and what's to prevent a group of people to kick someone out merely because that person was winning.. We have enough wimps who manipulate the game by creating alliances and crying when one gets made against them after that.. I don't trust it.
The game creator should have that option. But they should have to ask someone inportant like lackattack to see if they have a good enough reason and only moderators or whatever could actually kick someone out of a game.
i see why people may want this but in a 3 person game this would be stupid. the weaker 2 could just boot someone. this wouldn't work but perhaps the solution could b somethin like the booted player doesn't lose points? i know that this is still open to abuse but its an improvement. just wanted to get some ideas goin coz i c the need for somethin along these lines.
how about a missed turns limit setting? you could hav a set of quick game settings where its 1 strike and your out? how about a turbo game type thing?
RobinJ wrote:The game creator should have that option. But they should have to ask someone inportant like lackattack to see if they have a good enough reason and only moderators or whatever could actually kick someone out of a game.
RobinJ wrote:The game creator should have that option. But they should have to ask someone inportant like lackattack to see if they have a good enough reason and only moderators or whatever could actually kick someone out of a game.
I believe in speed games with 3+ players if a player misses a turn to deadbeating the rest of the players should have the option to vote to remove them from the game.