The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by AAFitz »

***Not all of this will make sense, since it responds to a different thread, but most can deduce what I was responding to easy enough from the context.

There is no way to make the guns dissappear. There is no easy way to get rid of illicit drugs, harmful viruses, or harmful bacteria either. And yet we make the effort, because in the end, it will save lives.

As far as the government controlling us, well, they already do. If you think youre gonna hold off the military with a 30/30 or an uzi, you are sadly mistaken. What protects us from the military, is unfortunately the military. It is the men and women in the armed services, that we must trust. We must simply trust, that there are enough good people to counter any evil intent by any that would use the government against us. I dont know if you watched CNN at all, be the US military took down a trained million man army, complete with tanks, jets, chemical weapons very quickly. Now you may argue that they did not conquer it completely, but that is only because they show restraint. They could kill every last person in any small country, and could very quickly kill every last one of us, if they decided to do so. It isnt our bb guns that is keeping them at bay, it is their sanity. Never mistake the actual force of the military. They never have a green light for absolute destruction. If every person in the military and government decided to declare war on the people, and be willing to fight to the death its game over. Never in any modern war, has the military been allowed to use its full power. Iraq would be a cinder, devoid of all life, and colonized right now if they were. We could have annihilated the entire population right down to the last person. It is not the iraqi weapons that are holding us at bay. It is us that is holding us at bay, and thankfully so.

It wouldnt be the first time that such checks and balances did not work, but if they fail, and you arm every us citizen with a gun, we still cannot hold back the military. The only way to protect us, is to hire the right people for the job. Holding them back with force, is not an option.

As far as your examples of China and Korea, they also punish other crimes severely, but that does not mean that is why the government has power. Military technology has surpassed the ability of any people to control its military. Its ludicrous to think otherwise. And as corrupt as government may be, because the corruption always stands out more than the good....there are plenty of people in our military and government, who would gladly lay down their lives to protect our country, even if its from our own military itself. if this is not the case, we are doomed anyways. I dont care how many citizens have guns.

As far as supporting the fact that it is easy to get guns as a criminal is easy. Anyone who has not been convicted, can purchase a weapon. So any criminal that doesnt have a criminal record, or any person who wants to commit a crime, can go buy the weapon. It might take a few days, but now any psycho that has no record, can go buy a weapon, and shoot at a crowd of people and there is absolutely nothing that can stop him. And as far as buying a gun off the black market? Where do you think those guns come from? Why do you think they are so cheap? Its because there is a mass market for weapons, and producing a few extra, or stealing a few of those is easy. If all guns were illegal, the price of guns would sky rocket. The penalty for having one would be severe. Guns allow a level of violence that simply would not be sustainable by any other means.

Your main arguement really is that we need to have guns, because we have guns. It would be too much work to get rid of the guns, and that the lives lost are not worth working towards that goal.

As far as china and korea, guns are also illegal in Japan. In Japan, they have not had any kind of guns, or even swords for many years. Their government has no more control of it because of that. And since there is virtually no gun crime to speak of, it is safe to say the japanese are better off for it.

To argue, that japan should allow its citizens to go purchase weapons, just in case someone smuggles in a gun, and then they need to protect themselves, is just ludicrous, because it would just make guns available and increase gun crime exponentially. To argue we need them in the US, to protect against other weapons, is the same. The only question, would be the process of the elimination. But if guns were made illegal tomorrow, many lives would be saved. Not all, but many innocent women, children, and men would be saved. There would be some that arguably would have been killed because they only brought a knife to a gun fight, but that number would be the tiniest percentage of the number saved. And over time, the volume of lives saved would be incalculable.

There can be no question that removing guns would save lives. There is no question it would reduce crime in general. Many crimes simply wouldn't be possible without the use of Guns. There would be no more risk of becoming a police state, than there is now.

The main reason guns have not been made illegal, is not because of the obvious benefits to its citizens. Its because of the selfishness of its citizens. The manufacture of weapons is big business. It would cost jobs, and billions of dollars to get rid of them. Our society had decided for now, that this cost is too high, to protect the thousands of innocent people that are harmed and killed by guns every day, let alone every year. We may never decide it is worth the cost. But that will never make the decision the correct one.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
User avatar
GabonX
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:38 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by GabonX »

Thanks for your opinion. When you can shorten it to less than a book's length and have something to back it up with let us know. There is an abundance of available data which attests to the innacuracy of your views. Unless you can demonstrate the legitimacy of your claims they will be regarded as illegitimate.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Is it really so important to be right about these things? In the US, we are well aware that well-meaning gun bans do not work. And if we respected English Law we never would have fought the Revolutionary war. Not that there's anything wrong with the English, we're just different people is all.

But this isn't really about that; this is about Obama's administration destroying the 2nd Amendment. If the Dems pass these bills, and Obama enforces it... will the public resist? Large portions of it will... but will enough people say "you can't have my gun?" What if the new Brown Shirts enforce this? Do people even care about the Constitution anymore? FI doesn't even know it, or respect it. And I think that has become the norm in this country.
User avatar
comic boy
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by comic boy »

GabonX wrote:Thanks for your opinion. When you can shorten it to less than a book's length and have something to back it up with let us know. There is an abundance of available data which attests to the innacuracy of your views. Unless you can demonstrate the legitimacy of your claims they will be regarded as illegitimate.


A well considered post is illegitimate because it is not supported by a cherry picked link :lol:
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
The1exile
Posts: 7140
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:01 pm
Location: Devastation
Contact:

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by The1exile »

GabonX wrote:
The1exile wrote:
Voltaire wrote:A witty saying proves nothing.

Agreed.

Why would you start off by quoting one?

There is nothing witty in hat saying beyond the fact that Voltaire said it. Nice try, though. What it does prove is that using lolgun images to try and win over people proves nothing.

GabonX wrote:How so? Murder, rape, and assault are all violent crimes. An act of violence is universally understood. If their is a school of thought which holds that the definition of violent crime varies between the US and the UK it is up to you to provide evidence of this.


Prove it? Obvious skew is obvious - esp. when your own sources says of violent crime in the UK Much of violent crime is low level violence (such as pushing and shoving) and around half of violent crime does not involve any injury to the victim.". People here are not mugged because they don't have a gun/knife/whatever, they're mugged, and duly killed if they do have a weapon, if they're not arrested first. You can find that in all news sources you care to look in, even if they are tabloids. If you can find me something from the CIA factbook or similar saying that your violent crime is more than, as you say, rape, assault and murder, then I will be happy to reconsider my stance on this.

GabonX wrote:Second they also cite organizations like the British Home Office and the British Crime Survey for 2005/2006 (the specifics here) and the CIA Factbook as well. Those are the third, fourth and fifth links of my first source.

Third the Spectator and the Sun are not entirely unreliable sources. Below is a link where the Telegraph covers the "600 kids mugged a day"story as well. There is another source beneath that one. I can get more.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... a-day.html
http://www.escatory.org/news/8/


As I said above, your own sources are being read to your own viewpoint to ignore the flaws in your conclusions from them. And the telegraph is not much better than the others - if you want a properly unbiased news source, try The Times, or the BBC (I will deal with your link below).

GabonX wrote:
The1exile wrote:Also, the generally accepted reason for gun crime going up so dramatically is because of a change in recording measures that classed more crimes in these categories, implemented in 2002 - this is why you will see a spike on nearly all graphs over 2002/2003, after which the figures tend to decrease smoothly once more as all reports conform to the same system once more.


Once again, if this is true it falls on you to show evidence of this.


Evidence of what, exactly? That they're continuing to decrease after the change? That the spike coincides with the change in reporting procedure? That's already on the tables. That there really was a change? I can find you a news ink if you like, but that's hardly the most unverifiable of claims, and if it was false I'd expect you to call me out on it.

GabonX wrote:Yes, we do have a higher murder rate in the United States but we have a lower over all violent crime rate (this includes things like rape, assault, burglary etc.). The higher murder rate is the result of gangs who have more control than police in violent urban areas. The recent Supreme Court Case dealt with someone who lived in one of these places and was denied his right to own a hand gun by the city. Luckily the Supreme Court reaffirmed his right to keep arms as it would make no sense to not allow the one person who applied to own one legally.


Your murder rate is more than 4 times that of England and Wales, not including firearm accidents. As for the "gang culture", don't you think that's actually advocating not allowing people with criminal records to buy them openly and not get tracked at all?

GabonX wrote:Anti gun advocates leave out critical details which include the fact that there is a boom in violent crime (including murder) in every instance where gun bans are put into effect and violent crime has decreased (once again including murder) in every state that has adopted right to carry laws.
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/crime/pdcrm/pdcrm20.html

BBC states that the murder rate in the UK is at a ten year high

Your first link is broken. Your second is, frankly, laughable. It's saying that the murder rate (in Scotland - with it's own culture that is entirely different to the UK as a whole) has increased to 137. For a country with a population of over 5 million. That means the rate of homicide per 100,000 is about 0.7 - it's not really comparable, is it? And if you were trying to use "we must stamp out the gun culture" argument - most of those deaths were knife related (and yes, we do have a knife crime problem, probably mostly because of availability...), with no stats at all on how many were gun related. Just a Lib Dem bleating an opinion that no-one will care about to sound good to the papers.
Image
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by AAFitz »

GabonX wrote:Thanks for your opinion. When you can shorten it to less than a book's length and have something to back it up with let us know. There is an abundance of available data which attests to the innacuracy of your views. Unless you can demonstrate the legitimacy of your claims they will be regarded as illegitimate.


