Moderator: Community Team
Hes right of course. We all saw god part the sea. Steal Adams rib, and plant all the plants before creating the Sun. This has been proven and is in no way laughable. The idea of small changes taking place over millions of years, which we actually can see the results of, and see plenty of evidence of...yeah...thats whats laughable.jay_a2j wrote:First off we might not want to throw around words or at least define them better before using them. Christian. What is it? We can differ on what the meaning is but lets look at it.
My belief is that going to church does not make you a Christian. Nor does being a member of a "church". I firmly believe that a Christian, believes that Jesus is the Son of God (in fact is God) and believes that the Bible is the absolute Word of God, infallible. If this is true, which I believe it is, then there is a big problem with Evolutionist Christians. The Bible does not back it. It in fact contradicts it. Now I know that there are Christians that succumb to the belief in evolution, it doesn't make them non-christian it just makes them wrong. Save the "proof" of evolution for someone else, it does not exist. It can not be observed or replicated which is required for it to be a LAW. Hence it is merely just a theory.... which by the way, is laughable at best.
Carry on....
Good to see our moderators have their finger on the pulse..Night Strike wrote:Very nice post.
I am guilty as wellFrigidus wrote: I'm almost ashamed really. I am aware that I'm posting in a troll thread...but I just love this stuff. I can't help it.
It was actually pretty arrogant, and in the full version it was arrogant and supported the other side.icedagger wrote:Good to see our moderators have their finger on the pulse..Night Strike wrote:Very nice post.
Well played Rusty sir
Actually, I'm pretty sure that the atheist part was added later.Frigidus wrote:I've got to say, I'm actually very disappointed that that was written by an athiest...I hate these arguments between two guys some person made up. It's completely insulting to someone's intelligence to suggest that in the span of five minutes someone can talk you out of a long held faith (or lack thereof). Who writes these "dumbshit argues with 'expert' and promptly converts" things?
I don't know why she swallowed the fly.AAFitz wrote:
Hes right of course. We all saw god part the sea. Steal Adams rib, and plant all the plants before creating the Sun. This has been proven and is in no way laughable. The idea of small changes taking place over millions of years, which we actually can see the results of, and see plenty of evidence of...yeah...thats whats laughable.
Luckilly, the christians that taught and raised me weren't the close minded, type, and focused on the teachings of Christ, and not the contradictory, highly suspicious, and scientifically impossible few passages in the bible.
It is amazing that you cant believe that a slow process could take place, but that plants could survive on earth for 24 hours, or even better that the earth wouldnt crumble after a star with immense gravity was "created next to it"...this is not laughable....
Further, the idea that there was no death until adam and eve sinned is not laughable. There were dinosaurs, plants, and bacteria, viruses, and fish all living in perfect harmony. They needed no food because they could not eat, for the bible says there was no death, so it must be true. I wonder if all the animals were sitting around getting ready to pounce for their first meal ever, as they saw adam take his first bite. An ant about to take a bite of a leaf, a spider ready to eat the and, a rabbit about to eat the leaf and both the spider and the and, a teridactyle about to eat the rabbit, a mountain lion about to grab the terrydactyle, a velociraptor about to eat the mountain lion, and a Trex about to snag the velociraptor.... just waiting for their first meal, because as the bible says...there was no death until they ate from the tree. Not laughable at all.
From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.AAFitz wrote:From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
Also...I say million, because since the young earth creationists believe there were only 6000-10000 years...talking about the actual 4.5 billion or so is irrelevant. 100000, 1000000, 10000000...it all means the same to them...
Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote:I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.AAFitz wrote:From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
Also...I say million, because since the young earth creationists believe there were only 6000-10000 years...talking about the actual 4.5 billion or so is irrelevant. 100000, 1000000, 10000000...it all means the same to them...
