GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
So, you're ok with all this immigration. Open the doors and let the world flood into our country!
This will invite anarchy, drop in wages and benefits, a loss of American culture with millions of foreigners who won't assimilate. Heck, ask those billions of Chinese, Africans and Indians, that our doors are open to them and you better get use to a immediate drop in our Quality of Life.
I answered part of this in my last post.
You are looking at this backwards. If there are no jobs, people won't come. If there are jobs, then we NEED people to come. Throughout the 80's and 90's there was an employment SURPLUS. Many areas could simply not fill jobs. (fact-- check it out) that does not mean that everyone everywhere worked, but it means that overall..there were more openings than people willing to fill those jobs. THAT is a large part of why we saw a surge in immigration.
ADDING to that the fact that employers could basically hire these people with impunity, with no extra cost involved. In fact, they could often cut corners, not offer ANY benefits, not pay the going wage, etc. Those that did this essentially forced other to do much the same or be out-competed. THAT -- employers -- is where enforcement should center and then the "problem" will take care of itself.
The REAL threat to wages? Employers who feel its more important to line thier pockets than their employees. An ethic that not only looks at profit by excluding externalities, but considers employees "externalities", not an inherent part of doing business. As long as employers are allowed to pay people -- legal OR illegal less than it costs them to live IN THIS COUNTRY.. our welfare system will be propping up employers AND encouraging them to hire illegal aliens. Again, even though not all employers feel this way, they often have little choice but to pay low wages, etc, if they want to stay in business. BUT, it STARTS with the greedy guy, then filters down until everyone has to cut every cost to the absolute nubbin.
That is why your so-called "solutions" -- shipping everyone out -- won't work. YOU don't tackle the real root of the problem.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
I guess that wouldn't bother you and the rest of your bleeding heart friends, but it does matter to most Americans. Our standard of living has decrease rapidly after 8 years of Bush/Cheney and the rest of their free traders and pro-business special interests. Our unemployment rate will reach 10 percent this year and maybe higher next year and you want to open our doors to uncontrolled immigration?
Yes, and guess who argued for putting up the fence, heavil TIGHTENING immigration, etc. -- Bush. Yes, he talked out of both sides of his mouth, but you can hardly blame LIBERALS for the past 8 years!
Now you are plain getting ludicrous!
And no, I don't "want to open the doors to uncontrolled unemployment", I want to solve the REAL PROBLEM! The real problem is NOT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. The make the symptoms worse, make an easy target, but every problem you cite as caused by illegal aliens is, in fact, a problem for a HUGE percentage of WORKING AMERICAN CITIZENS. It may be that the largest group of working poor in YOUR town are illegal. (though DO remember, not every Mexican is illegal!). BUT, the PROBLEM is that people can work and work and work and STILL not make ends meet .. STILL need to rely on government help to feed their families, get a decent house AND get medical care. WE are supporting negligent employers. THAT is the problem, not illegal aliens who also take some of those deficient jobs. The problem is the jobs that don't pay decent wages.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Yes, the New World Indians had a very liberal immigration policy and it wasn't too long before those Europeans flooded the Americas into submission. Now YOU want to repeat history?
No, they really did not. If you believe that, you have not studied history.
Some tribes did accept Europeans, BUT many, many more did not ... and were exterminated or nearly exterminated. Some faught with such ferocity that they earned the respect of those who battled them, though they still were defeated. Many others did not fight, not because of a "liberal immigration policy" as you call it, but because families and small tribes simply did not have the means to fight hundreds and thousands of gun-toting Europeans. So, they tried to deal, to bargain. And believed that whites would be honerable and follow through.
Fighting might be the "macho" thing, but it can also be a good way to get yourself killed.
No, you need to study history a bit more. Nothing is ever as simple as you paint here.