TheBro wrote:..
He is e_i_pi. Can't you read?
i think Scotty meant: "what is your stake in this conversation and why the inflammatory tone?", Bro (heh he can say a lot in a couple of words
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Moderator: Clan Directors
TheBro wrote:..
He is e_i_pi. Can't you read?
jiminski wrote:TheBro wrote:..
He is e_i_pi. Can't you read?
i think Scotty meant: "what is your stake in this conversation and why the inflammatory tone?", Bro (heh he can say a lot in a couple of words) ... Eip has no avatar up, so it's not immediately obvious that he's a LOWarrior.
Scott-Land wrote:jiminski wrote:TheBro wrote:..
He is e_i_pi. Can't you read?
i think Scotty meant: "what is your stake in this conversation and why the inflammatory tone?", Bro (heh he can say a lot in a couple of words) ... Eip has no avatar up, so it's not immediately obvious that he's a LOWarrior.
Yeah what he said-- too bad Liz doesn't get me like you do Jimi.
Why do you have to be so literal Bro? And yes I can I read. I can play non-hasbro risk too-- pm me if you have more personal questions.
jpcloet wrote:After the league is done, the CLA will look at #1. I think part of what is happening is that games are being made on Saturday for many clans, and then being delivered on Sundays or later. That means leaders then spend 2 or 3 weekdays waiting for players to sign up and then assign out. Very few have timed out, but some have. I'm definitely going to ask for feedback on the clan league contacts on that one. Some other changes in the league setup might help that as well. Eg if we went from 10 home to 5and5 as suggested for cross-overs. Although cross-overs might be gone, but 5and5 would still work.
Trips and Quads are definitely on the table and is probably the most likely situation even though no vote has been taken on season 2 ideas as we are still gathering all ideas. A separate league for trip and quads was also suggested.
Incandenza wrote:I think pi may be on to something. It might be interesting to have the current tourney format become the "regular season", then the 3 division winners and 1 wild card proceed to the playoffs... as far as the fact that there's clearly a Group of Death, well, I'm not sure how that could have been averted given the randomized creation of divisions, but perhaps in the future teams could be seeded according to their ladder rank (tho even that's no magic bullet, as the monkis are currently 10th in the ladder, a rank that certainly doesn't reflect their play).
e_i_pi wrote:I don't know what the solution is, and really it's not a -huge- problem, but it is a case where more balance could be introduced to keep the playfield level
Incandenza wrote:At this point in the season it's 3.
jpcloet wrote:Playoffs seem to be gaining momentum with people. Expand on that one, if we are playing 10 games a week, would you go to say 15 (7+7+1 neutral map) or go (5+5 and if tie?)
jpcloet wrote:The idea of "sets of maps"or standard maps has not been well received
Incandenza wrote:At this point in the season it's 3.
ahunda wrote:Maybe a stupid question: What does GB in the table stand for ?
waseemalim wrote:LOW vs. LOD -- should be 6-3 so far. Not 5-4. Please correct.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users