[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
apb23 wrote:It's funny...because b4 when you were mentioning my rating, you said that you did not enjoy the first dubs game that we played, and you rated me after our freestyle game. Then, you recall that dubs game from months and months back to rate me????? If you remembered that, than why not remember to upgrade??? Hypocrite?
No. simply human. Somedays i remember alot of things. Somedays i forget to take money with me when i go shopping. Somedays i have no spare time what so ever. Somedays i have alot so i can take the time to rate people i play here. Or uprate people.. I jsut did it yesterday agaisnt another swede....
So you had enough time to remember something from months back??? As you said, you have played so many games and its hard to remember the exact reason for the rating, so then how did you remember a game from months back?
apb23 wrote:Sorry, that last post was a bit harsh...just tryin to get my point across.
No, problem. I admit it seem vendictive but it is nothing personal. I actually think i have a good spread on my ratings. Perhaps a bit low but they are almost 3.00. I think it is more fare to rate people 3's all the time then 5's all the time.
As i said before. People rating low is a problem (not a big one on this site.. but still)
But i also think people rating high is a problem. People rate high in order to not be rated low themself and it is abuse in my book.
apb23 wrote:So you had enough time to remember something from months back??? As you said, you have played so many games and its hard to remember the exact reason for the rating, so then how did you remember a game from months back?
some games are easier to remember then others. Even those with no chat. I think i remeber that your friend fought well in our first game. I think we almost lost altough it was 2 vs 1 and that is one reason i remember that game. Perhaps there were more reason. Not sure
That game didn't last long or possess anything meaningful. I also highly doubt that it came that close, but there's no way to resimulate it precisely or anything.
apb23 wrote:That game didn't last long or possess anything meaningful. I also highly doubt that it came that close, but there's no way to resimulate it precisely or anything.
well. It did to me. I remember he almost, or perhaps he did get, a bonus. And my partner was working alot so we couldnt co-ordinate as much.
It was well played by him.
I remembered the game. I only answered your question why i did.
You could figure out the bonus part by just have looking at the game log (I haven't so I am not even sure if you are accurate, but will go with it). You could also make up the partner part by looking at the fact that you were take most of the turns. Nothing new here.
apb23 wrote:You could figure out the bonus part by just have looking at the game log (I haven't so I am not even sure if you are accurate, but will go with it). You could also make up the partner part by looking at the fact that you were take most of the turns. Nothing new here.
I dont understand you. This part: "looking at the fact that you were take most of the turns"
I tried to explain that i remembered our game. I have forgotten alot of games. And i remember some. Sometimes when i play with someone. Bad or good i look him or her up to see if i have played the person before. Simple as that.
That's interesting tho...b/c every excuse or reason that you have given me you have no proof to back up. And then when I bring it up again you change the subject.
apb23 wrote:That's interesting tho...b/c every excuse or reason that you have given me you have no proof to back up. And then when I bring it up again you change the subject.
Nono.. Lets stay on the subject.. this is fun...
Havent i only answered your questions you have asked me in here now? I sure have tried..
apb23 wrote:That's interesting tho...b/c every excuse or reason that you have given me you have no proof to back up. And then when I bring it up again you change the subject.
Nono.. Lets stay on the subject.. this is fun...
Havent i only answered your questions you have asked me in here now? I sure have tried..
You haven't answered many of my questions, and especially the more important 1s, such as the reasoning for some of your ratings. You simply say there is more than the gamechat, and then don't show a PM or anything.
apb23 wrote:That's interesting tho...b/c every excuse or reason that you have given me you have no proof to back up. And then when I bring it up again you change the subject.
Nono.. Lets stay on the subject.. this is fun...
Havent i only answered your questions you have asked me in here now? I sure have tried..
You haven't answered many of my questions, and especially the more important 1s, such as the reasoning for some of your ratings. You simply say there is more than the gamechat, and then don't show a PM or anything.
THen you have an answer but not the proof. Right?
I have only said there are pleny of other factors when I rate. (and other people too i guess)
I will not give out PM's to the public eye since that would be offensive in my view. I told you so earlier.
But then it comes down to the plain thing. I have stated a fact that there are other reasons then the gamechat. That is your answer to your question and my reason.
As I have said many times before, I am referring to your recent games. Look at your recent ratings. To be honest, I would like to know your reasoning for all of them, as they are all low and appear to be for no reason. You are once again using the PM excuse which obviously does not work as you refuse to back it up.
This is cleared. Juventino, when the warning was sent to you, I gave you examples of people who you gave some ratings that are questionable by means that the game in reference does not support it. You can not claim that you and the other guy had a private chat outside the game or even probably talked about it on the phone or whatever and then say he didn't live up to your alleged agreement, hence the poor rating.
By this, it's going to be your word against his. You can rate players but be sure that the game in reference show some logic into it and not from somewhere you claim you and the other guy had a chat with.
Don't give a 1 star rating when the game in reference does not support it. The game is the source of the ratings, not the live chats, pm's or from somewhere else.
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
