Moderator: Community Team
SEAsportsfan wrote:Thoughts, reactions, complaints?
I thought that the Seahawks had their best draft in a long time, not only picking up the best defensive player, but picking up a Center, and a 1st rounder next year. I also like San Fran's draft, Crabtree will be great. But the worst draft easily went to Oakland in my opinion...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
karel wrote:lmao not sure what oakland was thinking..maybe that's why they have sucked since the 70's.
I'm happy with the packers pick...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Question: who would you have picked: Sanchez or Stafford?
SEAsportsfan wrote:strike wolf wrote:Question: who would you have picked: Sanchez or Stafford?
easy, Stafford. i still don't trust sanchez, being in a "college-only" system and having only played 16 games. what separates him from Graham Harrell?
how about SF and SEA entering the 2010 QB market by getting 2010 1st rounders today? honestly, i think this is a great idea, because i wasnt impressed by the QBs, aside from Freeman, who was drafted too high, imo.
speaking of SF and SEA, who drafted ESPN's highest rated offensive and defensive players, which one will have the better career; Crabby or Curry? I'm going with Crabby
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:SEAsportsfan wrote:strike wolf wrote:Question: who would you have picked: Sanchez or Stafford?
easy, Stafford. i still don't trust sanchez, being in a "college-only" system and having only played 16 games. what separates him from Graham Harrell?
how about SF and SEA entering the 2010 QB market by getting 2010 1st rounders today? honestly, i think this is a great idea, because i wasnt impressed by the QBs, aside from Freeman, who was drafted too high, imo.
speaking of SF and SEA, who drafted ESPN's highest rated offensive and defensive players, which one will have the better career; Crabby or Curry? I'm going with Crabby
Both will have a huge impact. I say Crabby. Easily going to be a dominant force on whatever team he's on.
I'm not impressed with Sanchez and really his interview after being accepted by the Jets was weird.
I mean Stafford may sound a bit stupid the way he talks but he does know what he's talking about. Sanchez well...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
TheProwler wrote:I love talking about myself.
Haywood Jablomie wrote:your dice are slaying me!!!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
skaterchild3 wrote:Jet's made a great trade for a QB that can replace Favre.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:skaterchild3 wrote:Jet's made a great trade for a QB that can replace Favre.
Yeah man, I really hope Sanchez comes through. But you just know the Daily News is thrilled, because the first time he screws up, they'll run a huge "Dirty Sanchez" headline...And I'll still buy it just because.
Looks like they've made some good calls on defense, and even though they haven't picked up a WR yet, I'm happy enough with the way things are shaking out to have faith. They can always make some trades later if necessary. This is going to be a building year anyway.
LET'S GO JETS!
TheProwler wrote:I love talking about myself.
Haywood Jablomie wrote:your dice are slaying me!!!
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
TheBro wrote:I'm going to try to defend Oakland, only because I'm a Maryland fan so I like Heyward-Bey. To clarify, I'm not happy he's stuck in Oakland, but I suppose he'll get more money for the first few years. , I'm going to assume that we are not experts. I'm positive the scouts checked out all four of the big receivers, including Crabby.
First, we can try to address the problems with Crabtree, but there aren't any... Some question his character, but that obviously had nothing to do with not drafting him; it is Oakland. Crabtree is an all around solid receiver, and will be successful with the 49ers in a few years.
Now, look at Heyward-Bey. The knock on him were his 'lack of production' in his college years. Kiper and a few other analysts said he was shut down in a few games last season, not even catching one pass. Furthermore, Heyward-Bey doesn't run routes as well as the other receivers. Now, why did they draft him? He's big, 6-2, 6-3 I believe, he can out jump most guys, and he's fast as shit. NFL coaches can teach a guy to catch, they can teach a guy to run routes, but they can't teach him to run fast and jump over defenders.
That is why Oakland took Heyward-Bey. They believe they can coach him to be more successful than Crabby. If I were Al Davis, and I'm glad I'm not, I would have taken Crabtree or traded down to get Heyward-Bey. Heyward-Bey may be a bust in Oakland, but he will find success after he's done there.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.