Talk about all things related to Conquer Club
Moderator: Community Team
Puff
Posts: 2551 Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.
Post
by Puff » Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:46 pm
Just a question that came to mind
Last edited by
Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote:
JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!
*ahem*
That is all.
XenHu
Posts: 4307 Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm
Post
by XenHu » Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:48 pm
Puff wrote: Just a question that came to mind
A nice small game works just fine for me
gordon1975
Posts: 371 Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: Scotland
Post
by gordon1975 » Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:54 pm
i mostly play Terminator so more chance of getting away with not losing points if u can at least take 1 person out,so defo 6.
Puff
Posts: 2551 Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.
Post
by Puff » Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:55 pm
Last edited by
Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote:
JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!
*ahem*
That is all.
gordon1975
Posts: 371 Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: Scotland
Post
by gordon1975 » Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:57 pm
what did u expect???
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069 Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.
Post
by Ronaldinho » Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:01 pm
5 player games are perfect, well for me at least
:D:D
Puff
Posts: 2551 Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.
Post
by Puff » Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:39 pm
gordon1975 wrote: what did u expect???
three player. Maybe 4, though I also did not think anyone would chose "I don't care"
Last edited by
Puff on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XenHu wrote:
JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!
*ahem*
That is all.
Lanceyboyuk
Posts: 259 Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshunt, Herts, UK
Post
by Lanceyboyuk » Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:30 pm
out of interest i wondered why there arnt 2 player games filled by a neutral with other terrortories. probs a stupid question just curious
kishih
Posts: 56 Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, The Netherlands
Post
by kishih » Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:59 am
I don't care
Single player I really don't care, prefer doubles to be 6 player, and the option to play with 8 on world map 2.0.
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428 Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post
by gavin_sidhu » Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:39 am
4 or higher singles, 6 player doubles, rarely play triples (only for clan games).
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069 Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.
Post
by Ronaldinho » Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:45 am
Only option i dont like is 3 way. Worst possible number of players although quite a few like it and thats kool. I CAN STAY CLAM lol
misscrystal
Posts: 142 Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm
Gender: Female
Location: St Louis, MO
Contact:
Post
by misscrystal » Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:45 am
Personally, I'd like to see an option for a two player game with a neutral 3rd...
But then again, I have my own agenda....
"To get back my youth I would do anything in the world, except take exercise, get up early, or be respectable."
Marvaddin
Posts: 2545 Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Post
by Marvaddin » Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:59 am
For standard, I prefer 5, then 6. And I hate 3 players games, too. For triples, I like 4 players
Nous-irons
Posts: 110 Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:33 pm
Post
by Nous-irons » Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:59 pm
I think North America needs 7 or 8.
Puff
Posts: 2551 Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Underground. I won't say exactly where but if you want a clue all you must do is look down.
Post
by Puff » Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:03 pm
Nous-irons wrote: I think North America needs 7 or 8.
Seven......or EIGHT?! (and I thought six was crazy).
XenHu wrote:
JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!
*ahem*
That is all.
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428 Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post
by gavin_sidhu » Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:09 am
Nous-irons wrote: I think North America needs 7 or 8.
What about World 2.0
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:
Post
by s.xkitten » Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:35 pm
three player is the best...even on the world 2.0 map...
Selin
Posts: 1100 Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:56 am
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Post
by Selin » Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:45 pm
i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.
s.xkitten
Posts: 6911 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Gender: Female
Location: I dunno
Contact:
Post
by s.xkitten » Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:25 pm
Selin wrote: i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.
umm, that would be one team...is that the point?
Lanceyboyuk
Posts: 259 Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshunt, Herts, UK
Post
by Lanceyboyuk » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:28 pm
sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know
qeee1
Posts: 2904 Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Ireland
Post
by qeee1 » Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:48 pm
Lanceyboyuk wrote: sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know
There's the it's not fun thing...
Frigidus wrote: but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
sully800
Posts: 4978 Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Post
by sully800 » Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:32 pm
The more players the better.
P Gizzle
Posts: 4100 Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere being absolutely AWESOME!
Post
by P Gizzle » Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:34 pm
s.xkitten wrote: Selin wrote: i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.
umm, that would be one team...is that the point?
kitten, like the pic in ur sig.
and i like 3 players, better chance of winning.....
Gridiron Gang- CC's largest Clan!
vgmmaster
Posts: 590 Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:07 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Post
by vgmmaster » Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:41 pm
I prefer small games myself (such as 3 or 4).
I personally don't like large single player games (5 or 6) because if the people take forever, you wait for days just to take your turn.
Never did a triples match, but I do like 6 players for team games. (Doubles = 3 teams)
Suntzu
Posts: 140 Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:27 pm
Location: Northwest Florida Tates Hell Swamp
Contact:
Post
by Suntzu » Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:52 pm
I PLAY TERMINATOR ONLY,,,,,MORE BODIES TO STACK UP.6 IS BEST FOR ME .SUNTZU