Moderator: Community Team
wait so is this your opinion or US law?thegreekdog wrote:It's not murder. Murder is a version of homicide which can only be committed against a person (not an animal).
There are crimes against police dogs that are crimes against police humans (never thought I'd use the phrase "police humans").
More US common law than my opinion, although I did go to law school and pass the bar exam.bedub1 wrote:wait so is this your opinion or US law?thegreekdog wrote:It's not murder. Murder is a version of homicide which can only be committed against a person (not an animal).
There are crimes against police dogs that are crimes against police humans (never thought I'd use the phrase "police humans").
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Will Rogers wrote:"If there are no dogs in heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Not for you, check posts 2 and 4mpjh wrote:Killing your date is always murder.
Like TheGreekdog said not murder but just as killing a cop usually leads to more punishment than killing a regular civilian, it would make sense that killing a police dog would come with more punishment than killing some random family's pet dog. As for running from the police dog=resisting arrest that's kind of obvious sense it's probably coming after you because it's a trained dog used to chase down and subdue criminal suspects....of course if this is a police dog that was less than adequately trained and decided to chase after you because it wants to eat your cheeseburger than that's a completely different scenario...bedub1 wrote:I think I heard if you kill a police dog, you will be charged with Murder, like the dog is a person. Is this correct? If it is, do you agree with it? And apparently running from a police dog that is trained to bite you and assault you is resisting arrest...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Just because your date is a dog, you can't murder her.pmchugh wrote:Not for you, check posts 2 and 4mpjh wrote:Killing your date is always murder.
You're assuming that police follow normal lines of logic and/or law. They (and the judges who kowtow to them) can make up any fooking thing they want to.thegreekdog wrote:It's not murder. Murder is a version of homicide which can only be committed against a person (not an animal).
There are crimes against police dogs that are crimes against police humans (never thought I'd use the phrase "police humans").
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Yeah, I think that's right. They are considered "officers" which I find ridiculous.apey wrote:I am pretty sure that it is not murder for killing it, BUT if you hit it it is assaulting an officer
Really? Even if you're not trying to hit the person?mpjh wrote:Actually it makes sense. Here if you hit a car with your fist, it can be considered an assault against a person sitting in the car.
the threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.
So I guess if they hit the car, they are making a threat of imminent violence against the driver. I didn't thnk that would be codified.mpjh wrote:Correct.
Assault is thethe threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.