In point of your very neat and concise to the point point, I would like to thank you for joining our discussion on whether points are pointless or pointful. Like so many misguided people already have, I'm pleased to see that you didn't miss the whole point of this thread before making a rather egregious point. Instead you were right on point with your assessment of my underlying point. Your points here on points are always welcome and I encourage you to express your point until we've all reached our boiling point on hearing anymore about points even having a point.Mr Changsha wrote:The real point of gaining points is to point out the difference in points from one point to the the next point. Some chaps might say "what's the point?" of points and it must be right to point out that if they can't see the point, they'll never see the point, of points. Others would point to the point that one's points are a validation. There can be no point to anything if points aren't counted. Or pointed. 'Point Serendipity' attempts to point the way to the point and I for one can but applaud the point the OP of 'Point Serendipity' is trying to point out, if a little pointedly, from my point of view.
Now, I wouldn't have expected the holy plagiarism of someones point to be repointed out within an actual thread about finding our focal point of how to interperate the worth of points. At least, that is of course not without being appointed to do so by the original pointer of that point. Yes I'm pointing this at you black jesus. To think that you were my hero black jesus..... I'm disappointed in your sardonic ways.-6cdowenshooter wrote:hmmm... well, in response to this pointed and right on point response, i feel that the real point of gaining points is to point out the difference in points from one point to the the next point. Some people might say "what's the point?" of points and it must be right to point out that if they can't see the point, they'll never see the point, of points. Others would point to the point that one's points are a validation. There can be no point to anything if points aren't counted. Or pointed. 'Point Serendipity' attempts to point the way to the point and I for one can but applaud the point the OP of 'Point Serendipity' is trying to point out, if a little pointedly, from my point of view. the black jesus has pointed out the true point...-0
Fruitcake wrote:Well I must disagree with your point. Surely it is pointless to try to point out the value of points to some one who percieves them as pointless. Furthmore what about those pointless points being pointed out ad infinitum. Surely those points are also pointless, for if they had a point then they would point to the real issue of points. This issue of points can be pointless if you are in one pointed camp, but if you are in the pointless camp, then this whole discussion regarding whether points have a point or are, in fact, pointless becomes pointless.
From the above point, one has to consider the point that this thread about points is pointless or has a point? I for one can see a point to points, but others who are pointless or near pointless may disagree and they do have a point!
Ah, it has always been your strong point to point out the other side of someones point. Yes, because without point A we just wouldn't now where we were headed without the knowledge that there is a point B. It's good to have you in the debate on defining the point of points and without you here, undoubtedly some would have continued to lead themselves while following the blind point. Although I suppose that is beside the point. Come in, find a seat, and please let us all learn then borrow from eachother's point of view on points. Hopefully we can continue to use this thread as our canvas to needlepoint an even stich if you will of our combined points of agreement and points of never ending pointless point making.
