Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
luns101 wrote:It would be really cool if you could somehow merge your Walter Payton sig and make it look like he was running with the bulls through Pamplona, Frigidus
john9blue wrote:Oh hey, a (Christian/atheist) newcomer to the Off-Topic Forum. Looks like he's trying to (convert/insult) us. He's way too (gullible/closed-minded), if you ask me. He probably thinks he has something to say that will (save our souls/make us feel stupid). I'm sure he'll realize soon enough that we aren't all (assholes/idiots).
P.S. I've heard that story before. It works if you believe God to be the source of all good, but otherwise the professor & kid both don't know what they're talking about.
AAFitz wrote:The bible suggests we cannot worship any other gods beside him. This is not possible. No good god would be capable of caring whether you worshiped another god. It would be pure ego.
AAFitz wrote:The bible suggests one must accept God to get into heaven. Many do, and they will be saved. However, many people do not believe in god, simply because of where they were born. You may argue that it is their fault, but logically, there is no way for a child, who was taught since birth, that there is a different god, and that they should worship him. Therefore, it is simply not fair for this person to be rejected from heaven, simply because he never once had any real chance of believeing in God. He was told his god was the real one, and therefore worshiped him religiously. There is no possible way for him to know he is wrong. So, if God allows the person that happened to believe in him, and rejects the other, than he has set up a system that is unfair on a basic level. It could even be seen as evil. We as humans recognize that such systems are wrong, and have laws against such discrimination.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:It does seem really unfair that God would do that, doesn't it? But some would argue that God has an incomprehensible reason for putting those people in the situation they are in... a reason us humans wouldn't be aware of. Others might say that the search for God itself is what gets you into heaven, no matter what God it might be.
The Neon Peon wrote:(if he can't find reasonable answer)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:(if he can't find reasonable answer)
This is the reason anti-Creationists can never be swayed. They're so convinced that God is an excuse, and not an explanation.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not at all true.
MOST of the people who accept Evolution (I don't say believe, because it is a matter of proof, not faith), ALSO believe in God. In fact, the largest percentage are Christians, Jews and Moslems who, despite our differances all read the same Genesis.
To believe (and it IS a matter of belief, not proof), you have to believe that the overwhelming majority of scientists and most church officials from the past 100 years are all in one giant conspiracy.
and THAT is why it upsets so many people.
Ideas, plausible theories are ALWAYS welcome in science, but to deny truth is neither Christian nor science.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:(if he can't find reasonable answer)
This is the reason anti-Creationists can never be swayed. They're so convinced that God is an excuse, and not an explanation.
The Neon Peon wrote:Alright, then it comes down to the following:
Our explanation vs Your Explanation
We just don't know that yet vs. This is the act of God
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:Alright, then it comes down to the following:
Our explanation vs Your Explanation
We just don't know that yet vs. This is the act of God
I talked about this somewhere else, I think: the phrase "We just don't know that yet" requires faith. There must be an answer, so you are believing that either humans will someday find an answer that doesn't involve God, or will not find an answer and keep on believing that God didn't do it.
Sorry for being douchey earlier, but you shouldn't think of Creationists and Evolutionists/scientists/thinkers as mutually exclusive.
The Neon Peon wrote:
We just don't know that yet vs. This is the act of God

Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:
So the question is not whether or not god is real or if he created us but if we should kill, maim, destroy, and hate another man because of what he thinks or believes in.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.