
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, The Netherlands

Post by kishih »

I don't care
Single player I really don't care, prefer doubles to be 6 player, and the option to play with 8 on world map 2.0.
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

4 or higher singles, 6 player doubles, rarely play triples (only for clan games).
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.

Post by Ronaldinho »

Only option i dont like is 3 way. Worst possible number of players although quite a few like it and thats kool. I CAN STAY CLAM lol :wink:
Image
User avatar
misscrystal
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm
Gender: Female
Location: St Louis, MO
Contact:

Post by misscrystal »

Personally, I'd like to see an option for a two player game with a neutral 3rd...

But then again, I have my own agenda....
"To get back my youth I would do anything in the world, except take exercise, get up early, or be respectable."
User avatar
Marvaddin
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Post by Marvaddin »

For standard, I prefer 5, then 6. And I hate 3 players games, too. For triples, I like 4 players :wink:
Image
Nous-irons
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by Nous-irons »

I think North America needs 7 or 8.
User avatar
Puff
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.

Post by Puff »

Nous-irons wrote:I think North America needs 7 or 8.


Seven......or EIGHT?! (and I thought six was crazy).
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?! :lol:

*ahem*
That is all.
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

Nous-irons wrote:I think North America needs 7 or 8.
What about World 2.0
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
User avatar
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:

Post by s.xkitten »

three player is the best...even on the world 2.0 map...
Selin
Posts: 1100
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:56 am
Location: Istanbul, Turkey

Post by Selin »

i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.
User avatar
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:

Post by s.xkitten »

Selin wrote:i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.


umm, that would be one team...is that the point? :?
User avatar
Lanceyboyuk
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshunt, Herts, UK

Post by Lanceyboyuk »

sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know :cry:
Image
User avatar
qeee1
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by qeee1 »

Lanceyboyuk wrote:sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know :cry:


There's the it's not fun thing...
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

The more players the better.
User avatar
P Gizzle
Posts: 4100
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere being absolutely AWESOME!

Post by P Gizzle »

s.xkitten wrote:
Selin wrote:i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.


umm, that would be one team...is that the point? :?


kitten, like the pic in ur sig. :wink:

and i like 3 players, better chance of winning..... :wink:
Gridiron Gang- CC's largest Clan!
User avatar
vgmmaster
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:07 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Post by vgmmaster »

I prefer small games myself (such as 3 or 4).

I personally don't like large single player games (5 or 6) because if the people take forever, you wait for days just to take your turn.

Never did a triples match, but I do like 6 players for team games. (Doubles = 3 teams)
User avatar
Suntzu
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:27 pm
Location: Northwest Florida Tates Hell Swamp
Contact:

Post by Suntzu »

I PLAY TERMINATOR ONLY,,,,,MORE BODIES TO STACK UP.6 IS BEST FOR ME .SUNTZU
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”