Moderator: Community Team
obliterationX wrote:Makes it more strategic. Know how freestyle works before you join any games, that's what I say.
obliterationX wrote:Makes it more strategic. Know how freestyle works before you join any games, that's what I say.
Artimis wrote:obliterationX wrote:Makes it more strategic. Know how freestyle works before you join any games, that's what I say.
If double turns are so cool and such good strategy, then answer me this: Why was a turn delay implemented for the player that ends the round in a freestyle game in the first place?
obliterationX wrote:Makes it more strategic. Know how freestyle works before you join any games, that's what I say.
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Joodoo wrote:so even if a player runs out of time, he/she has to wait for another player to begin turn before he/she can begin turn the next round?
ManBungalow wrote:If you don't like freestyle, you don't have to play it. As much as I would like something like this to happen, I don't think it will.
banana_hammocks wrote:I don't think this argument is valid. It is not a question of preferences. It is a question of making something better.
This is like saying "if some people are using drugs in sport, let them...just don't play football."
demonfork wrote:It's only technically a double turn if team 2 is not present to take their turn(s) as well when the clock flips.
Should it really be team 1's fault if team 2 decides to not show up to take their turn too?
It's not difficult to figure out when an opponent is going to attempt to take a "double turn", if you suspect that they are, show up and take your turn too, that's what I do. If you can't make it then you lack the dedication that it takes to be a good freestyle player and you should probably just stick to sequential.
Bruceswar wrote:Incorrect. I have seen it done many times in speed fs doubles, etc. 1 second is rare, but 2 is really easy. If you are playing vs someone without CM they can kiss that bonus good bye.
sully800 wrote:I believe the turn timing out logically should have been included as a form of ending your turn.
karelpietertje wrote:sully800 wrote:I believe the turn timing out logically should have been included as a form of ending your turn.
just a question: could anybody tell me what will happen when 2 people run out of time at the same time?
because if it will be like sully800 here states, wouldn't the Red player be in advantage (just like the Red player has a disadvantage when it comes to deadbeating in the same round as others)?
has anybody thought this through?
kp
cramill wrote:I think I suggested before: that if multiple people miss ending their turn they are all locked out. (For example a 4 player game - 2 players miss ending their turn and the round timer expires - both players who timed out would have to wait until someone else takes their turn to go, or until half the round goes by.) If everyone who is in the game miss ending their turn, they would all be locked out, but it shouldn't be hard to add something to check if everyone is locked out and if so, let everyone be able to go at the start of the next round.
Make sense?
Timminz wrote:I had never really thought of it before (since I don't play freestyle), but the addition of objectives has really emphasized one of the problems with freestyle. Even if this particular suggestion were implemented, the exploit would still be there. As long as someone can click "begin turn", as soon as another player starts, they'll still be using the same trick. It would just be slightly more time consuming.
