Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Do we need a rank below the cook ?

Yes
66
69%
No
26
27%
Not sure
4
4%
 
Total votes: 96

iambligh
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:15 pm

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by iambligh »

I like the idea of a waiter -- what about a rank for players who have exactly 0 points: dumbwaiter?
User avatar
Joodoo
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Joodoo »

iambligh wrote:I like the idea of a waiter -- what about a rank for players who have exactly 0 points: dumbwaiter?


That would be dish washer ;)
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
a.sub
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:07 am
Gender: Male

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by a.sub »

Joodoo wrote:
iambligh wrote:I like the idea of a waiter -- what about a rank for players who have exactly 0 points: dumbwaiter?


That would be dish washer ;)


how about dish water?
User avatar
FarangDemon
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:36 am
Contact:

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by FarangDemon »

obliterationX wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:I wonder if the lowest rank (let's say Waiter) could be prevented from playing with Field Marshalls or above...

This would cut back on farming, encourage Waiters to get promoted and make the ranks more interesting :)

Any thoughts ?

Nobody farms chefs do they? So how would that help at all.. ?


[game]3828147[/game]
[game]3828146[/game]
[game]3828145[/game]

Anyone can be farmed if their likelihood of winning times the points the farmer would lose is less than their likelihood of losing times the points the farmer would gain.

If the cooks win 100 points per game and lose 5 points per game against the conquerors team, they need to win 1 out of 21 games to break even. A team of cooks will not be able to win this often against the conqueror's team on difficult settings - that is why they are being targeted.

This is the formula farmers use to determine who to target. In the past, New Recruits were the most favorable, so all the big time farmers were going for them. Now that that is illegal / impossible, they are turning to farming cadets and cooks, which is also a profitable harvesting technique as long as they play triples, quads or difficult maps / map settings.
Jeff Hardy
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Jeff Hardy »

farang, cant you ever shut up about farming?

you do it yourself too by joining high ranked team games with low teammates to gain more points which gets you very hated among high ranks and is an asshole thing to do

when people invite you to private team games you are expected to join with a team with equal points!

remember [game]3917952[/game]? you joined our dubs with a striper to try and steal our points... good job we pwned you eh :P

back on topic, a lower rank than cook would be nice because the difference between 650 and 250 is massive but it probably wont happen
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Night Strike »

farang, please actually add something to the discussion by posting on-topic rather than post the same things all over the forum. Discussing farming has nothing to do with adding ranks.
Image
User avatar
Kotaro
Posts: 3440
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: TheJonah: You`re a fucking ruthless, little cunt!

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Kotaro »

I'm not sure if the rank itself would matter. If they added more points gained from beating higher ranks, more than the cooks get, than I'd see a point. But, if that didn't change, it'd just be a cosmetic change, and that doesn't seem overly important.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.

Image

TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
User avatar
DarthBlood
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:21 am

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by DarthBlood »

ManBungalow wrote:Hey everyone, I don't know what I'm doing but I was wondering if we could use a rank below the realms of cookliness.
Does anyone think that the gap between 1 and 800 points is insane? What would happen if we introduced a new rank? The waiter?
Having a waiter would improve the site by showing in more detail who you are playing. For example- if a high ranking officer was playing a cook with 700 points and another cook with 300 points and was losing both of them; the officer would lose twice as many points to the 300 pointer cook than he would to the 700 pointer cook, but to the officer's eyes the 2 cooks are equal. I suggest we introduce a "Waiter" rank ranging from say 1 point up to 400 points.


well, why would a high ranking person be randomly searching for cooks to play? that would be farming, and that, my friend, is a nono...(at least i THINK it's a "nono". we DO have a farmer's guild here >.>)
User avatar
reggie_mac
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Queenstown, NZ
Contact:

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by reggie_mac »

you are not allowed to farm newbies, but that doesn't mean you can't pwn n00bs... not all cooks are newbies.
Soviet Invaders: Space Invaders, it's not just a game
New Zealand Map - Foundry
"You can please all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time"
User avatar
krallam
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:55 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by krallam »

how about "latrine cleaner"? and, on a totally different topic, wtf does "pwn" mean? own? i just don't get it...
User avatar
SirSebstar
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by SirSebstar »

owned.
Pwn is a leetspeak slang term, derived from the word "own",[1][2] that implies domination or humiliation of a rival, used primarily in the Internet gaming culture to taunt an opponent who has just been soundly defeated (e.g. "You just got pwned!"). Past tense may also be spelled pwnd, pwn3d, pwnt (pronounced with a t sound), or powned (with the standard d sound). (as from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pwn)


try www.purepwnage.com for some more vids about the Internet gaming culture
bigreuben
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Rank below cook needed- Waiter

Post by bigreuben »

FabledIntegral wrote:
chipv wrote:Just one point, when you play 1200s (if at all) do you ever look to see how many games they have played?

I agree an 800 over 500 games is probably no worse than a 1200 over 500 games but every good player starts somewhere so
a 1200 over 3 games is potentially as good as a Field Marshal... you just don't know it yet.


Someone who has played 3 games has never played the types of games I play or is a multi - the word "potentially" is the only word that keeps your claim valid...



hahahaha... this is coming from "farm boy" over here, playing doodle assassin and 1on1 games...
I bet that if you play a normal 8 players, flat, sequential games you're rank would be a cook, or a waiter maybe :lol:
User avatar
a.sub
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:07 am
Gender: Male

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by a.sub »

cmon guys lets keep this out of the flame wars
User avatar
Joodoo
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Joodoo »

if you think about it, there are "cooks" in various armed forces around the world today, but there aren't any "waiters" in those armed forces, so an alternative name should be made...
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
Grizbr
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:35 am
Location: State of Confusion

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Grizbr »

How about
Outhouse Orderly" ???
User avatar
a.sub
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:07 am
Gender: Male

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by a.sub »

Grizbr wrote:How about
Outhouse Orderly" ???


or shit shoveler
User avatar
sailorseal
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by sailorseal »

Maybe to keep with the first class and all that maybe "Cook in Training"?
User avatar
Joodoo
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by Joodoo »

sailorseal wrote:Maybe to keep with the first class and all that maybe "Cook in Training"?



I'm thinking we should add a rank that's somewhere between cook and cadet (so the point requirement to become a cook would be lower):chef
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
sailorseal
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by sailorseal »

Joodoo wrote:
sailorseal wrote:Maybe to keep with the first class and all that maybe "Cook in Training"?



I'm thinking we should add a rank that's somewhere between cook and cadet (so the point requirement to become a cook would be lower):chef


I like that idea maybe a rank above cadet? Move both of them down? maybe Guard or Trainee?
insanevillian
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Rank below cook needed - Waiter - POLL !

Post by insanevillian »

after waiter and dishwasher, you can add panhandler

:-)
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”