Yeah, it's totally fake, I know a guy who's trying to breed a werewolf with his dog, they still have neither children nor puppies.Frigidus wrote:Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote:I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.AAFitz wrote:From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
Also...I say million, because since the young earth creationists believe there were only 6000-10000 years...talking about the actual 4.5 billion or so is irrelevant. 100000, 1000000, 10000000...it all means the same to them...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Oh yeah... and im sure you have the quote for that one. Of course...a creationist would never just write something down or believe it without proof.Frigidus wrote:Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote:I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.AAFitz wrote:From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
Also...I say million, because since the young earth creationists believe there were only 6000-10000 years...talking about the actual 4.5 billion or so is irrelevant. 100000, 1000000, 10000000...it all means the same to them...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
But the guy plays a mean game of B-Ball. Especially if someone fouls him.MeDeFe wrote:Yeah, it's totally fake, I know a guy who's trying to breed a werewolf with his dog, they still have neither children nor puppies.
Who created the story of God and the bible...THE ARMY wrote:hey atheist? who created science and matter that science is built on?
HAHA SUCK ON THAT ONE!!!!!!!
You guys might want to sit this out. The grown ups are talking.MeDeFe wrote:Yeah, it's totally fake, I know a guy who's trying to breed a werewolf with his dog, they still have neither children nor puppies.Frigidus wrote:Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote: I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Look, it's in the Bible.AAFitz wrote:Oh yeah... and im sure you have the quote for that one. Of course...a creationist would never just write something down or believe it without proof.Frigidus wrote:Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote:I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.AAFitz wrote:From what I understand it was very cool. But nothing compared to watching the plants on the earth survive in zero degree weather... and by zero, i mean absolute zero of course. There was no sun.2dimes wrote:A million years? You're one old dude AA. Sorry you missed the red sea thing. Wrong place at the wrong time I suppose.
Also...I say million, because since the young earth creationists believe there were only 6000-10000 years...talking about the actual 4.5 billion or so is irrelevant. 100000, 1000000, 10000000...it all means the same to them...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tell you what, I bet God Himself will not find a scientist stating that a plant evolved from a hampster...but excellent point...
and to be fair...its as believable as the universe being created in 24 hours....oh, but wait...you have proof of that...
Dogs are grown up at age 2 or 3. And he's been at it with the bitch for 4 already.2dimes wrote:You guys might want to sit this out. The grown ups are talking.MeDeFe wrote:Yeah, it's totally fake, I know a guy who's trying to breed a werewolf with his dog, they still have neither children nor puppies.Frigidus wrote:Evolutionists would have you believe that plants evolved from hampsters.2dimes wrote: I liked the part where you compare the death of a plant to the death of a hampster.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
AAFitz wrote:its as believable as the universe being created in 24 hours....oh, but wait...you have proof of that...
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Which box, Jay?jay_a2j wrote:AAFitz wrote:its as believable as the universe being created in 24 hours....oh, but wait...you have proof of that...
Start by taking God out of the box you have Him in.
jay_a2j wrote:Start by taking God out of the box you have Him in.AAFitz wrote:its as believable as the universe being created in 24 hours....oh, but wait...you have proof of that...

saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Read Bart D. Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus...The story behind who changed the bible and why". This book does a pretty good job of showing how fake the bible is.PLAYER57832 wrote:This is the absolute truth, however as a speaker of more than one language yourself (I believe you have said previously -- correct me if wrong), you know that there is often a big differance between translating meanings and translating words. The Bible meanings have been translated with astounding accuracy. However, people who wish to look at each individual word instead of the overall text can and do have issues with people who look at the overall meanings... whether they do it with good (even Christian) intent or to try and "disprove" the Bible.luns101 wrote:No matter how many times this has been explained that this was indeed, what did not happen, it keeps getting repeated.the Bible as it stands today has be translated and re-translated so many times through the ages(as it was passed down from one generation to another) that the subsequent paraphrasing has taken it's toll on the meaning of the words in the bible.
Further, many people within Christendom assert many things that are not actually even in the Bible (as I know you are well aware).
I think that this is a pretty profound statement, especially when applied to Issac Newton who in my opinion is the most brilliant human that has ever lived.cowboyz wrote:If Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton couldn't explain life without the existence of God, then atheists are gonna have a tough job.
Good luck

Oh shit! God scared me there. I thought that box just played "Pop Goes the Weasel"!MeDeFe wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Start by taking God out of the box you have Him in.AAFitz wrote:its as believable as the universe being created in 24 hours....oh, but wait...you have proof of that...