jonesthecurl wrote:btw didn't Odin also get nailed to a tree?
But did He let them do it? That was my point.
Moderator: Community Team
jonesthecurl wrote:btw didn't Odin also get nailed to a tree?
We already concluded that he wore a dress and surrounded himself with men who also wore dresses. It's like Robinson Crusoe and Friday, there's no way you can tell me there was nothing going on between them, probably between them and their goats as well...Neoteny wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Or Chuck Noland and Wilson.MeDeFe wrote:It's like Robinson Crusoe and Friday,
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
This is just yet another difference within Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church, most Protestants, etc., all believe that Jesus and the Father and the Holy Ghost ARE all God. It is often easiest for us to talk about each aspect as a separate entity. In some ways, they seem separate to we humans, but Christianity holds there IS only 1 God. It is therefore accurate to speak of Christ as a separate individual in some contexts, but he is truly also God.dcowboys055 wrote:You can try to be difficult all you want but I've pretty clearly explained it as far as explaining it goes. I'm not going to continue to repost the same thing, but one more time then I'm out.
'Okay, so God, THE Christian God is represented through the Holy Trinity, three persons, one substance' Yes
'one of which is the son, Jesus' Yes
'yet Jesus is not God' Yes, not THE god, but godly. goddddly. Not god, godddddly, get it?
'even though he's part of the Holy Trinity, which is God' Yes.
He's part of the representation of THE God, and he is, one more time, godly.
PLAYER57832 wrote:This is just yet another difference within Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church, most Protestants, etc., all believe that Jesus and the Father and the Holy Ghost ARE all God. It is often easiest for us to talk about each aspect as a separate entity. In some ways, they seem separate to we humans, but Christianity holds there IS only 1 God. It is therefore accurate to speak of Christ as a separate individual in some contexts, but he is truly also God.dcowboys055 wrote:You can try to be difficult all you want but I've pretty clearly explained it as far as explaining it goes. I'm not going to continue to repost the same thing, but one more time then I'm out.
'Okay, so God, THE Christian God is represented through the Holy Trinity, three persons, one substance' Yes
'one of which is the son, Jesus' Yes
'yet Jesus is not God' Yes, not THE god, but godly. goddddly. Not god, godddddly, get it?
'even though he's part of the Holy Trinity, which is God' Yes.
He's part of the representation of THE God, and he is, one more time, godly.
However, some churches, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses disagree. If you want to be a point of division ... well, remember who the divider is.
But that is a serious answer to a non-serious thread.
Are they homosexual, too?mpjh wrote:I get it. It is like Bush, Chaney, and Rice ARE the president.PLAYER57832 wrote:This is just yet another difference within Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church, most Protestants, etc., all believe that Jesus and the Father and the Holy Ghost ARE all God. It is often easiest for us to talk about each aspect as a separate entity. In some ways, they seem separate to we humans, but Christianity holds there IS only 1 God. It is therefore accurate to speak of Christ as a separate individual in some contexts, but he is truly also God.dcowboys055 wrote:You can try to be difficult all you want but I've pretty clearly explained it as far as explaining it goes. I'm not going to continue to repost the same thing, but one more time then I'm out.
'Okay, so God, THE Christian God is represented through the Holy Trinity, three persons, one substance' Yes
'one of which is the son, Jesus' Yes
'yet Jesus is not God' Yes, not THE god, but godly. goddddly. Not god, godddddly, get it?
'even though he's part of the Holy Trinity, which is God' Yes.
He's part of the representation of THE God, and he is, one more time, godly.
However, some churches, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses disagree. If you want to be a point of division ... well, remember who the divider is.
But that is a serious answer to a non-serious thread.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

MeDeFe wrote:Are they homosexual, too?mpjh wrote:I get it. It is like Bush, Chaney, and Rice ARE the president.PLAYER57832 wrote:This is just yet another difference within Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church, most Protestants, etc., all believe that Jesus and the Father and the Holy Ghost ARE all God. It is often easiest for us to talk about each aspect as a separate entity. In some ways, they seem separate to we humans, but Christianity holds there IS only 1 God. It is therefore accurate to speak of Christ as a separate individual in some contexts, but he is truly also God.dcowboys055 wrote:You can try to be difficult all you want but I've pretty clearly explained it as far as explaining it goes. I'm not going to continue to repost the same thing, but one more time then I'm out.
'Okay, so God, THE Christian God is represented through the Holy Trinity, three persons, one substance' Yes
'one of which is the son, Jesus' Yes
'yet Jesus is not God' Yes, not THE god, but godly. goddddly. Not god, godddddly, get it?
'even though he's part of the Holy Trinity, which is God' Yes.
He's part of the representation of THE God, and he is, one more time, godly.
However, some churches, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses disagree. If you want to be a point of division ... well, remember who the divider is.
But that is a serious answer to a non-serious thread.
Cheney's daughter IS gay ... but he is till opposed to any sort of homosexual rights. (though he does acknowledge his daughter).jonesthecurl wrote:"Daisy" Chaney...
And if there's a genetic factor to homosexuality... yes, we might be on to something here.PLAYER57832 wrote:Cheney's daughter IS gay ... but he is till opposed to any sort of homosexual rights. (though he does acknowledge his daughter).jonesthecurl wrote:"Daisy" Chaney...
But ... on another note, it sometimes seem Cheney thinks he IS God.
... and I have been on vacation and dealing with end of season gardening.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:And if there's a genetic factor to homosexuality... yes, we might be on to something here.PLAYER57832 wrote:Cheney's daughter IS gay ... but he is till opposed to any sort of homosexual rights. (though he does acknowledge his daughter).jonesthecurl wrote:"Daisy" Chaney...
But ... on another note, it sometimes seem Cheney thinks he IS God.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Well it took me a while. The painting is:mpjh wrote:You only need to look at Goya's painting of The Ecstasy of St. Teresa to realize that god has sex with those that pray hard enough, and she likes women, so definitely gay or should I say lesbian.
