Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance [Cleared]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Locked
User avatar
Dobs
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:11 am

Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance [Cleared]

Post by Dobs »

<Fralom>
<riodeishire>


The accused are suspected of:


Conducting Diplomacy

Ganging up - but verbally admitting so

2009-05-27 06:04:31 - riodeishere: GL and HF
2009-05-27 06:06:40 - Dobs: U2
2009-05-27 06:23:06 - fralom: hf?
2009-05-27 06:23:19 - fralom: wow green
2009-05-27 06:23:24 - riodeishere: have fun :)
2009-05-27 06:24:30 - Dobs: havin fun!
2009-05-27 06:25:58 - fralom: everybory against the green?
2009-05-27 06:26:52 - riodeishere: agreed
2009-05-27 06:29:27 - Dobs: suiciding - how professional

Game number(s): 4966451


Comments:
Was having a good fun game - I was playing OK then they decided to group together. They backed off after I threatened to report them.
Masli
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance

Post by Masli »

I sucks, but nothing wrong. They stated it in the chat, happens a lot that the others target the stronger one
Image
Masli
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance

Post by Masli »

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy

Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic.
Image
User avatar
riodeishere
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance

Post by riodeishere »

Dobs wrote:<Fralom>
<riodeishire>


The accused are suspected of:


Conducting Diplomacy

Ganging up - but verbally admitting so



Game number(s): 4966451


Comments:
Was having a good fun game - I was playing OK then they decided to group together. They backed off after I threatened to report them.


oh come on, "Conducting Diplomacy" that not against the rules, all diplomacy was in game chat and unless i'm mistaken that's the main function of game chat (and to make bad jokes).

and "They backed off after I threatened to report them." no .hahaha, diplomacy changes as power changes hands.

and for your attitude, i'm sadened by the fact as soon as it begins to look bad, you throw the game. game log won't show this because he targets red large numbers and my 1's which were in the way of my larger armys.
therefore giving me an advantage.
PS: look at game chat and case will be cleared. i don't think i've even played with them before.
lancehoch
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance

Post by lancehoch »

From looking at the game log, it seems that you were indeed the strongest person in the game at the time they made the comments and alliance. Diplomacy is allowed in games, it is secret diplomacy that is not allowed.

riodeishere and fralom are Cleared of secret diplomacy.
User avatar
Dobs
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:11 am

Re: Fralom & Riodeishire - Alliance [Cleared]

Post by Dobs »

Fair enough - Im new still learning!
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”