Moderator: Community Team
GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote: This is grasping at straws. Are you so naive to think that politicians aren't inherently hypocritical? That people aren't inherently hypocritical? I frankly don't care how much spin you put on it; I think Obama's chosen some very capable and qualified people for Cabinet spots, and whether or not they once forgot to pay their taxes really shouldn't matter if they can get the job done.
Even if that job involves collecting taxes
Power to pardon, plenary indulgence...Napoleon Ier wrote:Don't be silly... I'm sure they all confessed to to the Holy Father Obama and he absolved them, so that's all OK then, eh?
InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote: This is grasping at straws. Are you so naive to think that politicians aren't inherently hypocritical? That people aren't inherently hypocritical? I frankly don't care how much spin you put on it; I think Obama's chosen some very capable and qualified people for Cabinet spots, and whether or not they once forgot to pay their taxes really shouldn't matter if they can get the job done.
Even if that job involves collecting taxes
That sounds nice and everything... but actually, yes.
GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote: This is grasping at straws. Are you so naive to think that politicians aren't inherently hypocritical? That people aren't inherently hypocritical? I frankly don't care how much spin you put on it; I think Obama's chosen some very capable and qualified people for Cabinet spots, and whether or not they once forgot to pay their taxes really shouldn't matter if they can get the job done.
Even if that job involves collecting taxes
That sounds nice and everything... but actually, yes.
Well I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion...
So then, if it's ok for officials to be hypocrites and not follow their own standards, what is it that could possibly disqualify a person from performing in any public office? Other than Obama not liking them that is...
If Obama nominates people despite such shortcomings would they then be qualified?InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote: This is grasping at straws. Are you so naive to think that politicians aren't inherently hypocritical? That people aren't inherently hypocritical? I frankly don't care how much spin you put on it; I think Obama's chosen some very capable and qualified people for Cabinet spots, and whether or not they once forgot to pay their taxes really shouldn't matter if they can get the job done.
Even if that job involves collecting taxes
That sounds nice and everything... but actually, yes.
Well I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion...
So then, if it's ok for officials to be hypocrites and not follow their own standards, what is it that could possibly disqualify a person from performing in any public office? Other than Obama not liking them that is...
If they do their job well, they can be as hypocritical as they like and I wouldn't give a f*ck.
Something that could disqualify a person would be, for example, being unintelligent, or belligerent, or lazy, or receiving money from a corporation, or being the ex-CEO of an international corporation, just to name a few things
InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote:GabonX wrote:InkL0sed wrote: This is grasping at straws. Are you so naive to think that politicians aren't inherently hypocritical? That people aren't inherently hypocritical? I frankly don't care how much spin you put on it; I think Obama's chosen some very capable and qualified people for Cabinet spots, and whether or not they once forgot to pay their taxes really shouldn't matter if they can get the job done.
Even if that job involves collecting taxes
That sounds nice and everything... but actually, yes.
Well I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion...
So then, if it's ok for officials to be hypocrites and not follow their own standards, what is it that could possibly disqualify a person from performing in any public office? Other than Obama not liking them that is...
If they do their job well, they can be as hypocritical as they like and I wouldn't give a f*ck.
Something that could disqualify a person would be, for example, being unintelligent, or belligerent, or lazy, or receiving money from a corporation, or being the ex-CEO of an international corporation, just to name a few things


jbrettlip wrote:Except Obama, since he never worked a day of his life in the private sector.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
kentington wrote:I really don't like Obama. Really, really. I don't agree with his policies and I wouldn't mind almost anything to get him legally out of office.
On this topic, however, I don't feel we have enough information to blame him. If he knew, then it shows his lack of judgement. If he didn't know, then he was probably lied to and the tax thing may not have come up. If it did come up and he was directly lied to,then he's not a good judge of character, but I already knew that cause he hangs out with Pelosi, Biden and Acorn. From what we know, it was the fault of the people who didn't pay their taxes.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jbrettlip wrote:This is BY far the most corrupt cabinet ever assembled.
herschal wrote:jbrettlip wrote:This is BY far the most corrupt cabinet ever assembled.
[Cough] President Grant [Cough]
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
pimpdave wrote:kentington wrote:I really don't like Obama. Really, really. I don't agree with his policies and I wouldn't mind almost anything to get him legally out of office.
On this topic, however, I don't feel we have enough information to blame him. If he knew, then it shows his lack of judgement. If he didn't know, then he was probably lied to and the tax thing may not have come up. If it did come up and he was directly lied to,then he's not a good judge of character, but I already knew that cause he hangs out with Pelosi, Biden and Acorn. From what we know, it was the fault of the people who didn't pay their taxes.
So he's guilty by association just because you don't like him?
You admitted you'd pin anything on him you possibly could, and I must say, the bad judge of character thing... Can you always tell all the time when you yourself are lied to? If you say yes, you're lying to me.
Plus, remember, these guys he's trying to put to work are career politicians. What are career politicians stereotypically known for being great at?
kentington wrote:Of course I would say he's a bad judge of character, I don't like him and I think he would hang around people like himself.
spurgistan wrote: hell, look at Bush II's Department of the Interior, if you want a laughably mega-corrupt operation. We'll never know how much got stolen out of their, becuase let's face it, when you're having a coke party with people you're regulating, who's gonna write stuff down?

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
No.pimpdave wrote:Dude, this is the same cycle for each party, every time.
The best thing for a political party is to not be in power. Because then they can blame everything on the other side.
Look, we need to stop looking at things through strict party lines. We need to look at the individuals.
SRSLY
