the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

targetman377 · Post by **targetman377** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:56 pm

lol i am like that too it kinda sucks. somtimes it makes choosing a side very very very hard

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:52 pm

I'll just qualify you both as rationalists.

I am a bit of a rationalist I haven't really learned the more complex views yet but I believe that some things can be proven a priori.

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:43 pm

jonesthecurl wrote:
strike wolf wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:and if you don't join the ticket we'll set them on you...
Even I'm a bit confused about this one
Um it made sense when I posted it in response to something else, but somehow my post's arrival was delayed. Trust me, I'm sure it made sense at the time. It doesn't now, and i'm not gonna take the time to go back and find the post it was meant tot follow...

I don't trust you.

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:44 pm

targetman377 wrote:
strike wolf wrote:
targetman377 wrote:well that sounds like fun
Ever taken philosophy?
yes i did. my teacher was big on being an atheaist. he was crazy and bald. and evertime he thinked about somthing hard he put is index finger on his head and rub his bald head it drove us crazy!!!!

Sometimes I make a lady friend rub her finger on my bald head...

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:45 pm

targetman377 wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:Frankly our experience of the universe is so far from the current scientific understanding of its real nature, we have to rely on reason to get anywhere near understanding it.
On the other hand, our actual moment-to-moment reaction to what we experience is largely under our own control - which makes me lean towards phenomenological existentilism.

wow how thoughtful.

You said it bud.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:50 pm

autoload wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:
strike wolf wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:and if you don't join the ticket we'll set them on you...
Even I'm a bit confused about this one
Um it made sense when I posted it in response to something else, but somehow my post's arrival was delayed. Trust me, I'm sure it made sense at the time. It doesn't now, and i'm not gonna take the time to go back and find the post it was meant tot follow...
I don't trust you.

OK so I was bluffing. I'm not sure it did at all really. I mean what the hell was I on about? Musta been tired.

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:20 pm

OK, my respect for your honesty about the bluffing. My Eternal Worship for the fact that you admit to being tired.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:37 pm

Well, tonight's been boring and it will only be more boring with out DM and skittles.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:53 pm

Bad news indeed.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:00 am

should we have a ceremony in their honor?

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:06 am

No. Pomp is not warranted. Sleep is always warranted though. Good night.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:12 am

[tiptoes away to continue discussion elsewhere]

Perhaps we should buy CC a new gun so they can shoot themselves in the foot some more.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:14 am

Yes, does an uzi sound about right? If it was something else they might lose pace.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:15 am

or miss.

a.sub · Post by **a.sub** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:27 am

sorry im not very up to date on the banned list but who is DM?

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:31 am

a.sub wrote:sorry im not very up to date on the banned list but who is DM?

Dancing mustard. A regular here in off-topics. Very cool guy.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:32 am

jonesthecurl wrote:or miss.

I think they can manage to miss their own foot even if they had a sniper's scope pointed right at it.

targetman377 · Post by **targetman377** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:16 am

sorry here guys but i am on the admins side. sorry but they are NOT BANNED they were just kicked out they can rejoin if they want. they broke the rules very clearly so i will have to side with them. granted i like skittles very much he is always fun to chat too. i hope he comes back!!! but rules are here so everone can have a fun fair time here. sorry if this is not your view.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:28 am

I don't see it. They had some gentle fun in a private forum, to make a valid point. Ban them from that forum if you can't take people having a reasonable discussion in a forum devoted to reasonable discussion.

As I pointed out elsewhere, the question was asked "can I post while babysitting" elsewhere. No mod thought the question worth answering. Now suddenly you get thrown out for doing it in a place that well over 99% of CC members have no access to.
If it was that important they should have said so when the question was asked.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:06 pm

targetman377 wrote:sorry here guys but i am on the admins side. sorry but they are NOT BANNED they were just kicked out they can rejoin if they want. they broke the rules very clearly so i will have to side with them. granted i like skittles very much he is always fun to chat too. i hope he comes back!!! but rules are here so everone can have a fun fair time here. sorry if this is not your view.

"OFF WITH HIS HEAD!"

Seriously though the mods had a legitimate reason, moreso than I originally understood when I first saw their reason as they didn't give all the details. It just doesn't change the fact that they are gone and that to the average cc member it is still like the mods shooting themselves in the foot. Also they were busted, twill said so himself. They can come back but they would have to pay a fine in order to do so.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:39 pm

Actually I take that back. The mods are out of line. A warning yes but in my opinion this is far from warranting a ban.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:24 pm

Went to the record store today, I got:

Californication - Red Hot Chili Peppers
Evil Urges - My Morning Jacket
Urban Hymns - The Verve
Neon Bible - Arcade Fire

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:42 pm

Get on topic jnd...

targetman377 · Post by **targetman377** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:15 pm

i am wrighting a dam paper

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:34 pm

autoload wrote:Get on topic jnd...

I guess my subtle topic changes work wonders on you......

the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW