***Finn Rock Fallout*** -- Game Over ~ Infected Win

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:10 pm

supercram wrote:
wicked wrote:cram the odds only go up BECAUSE THERE ARE LESS TOWNIES!! Sacrificing townies to get better odds is ASSININE.

but it looks like this vote is over anyway. IC, you better be innocent or I'm dead too.

wicked that's a tautology. the odds go up because there are less people altogether. WHICH MAKES THE GAME EASIER.

jesus, you are thickheaded. or you have never studied probablility. or.........

you are mafia

So you are saying we should vote for anybody because that means there will be less people and therefore better odds of catching a multi?!?

You really are looking out for the townies.... :roll:

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:10 pm

Vote Count

(7) AK_iceman -- (Mach, Autoload, Master Bush, Supercram, Dussle, Trestain, Bogusbet)
(1) Supercram -- (Broomhead)
(1) Reverend_kyle -- (Freetymes)
(1) Autoload -- (Moz)
(4) No Lynch -- (Backglass, Wicked, Xenhu, AK_iceman)
Not Voting, Everyone Else

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

--Andy

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:11 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
supercram wrote:
wicked wrote:cram the odds only go up BECAUSE THERE ARE LESS TOWNIES!! Sacrificing townies to get better odds is ASSININE.

but it looks like this vote is over anyway. IC, you better be innocent or I'm dead too.

wicked that's a tautology. the odds go up because there are less people altogether. WHICH MAKES THE GAME EASIER.

jesus, you are thickheaded. or you have never studied probablility. or.........

you are mafia

So you are saying we should vote for anybody because that means there will be less people and therefore better odds of catching a multi?!?

You really are looking out for the townies....

Sorry, when i said "multi" I meant mafia. :oops:

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:11 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
supercram wrote:
wicked wrote:cram the odds only go up BECAUSE THERE ARE LESS TOWNIES!! Sacrificing townies to get better odds is ASSININE.

but it looks like this vote is over anyway. IC, you better be innocent or I'm dead too.

wicked that's a tautology. the odds go up because there are less people altogether. WHICH MAKES THE GAME EASIER.

jesus, you are thickheaded. or you have never studied probablility. or.........

you are mafia

So you are saying we should vote for anybody because that means there will be less people and therefore better odds of catching a multi?!?

You really are looking out for the townies....

YES.

but in this case we don't have to just vote for anybody.

we have you, my friend.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:11 pm

cram, I know that's why the odds go up you moron, as I already said. :roll:

but we can find out the same info by not lynching dumbass.

you fuckin noob, why would I be pushing no lynch if I was mafia? :roll:

wait, one more eye rool for good measure! :roll:

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:12 pm

and if we are wrong, we know where to turn

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:12 pm

supercram wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
supercram wrote:
wicked wrote:cram the odds only go up BECAUSE THERE ARE LESS TOWNIES!! Sacrificing townies to get better odds is ASSININE.

but it looks like this vote is over anyway. IC, you better be innocent or I'm dead too.

wicked that's a tautology. the odds go up because there are less people altogether. WHICH MAKES THE GAME EASIER.

jesus, you are thickheaded. or you have never studied probablility. or.........

you are mafia

So you are saying we should vote for anybody because that means there will be less people and therefore better odds of catching a multi?!?

You really are looking out for the townies....

YES.

but in this case we don't have to just vote for anybody.

we have you, my friend.

You will likely be next for that way of thinking.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:13 pm

wicked wrote:you fuckin noob, why would I be pushing no lynch if I was mafia?

Reverse psychology.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:13 pm

If AK turns out to make be mafia, then we turn out attention towards Autoload.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:14 pm

wicked wrote:cram, I know that's why the odds go up you moron, as I already said. but we can find out the same info by not lynching dumbass.

you fuckin noob, why would I be pushing no lynch if I was mafia?

wait, one more eye rool for good measure!

okay you wanna say f*ck? let's say f*ck.

you're fucking stupid if you think we can find out the same info by not lynching. and i think you're voting no lynch to save AK who is your mafia buddy. i did not want to name call, but you started thi

no need for name calling.

FOS wicked

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:14 pm

dussle, shut up, you're just stupid...lol.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:14 pm

Freetymes, I see you lurking, lets hear your opinion.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:15 pm

How about this, why not wait until Rev logs on and posts?
Him being the other mason, he might have something to say that could clear my name.

I understand that the mafia would want to push for my death, especially before Rev gets a chance to say anything. But I hope the other, more clear-headed townies will realize that would be a smart move.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:15 pm

wicked wrote:dussle, shut up, you're just stupid...lol.

How could I resist saying that? I've been toying with the idea since I first postd today.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:17 pm

Master Bush wrote:Freetymes, I see you lurking, lets hear your opinion.

He's probly catching up on the 12 pages we wrote in the last couple hours. :lol:

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:17 pm

AK_iceman wrote:How about this, why not wait until Rev logs on and posts?
Him being the other mason, he might have something to say that could clear my name.

I understand that the mafia would want to push for my death, especially before Rev gets a chance to say anything. But I hope the other, more clear-headed townies will realize that would be a smart move.

good point. i'll wait for this. i'm a reasonable man.

UNVOTE AK_iceman

to give him a chance to have his name cleared and put the brakes on mob mentality

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:17 pm

AK_iceman wrote:How about this, why not wait until Rev logs on and posts?
Him being the other mason, he might have something to say that could clear my name.

I understand that the mafia would want to push for my death, especially before Rev gets a chance to say anything. But I hope the other, more clear-headed townies will realize that would be a smart move.

A smarter move is not to give the two of you the benefit of the doubt and not take your word or Reverend's for anything.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:18 pm

Vote Count

(6) AK_iceman -- (Mach, Autoload, M. Bush, Dussle, Trestain, Bogusbet)
(1) Supercram -- (Broomhead)
(1) Reverend_kyle -- (Freetymes)
(1) Autoload -- (Moz)
(4) No Lynch -- (Backglass, Wicked, Xenhu, AK_iceman)
Not Voting, Everyone Else

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

--Andy

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:19 pm

The faster we lynch one when know more about the other, and for that matter anyone who seems to be connected to the other.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:20 pm

Master Bush wrote:The faster we lynch one when know more about the other, and for that matter anyone who seems to be connected to the other.

Huh?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:21 pm

what do we learn by lynching IC?

1. IC mafia, Auto either good cop or random cop, RK either mafia or not (IC could be lying about masons, being married means nothing)

2. IC not mafia, Auto either mafia or insane cop, RK not mafia

Either way, we learn nothing about whether to trust Auto or not. The only thing we gain is whether to trust RK, but what does that gain us really? He could get infected later and his only special power was taken away.

what do we learn by not lynching IC?

1. Whether Auto's reads can be trusted or not, which will help us out much more in the future.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:22 pm

Look at the lynching step, the same thing can be accomplished by a lynch or not so long as it isn't Auto.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:23 pm

wicked wrote:
what do we learn by not lynching IC?

1. Whether Auto's reads can be trusted or not, which will help us out much more in the future.

how do we learn this if we do not lynch IC exactly? how do we know if his read on IC was correct?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:23 pm

smart move cram, I take back the bad things I said about you. what's the harm in taking it a little slower so everyone has a chance to weigh in. It's only friday, we have until sunday.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:24 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
Master Bush wrote:The faster we lynch one when know more about the other, and for that matter anyone who seems to be connected to the other.

Huh?

The sooner we lynch you, the sooner we know if we can trust autoload or not. If you are mafia, then it's safe to say that Rev and Wicked are also mafia. If you are not Mafia, then it's safe to say that Autoload is, as well as Dussle.