Thank you for your short post. It was very well thought out. It is of course completely exxaggerated and illegitimate since my post might be a full two pages, which would make it no more than a leaflet, let alone a book. But then, that does seem to be how you view your supposed legitimate statistics, so that is not surprising. Further, it is my opinion, so you can regard it as whatever you like. Im not trying to prove anything to anyone, but simply post my opinion.

Thanks for your well thought out post which clearly shows that you are very interested in discussing this matter....as long as you dont have to read too much.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by PLAYER57832 »

A smattering of recent headlines (some paraphrased):

Pregnant woman, sitting in her kitchen is shot (survives) by stray bullet from hunter. No charges, no penalty. Legal.

Woman getting into her car is shot in head, dies. Charges filed on land owner and hunter.

Boy, age 8 shoots himself at gun show while father watches.

College student, with mental issues take gun and kills 30.

Boy, age 14, shoots classmates.

Six year old takes gun to school for "show and tell". No one was hurt, family investigated.

Most dangerous law enforcement position? Game Warden/wildlife enforcement officer (or similarly titled positions)

Man barricades himself, claims end of world and kills entire family
.


Will better gun laws prevent all of these? No. But, some additional controls are needed because NOT EVERYONE USES GUNS RESPONSIBLY. Sad, but true. Most of those changes in legislation, particularly the limits on those with psychiatric conditions, are in direct response to crimes and issues.

We are a gun-toting family. I myself don't hunt, but EVERYONE over 5 in our extended family knows how to use one and most do hunt (or hunted before they got too disabled or busy with school, etc.). Same for probably 90% of households here. If this area ever were invaded .... they would be met with some resistance, no doubt, but it would no doubt involve more than mere guns (I remain intentionally and blissfully ignorant of such means, but I do know they exist)! In the meantime, our guns are locked and inaccessible. We also have back doors and phones. They tend to do a lot more against criminals. (especially since most are on drugs/looking for drugs)
User avatar
dewey316
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:30 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The Illegalization of guns in America--tracking the new bill

Post by dewey316 »

PLAYER57832 wrote:A smattering of recent headlines (some paraphrased):


I could play the same game, and post a dozen headlines of 80 year old women, who used a gun to protect themself from being raped during a home invasion. Those headlines prove nothing, other than the fact, that yes, sometimes bad people, do bad things.

PLAYER57832 wrote:Will better gun laws prevent all of these? No. But, some additional controls are needed because NOT EVERYONE USES GUNS RESPONSIBLY. Sad, but true. Most of those changes in legislation, particularly the limits on those with psychiatric conditions, are in direct response to crimes and issues.


They are not needed. They do nothing for the real issue.

1) The guns on the list to ban, are not the guns used in crimes. Period, end of story. I posted in the last gun rights thread, a list of FBI statistics on guns used in crimes. The things that people are trying to ban are the guns that are being used to commit crimes. No ciminal is going to spend $2500 for a very nice semi-automatic rifle. They instead spend $100, on a cheap, 22 revolver. The stats from the FBI back that up.

2) The gun laws do no do anything to prevent the ciminals from commiting crimes. Just look at your list, how could the laws in question have prevented any of these? The children who brought guns, and shot people, were already breaking EXCISTING gun laws. The hunters were hunting (which is still legal...they should be prosecuted, and held responsible for their actions, but that is a different discussion).

PLAYER57832 wrote:We are a gun-toting family. I myself don't hunt, but EVERYONE over 5 in our extended family knows how to use one and most do hunt (or hunted before they got too disabled or busy with school, etc.).


And how many people in your extended family, have commited a crime with a gun. I would guess zero. Guess what, responsible people are responsible with or without a gun. All these laws do, is keep those already honest people, well honest, and unarmed.

Don't lose track of the real issues, and the real goal. We all want to save lives, even those of use who support 2nd ammendment rights. BUT, what we don't need to do, is have these crazy laws that are ingnorance based, knee-jerk reaction, that are nothing more than fear of "evil black rifles". They don't address the problem at all. Why don't we spend our effort on something usefull, and put this money and time into getting criminals off the street, and enforcing the already excisting laws to prevent people from illegaly accessing the firearms they use to commit crimes with.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”