Maybe. Though the nights seem to be getting longer.Ditocoaf wrote:*looks at self*
I'm still here... are you?
Moderator: Community Team
Maybe. Though the nights seem to be getting longer.Ditocoaf wrote:*looks at self*
I'm still here... are you?
That is worrisome. I was just talking to skoffin, and HER nights seem to be getting shorter... what could this mean?muy_thaiguy wrote:Maybe. Though the nights seem to be getting longer.Ditocoaf wrote:*looks at self*
I'm still here... are you?

go back five quotes. There is nothing new.duday53 wrote:Have they done it already? Anyone know anything new?
Exactly. "micro-black holes" are created all the time. They just don't have any significant duration. Nothing will occur in the LHC that doesn't occur naturally, they're just making sure it happens in front of a microscope.william18 wrote:Even if a black hole is formed, it would deterearate from Hawking Radiation.



Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.

Well, it's not exactly the top of humor.Snorri1234 wrote:I still dont get that shit about "particles".
I'm down with silliness too!I just like it for the sillyness.

It cost something like 5 billion.oVo wrote:I read somewhere that the collider cost billions to make, while in my old neighborhood --it was rumored that-- you could get sucked into a black hole for twenty bucks. So maybe this extravagent machine was constructed in the wrong location to be cost effective.
Well, if your sense of humour falls apart ou could always put some gluon.Ditocoaf wrote:Well, it's not exactly the top of humor.Snorri1234 wrote:I still dont get that shit about "particles".
I'm down with silliness too!I just like it for the sillyness.
EDIT:
I just realized it's time for us to buckle down and return to this charming top.ic
Sorry for screwing up and causing this thread to bottom out. Isn't it strange how this always happens?
So it will probably cost upwards of $5 billion dollars. But I think it's worth it, as it is the top of human experience to discover the strange unknown. Plus, all you have to do to make anything sound downright reasonable is compare it to the cost of the Iraq War.wikipedia wrote:The total cost of the project is anticipated to be €3.2–6.4 billion.[1] The construction of LHC was approved in 1995 with a budget of 2.6 billion Swiss francs (€1.6 billion), with another 210 million francs (€140 million) towards the cost of the experiments. However, cost over-runs, estimated in a major review in 2001 at around 480 million francs (€300 million) for the accelerator, and 50 million francs (€30 million) for the experiments, along with a reduction in CERN's budget, pushed the completion date from 2005 to April 2007.[22] The superconducting magnets were responsible for 180 million francs (€120 million) of the cost increase. There were also engineering difficulties encountered while building the underground cavern for the Compact Muon Solenoid, in part due to faulty parts loaned to CERN by fellow laboratories Argonne National Laboratory and Fermilab.[23]
David King, the former Chief Scientific Officer for the United Kingdom, has criticised the LHC for taking a higher priority for funds than solving the Earth's major challenges; principally climate change, but also population growth and poverty in Africa.[24]

KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
mathematics that you don't understand, you mean. Jesus, this is like creationism's younger brother, destructionism.gdeangel wrote:They predict that those black holes will cease to exist rapidly because of mathematics that they probably don't understand

Blimey, yeah, I mean would you Adam and Eve it?heavycola wrote:mathematics that you don't understand, you mean. Jesus, this is like creationism's younger brother, destructionism.gdeangel wrote:They predict that those black holes will cease to exist rapidly because of mathematics that they probably don't understand
I hadn't seen this gdeangel quote yet, heavycola... thanks for pointing it out to me.heavycola wrote:mathematics that you don't understand, you mean. Jesus, this is like creationism's younger brother, destructionism.gdeangel wrote:They predict that those black holes will cease to exist rapidly because of mathematics that they probably don't understand

Its always great to see my handy work here on CC, In the foreground is the Hadron detector, It is made up of brass wedges with layers of scintillating tiles. Each tile has fiber optic cables coming from the inside each one. You may ask how do I know this- Let me tell you I ran the crew to build this part of the detectort-o-m wrote:
Apparently.
How fun, apparently some french scientists (lol - a french scientist) are going to split an atom.
Apparently:
This will either cause a black hole - which obviously we'll all be crushed and die.
Or, apparently:
There'll be a big nuclear explosion and we'll all get burned to death.
OR:
What'll it be children?daily mail - it MUST be true wrote:Two nightmare scenarios, two ends of the world. In the first, there is little warning. For maybe a month there would be no sign that life was about to come to an abrupt and nasty end for all living things on Earth.
Then, earthquakes would start unexpectedly, alerting geologists that something terrible, unimaginable, was amiss.
After a few days, these seismic disturbances would reach catastrophic proportions.
Cities would be levelled, the oceans would rise and wash in a series of mega-tsunamis that would attack the world's coasts, killing millions.
p.s oh and if theres already a topic about this, delete the other one because im more important
Well, it's been nice knowing you all.Timminz wrote:For any of you who are REALLY worried about this. Here is a webcam of the facility. If anything catastrophic happens, you'll know about it marginally sooner.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"