partnership points

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Bull Dog
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:41 am
Location: Sudbury

partnership points

Post by Bull Dog »

In a double or triple partnership game maybe more points should go to the partner that goes in for the kill and elimantes the opponent. This way if a player is a no show, deadbeat or just doesn't play properly he will be awarded less points
User avatar
panicker
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: NE seaside paradise UK

Re: partnership points

Post by panicker »

Bull Dog wrote:In a double or triple partnership game maybe more points should go to the partner that goes in for the kill and elimantes the opponent. This way if a player is a no show, deadbeat or just doesn't play properly he will be awarded less points


i agree with the deadbeat issue, if you win a doubles with a deadbeat you deserve at least all the points for the game

as far as getting extra points for going for the kill , absurd in my opinion, if you've got a good doubles partnership its as much good play setting your partner up for the kill as it is getting it.
Time is never wasted when your wasted all the time -
User avatar
Wisse
Posts: 4448
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: The netherlands, gelderland, epe

Re: partnership points

Post by Wisse »

Bull Dog wrote:In a double or triple partnership game maybe more points should go to the partner that goes in for the kill and elimantes the opponent. This way if a player is a no show, deadbeat or just doesn't play properly he will be awarded less points


that will abuse players,
look you are winning and your teammate has 1 country left and your opponent too, you kill first your teammate then your opponent and you got more points!
Image Image
User avatar
Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 8415
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:50 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Evil Semp »

I agree with panicker. Team games require Teamwork.
juggernaut man
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:50 am

Post by juggernaut man »

That would mess everything up. If your enemy has 2 countries left then you may not attack it if the other is surrounded by your ally then after that round the enemy could get a set and destroy everyone.

I agree with the deadbeating part.
User avatar
RobinJ
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by RobinJ »

No not clever. I regularly fortify my teammate to let them take out other players. I do agree that deadbeats should not receive points but I believe that this may be on the "To do" list. (Don't take my word for it though)
User avatar
Bull Dog
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:41 am
Location: Sudbury

Post by Bull Dog »

Okay... I just finnished a triples game.. where one of our players never showed up.. and was kicked out for missing turns...we got lucky and won.. the points however were spread out equally between all the players... now this is no fair to the other two players. Not ownly did we have to fight the other team but we had to take out the deadbeat because he was in the way. Just complete luck that we won.
The odds are against you when you have a deadbeat on your team.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=133207
User avatar
Star_BuRiT
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:10 am
Location: ???

Post by Star_BuRiT »

Bull Dog wrote: Not ownly did we have to fight the other team but we had to take out the deadbeat because he was in the way.


ok i have to give u my vote on the deadbeats cause ur posting has really made me laugh.. and i'm still laughing..lol
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”