Moderator: Tournament Directors

banana_hammocks wrote:Nate/ Sully
The clues pointed at the wrong date for me, living in Britain the user joined at 2 am on the 2nd june. (probably should have still got it tho).
banana_hammocks wrote:Nate/ Sully
The clues pointed at the wrong date for me, living in Britain the user joined at 2 am on the 2nd june. (probably should have still got it tho).
dittoeevee8888 wrote:Also, I thought you said that only 3 people were getting in. What happened?
I see. But still, my suggestion still applies.Natewolfman wrote:no, i said 3 more people were getting in lol, most people had already advanceddittoeevee8888 wrote:Also, I thought you said that only 3 people were getting in. What happened?
the problem with this is, what happens when everyone gets it? over and over? I only have a limited number of people who game me the clues, i cannot keep going forever, ya know? I would have loved too, but this tournament has been a tough one to keep on a regular schedualdittoeevee8888 wrote: EDIT: I think for next time, you should have done something along the lines of "Everybody who gets it by xx/xx/xx will get in" versus "first 6 or 03/11/09, whichever comes first."

I'm gonna go with, "The next time Nate does a massive tourney update and bumps all 17,000 of his active tourney threads."danielcmr wrote:When will the clues start coming?
A mixture of that and when the last game endsgeigerm wrote:I'm gonna go with, "The next time Nate does a massive tourney update and bumps all 17,000 of his active tourney threads."danielcmr wrote:When will the clues start coming?
