Machiavelli wrote: If he was mafia pretending to be a cop then the real cop would have roleclaimed
absolutely - which casts doubts on who the doctor needs to protect.
No it doesnt, because once the other cop role claims we lynch one of the two supposed cops. If we lynch the real cop then we know who one of the mafia members is. If we lynch the lying cop (mafia) then that is even better.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:My point is it was not as clear as the wicked one is trying to make it. Otherwise the scenario for EVERY game would be the cop claiming it on day 1 - the doc protecting him at night - and a definitive investigation every night. see? not that exciting suddenly is it?
No, because then what happens when the mafia kills, or the town lynches, the doctor? Then the cop is the next to go and the mafia will win soon after.
MB, what are the chances Houssam's only win condition is to kill me? That's insane. Yes, we enjoy the back and forth, since we both like to argue... lol. sorry if it's distracting, but I haven't seen any real evidence against trestain yet, but I am watching it.
Houssam, why haven't you told me what your PM role says yet? I've asked about 3-4 times now.
wicked wrote:MB, what are the chances Houssam's only win condition is to kill me?
None.(which is why I didn't vote you and which is also why I'm so puzzled).
Now, if Andy has used the Village Idiot role before, then that would explain Houssam's actions( people think he's mafia, he gets lynched thus fullfilling his win condition)..
first up just remember xenhu and MB came after me, master bush you were first the reasons nothing but speculation and voted straight away, i think i am allowed to be a bit suspicious of this. you have to admit you have been fast to vcast your votes.
xzenhu when i posted that question about your wording i did not suspect you i only did it to see what you would say, it was not meant any other way at that time. It was only when you started lying your suspicions with me so strongly that i suspected you were only there to back MB up and i may have caught you slipping up.
now that theory of MB has stuck in my mind it seems very plausible and i would like to hear why bogus is so convinced of Master bush and wicked
i think we should look at MB,s theory about wicked and Houssam.
i for one am not ready to vote yet
Battles are won by slaughter and manoeuvre. The greater the general, the more he contributes in manoeuvre, the less he demands in slaughter.
Winston Churchill
trestain wrote:xzenhu when i posted that question about your wording i did not suspect you i only did it to see what you would say, it was not meant any other way at that time. It was only when you started lying your suspicions with me so strongly that i suspected you were only there to back MB up and i may have caught you slipping up.
This is such a waste. Their roles state that they are ex husband and wife who hate each other. They both said that. So doesn't it make sense that they would waste time fighting with each other? People, forget about these 2. Neither are mafia. That fact that Bogusbet & Moz are voting with those 2, makes me believe that Bogusbet is mafia, and moz very well might be the 4th mafia.
"You know what they say about Love and War...."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
This is such a waste. Their roles state that they are ex husband and wife who hate each other. They both said that. So doesn't it make sense that they would waste time fighting with each other? People, forget about these 2. Neither are mafia. That fact that Bogusbet & Moz are voting with those 2, makes me believe that Bogusbet is mafia, and moz very well might be the 4th mafia.
Wicked --> playing a role to try and lynch her ex HoussamTheGreat --> playing a role to try and lynch his ex Everyone else
This is what's going on here. I will most likely be killed off, after we waste this day lynching either Wicked or HoussamTheGreat. But mark these words, cause they are spot on.
"You know what they say about Love and War...."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
trestain wrote:xzenhu when i posted that question about your wording i did not suspect you i only did it to see what you would say, it was not meant any other way at that time. It was only when you started lying your suspicions with me so strongly that i suspected you were only there to back MB up and i may have caught you slipping up.
Prey tell,
Where was it that I started 'lying'...
-X
" lying your suspicions with me" It is a phrase that means you are accusing me. I did not accuse you of lying, all i said was the way you worded that post might have been a slip up.
Battles are won by slaughter and manoeuvre. The greater the general, the more he contributes in manoeuvre, the less he demands in slaughter.
Winston Churchill
No Bogey, I'm pretty sure Houssam and I are married/getting divorced in this. There's no way he would've known I had a spouse and an Inn since I stated my info first and hadn't divulged that. (I don't think?)
trestain wrote:xzenhu when i posted that question about your wording i did not suspect you i only did it to see what you would say, it was not meant any other way at that time. It was only when you started lying your suspicions with me so strongly that i suspected you were only there to back MB up and i may have caught you slipping up.
Prey tell,
Where was it that I started 'lying'...
-X
" lying your suspicions with me" It is a phrase that means you are accusing me. I did not accuse you of lying, all i said was the way you worded that post might have been a slip up.
So, your only defense is that I'm voting the same person that MB is voting(which happens to be you)...
I have my own reasons for voting you and I think the fact that you have a weak argument just further cements my point..
On another note, I'll prolly be off in about 5-10 minutes(to eat dinner) and I doubt I'll be on during the rest of the night(I need a break)...So, I will be back sometime tomorrow..
how about this guys, the Tres thing just isn't flying for me right now because there's not enough info, but how he aligns himself today in the wicked v. houssam thing may shed more light on the matter. so hop on the houssam is guilty train and let's see!
wicked wrote:how about this guys, the Tres thing just isn't flying for me right now because there's not enough info, but how he aligns himself today in the wicked v. houssam thing may shed more light on the matter. so hop on the houssam is guilty train and let's see!
I'm still standing by my vote...(it could be my last)...
xenhu ll i ave done is suspect you, why are you so keen to vote me out because you have given no info whatsever, at least i have tried to tell you why i was suspicious of you.
what exactly are your reaons xen
Battles are won by slaughter and manoeuvre. The greater the general, the more he contributes in manoeuvre, the less he demands in slaughter.
Winston Churchill